nCoV public service announcement. (IMPORTANT)

Quote from: Stash on March 10, 2023, 01:48:26 PM

Eight U.S. government agencies are investigating the source of COVID-19, and they remain very divided on the issue. None of them is certain about the cause. Four lean toward natural causes. Two haven't taken a position. Meanwhile, the evidence produced by the greater scientific community points overwhelmingly to a natural cause, via exposure to an infected animal.

With 8 agencies looking at the origin, I'm confused as to why we also need a bill to do so.

It could have something to do with whose pockets  those eight agencies are in. You see, science doesn't study out of altruism. Only amateur scientists (who I respect more than professionals) do science for the pure joy of learning. And to give you an idea what I mean by amateur scientists, I don't mean those on track to become professional. Those I call "semi-professional".  No, an amateur scientist is one unaligned with what the scientific community thinks.
Most scientists are professional. The ones who aren't have a day job, and do science on their own time. This means "scientific study" means shit because bias is everywhere.

Yes, you need a bill to declassify information about COVID. Otherwise, you have eight scientific groups all saying similar, but they are paid to do so.

Your amateur argument is contrary to your belief system that science, medical research should only be for profit.

A scientist ought to be allowed to pursue any knowledge so long as it shows due effort. We also need to make funding based not on papers but results.

Basically, scientists need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result, so whether you theorize that the Earth is round or flat, you don't make any money until you build something.

In other ewords, amateur scientists "...need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result..."

Science does not need a pracical resukt



Commercially viable applications need science

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 22, 2023, 05:33:55 AM

Quote from: Stash on March 10, 2023, 01:48:26 PM

Eight U.S. government agencies are investigating the source of COVID-19, and they remain very divided on the issue. None of them is certain about the cause. Four lean toward natural causes. Two haven't taken a position. Meanwhile, the evidence produced by the greater scientific community points overwhelmingly to a natural cause, via exposure to an infected animal.

With 8 agencies looking at the origin, I'm confused as to why we also need a bill to do so.

It could have something to do with whose pockets  those eight agencies are in. You see, science doesn't study out of altruism. Only amateur scientists (who I respect more than professionals) do science for the pure joy of learning. And to give you an idea what I mean by amateur scientists, I don't mean those on track to become professional. Those I call "semi-professional".  No, an amateur scientist is one unaligned with what the scientific community thinks.
Most scientists are professional. The ones who aren't have a day job, and do science on their own time. This means "scientific study" means shit because bias is everywhere.

Yes, you need a bill to declassify information about COVID. Otherwise, you have eight scientific groups all saying similar, but they are paid to do so.

Your amateur argument is contrary to your belief system that science, medical research should only be for profit.

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on January 19, 2023, 06:45:43 AM

A scientist ought to be allowed to pursue any knowledge so long as it shows due effort. We also need to make funding based not on papers but results.

Basically, scientists need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result, so whether you theorize that the Earth is round or flat, you don't make any money until you build something.

In other ewords, amateur scientists "...need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result..."

In other words, we can't just have media tell us about globalist shills like Hawking and how they are such a genius, and not at all a handicapped man who has a computer saying things and not him. Even if it was him, the theories are unproven.

You know the theories I have. You don't give them a free pass. You ask me to prove it, then because I'm not a professional scientist, I don't actually understand the proof (if any) that you would accept.

Yet cranks like Hawking are able to just spew theory after theory until they die Mandela Effect (Hawking isn't dead, you later say). Because they are "brilliant."



A little kid is smarter than this man, and disproved him in two minutes.

Quote from: Stash on March 22, 2023, 12:50:55 PM

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 22, 2023, 05:33:55 AM

Quote from: Stash on March 10, 2023, 01:48:26 PM

Eight U.S. government agencies are investigating the source of COVID-19, and they remain very divided on the issue. None of them is certain about the cause. Four lean toward natural causes. Two haven't taken a position. Meanwhile, the evidence produced by the greater scientific community points overwhelmingly to a natural cause, via exposure to an infected animal.

With 8 agencies looking at the origin, I'm confused as to why we also need a bill to do so.

It could have something to do with whose pockets  those eight agencies are in. You see, science doesn't study out of altruism. Only amateur scientists (who I respect more than professionals) do science for the pure joy of learning. And to give you an idea what I mean by amateur scientists, I don't mean those on track to become professional. Those I call "semi-professional".  No, an amateur scientist is one unaligned with what the scientific community thinks.
Most scientists are professional. The ones who aren't have a day job, and do science on their own time. This means "scientific study" means shit because bias is everywhere.

Yes, you need a bill to declassify information about COVID. Otherwise, you have eight scientific groups all saying similar, but they are paid to do so.

Your amateur argument is contrary to your belief system that science, medical research should only be for profit.

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on January 19, 2023, 06:45:43 AM

A scientist ought to be allowed to pursue any knowledge so long as it shows due effort. We also need to make funding based not on papers but results.

Basically, scientists need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result, so whether you theorize that the Earth is round or flat, you don't make any money until you build something.

In other ewords, amateur scientists "...need to make their money from inventions. Science should always have a practical result..."

In other words, we can't just have media tell us about globalist shills like Hawking and how they are such a genius, and not at all a handicapped man who has a computer saying things and not him. Even if it was him, the theories are unproven.

You know the theories I have. You don't give them a free pass. You ask me to prove it, then because I'm not a professional scientist, I don't actually understand the proof (if any) that you would accept.

Yet cranks like Hawking are able to just spew theory after theory until they die Mandela Effect (Hawking isn't dead, you later say). Because they are "brilliant."



A little kid is smarter than this man, and disproved him in two minutes.

lol

You should probably not talk about things you don’t understand. Theories aren’t proven.

That's funny, because for the most part, I do understand the kid.

But yes, let's throw your advice back at you.

That's funny, because for the most part, I do understand the kid.

But yes, let's throw your advice back at you.

The kid is certainly a genius. I mean talking at 7 months old? That's insane. In any case, he doesn't prove Hawking wrong as, for one, there's no way to prove him right. For two, all the kid is doing is proposing a theory that something existed prior to the big bang 13.8 billion years ago and inserts 'God' as that something. Hawking was an atheist for sure. That was his belief system, just like your belief system is yours.

His belief was:
“God is the name people give to the reason we are here,” he said. “But I think that reason is the laws of physics rather than someone with whom one can have a personal relationship. An impersonal God.”
“Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist,” he wrote in The Grand Design. “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going.”

What the kid is countering with is simply that something can't come from nothing, therefore God. The "therefore" could be anything. He picks a god. Hawking, like many others, believe that a god is not a requirement.

As for scientific theories, they are never "proven". They are usually our best guesses based upon observations, experimentation, measurements repeated over and over again. Einstein had this to say:

The scientific theorist is not to be envied. For Nature, or more precisely experiment, is an inexorable and not very friendly judge of his work. It never says "Yes" to a theory. In the most favorable cases it says "Maybe," and in the great majority of cases simply "No." If an experiment agrees with a theory it means for the latter "Maybe," and if it does not agree it means "No." Probably every theory will someday experience its "No"—most theories, soon after conception.

In the mean time, if a theory is operational and effectively satisfies our needs, holds up to repeated observations, experimentation, measurements, then it is a useful assumption until such time that something comes along with greater veracity, accuracy under those conditions and parameters.

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 28, 2023, 05:39:37 AM

That's funny, because for the most part, I do understand the kid.

But yes, let's throw your advice back at you.

The kid is certainly a genius. I mean talking at 7 months old? That's insane. In any case, he doesn't prove Hawking wrong as, for one, there's no way to prove him right. For two, all the kid is doing is proposing a theory that something existed prior to the big bang 13.8 billion years ago and inserts 'God' as that something. Hawking was an atheist for sure. That was his belief system, just like your belief system is yours.

His belief was:

Actually, we have this thing called logic. When a person's theory doesn't hold with reality or contradicts itself, we can't exactly prove the opposite, but we can prove that something is a flawed premise.

Going back to COVID, when people are told they must wear a mask to go to a restaurant, and immediately during eating they pull the mask down, you have an idea of contagion that has fallen apart in a puff of logic. A real disease doesn't leave you alone for the number of minutes while eating. Either it wasn't going to infect you with a mask or without, or being a real bacteria it would be smaller than the breath holes in the mask (only hindering your ability to breathe; hypoxia actually weakens the immune system).

Masks were always about slowing the spread and mitigating risk

So when you go out to a restaurant and you take off your mask when you are at your table and you are conversing with only your own social contacts while everyone else is seated away from you, you have reduced your risk. It didn't reduce it to zero but it is reduced.

But if restaurants kept patrons packed in like sardines and no one had a mask as they walked past every table and talked with the staff who has to deal with everyone there, then the logic is that if an infected person enters the restaurant that more people would walk out also infected. You would notice also that restaurants also had to increase the distance between tables and reduce the amount of people in the space at any one time. They also had to work improving ventilation. The masks worked in tandem with these other measures. It was never simply 'just the mask'

More infections means greater burden on the health system. Masks slow the spread - not make it zero. It was always about slowing the spread. And even a little reduction in the r0 value is enough to affect the number of infections over time, exponentially


No surprise a dimwit like you cant see logic when it presents itself. You should probably stop advertising your ignorance. As in STFU about subjects you dont know anything about

That's funny, because for the most part, I do understand the kid.

But yes, let's throw your advice back at you.

What I was referring to was what I polit in bold font. It’s your lack off understanding when it comes to theories.

Quote from: Stash on March 28, 2023, 07:01:30 AM

Quote from: bulmabriefs144 on March 28, 2023, 05:39:37 AM

That's funny, because for the most part, I do understand the kid.

But yes, let's throw your advice back at you.

The kid is certainly a genius. I mean talking at 7 months old? That's insane. In any case, he doesn't prove Hawking wrong as, for one, there's no way to prove him right. For two, all the kid is doing is proposing a theory that something existed prior to the big bang 13.8 billion years ago and inserts 'God' as that something. Hawking was an atheist for sure. That was his belief system, just like your belief system is yours.

His belief was:

Actually, we have this thing called logic. When a person's theory doesn't hold with reality or contradicts itself, we can't exactly prove the opposite, but we can prove that something is a flawed premise.

Going back to COVID, when people are told they must wear a mask to go to a restaurant, and immediately during eating they pull the mask down, you have an idea of contagion that has fallen apart in a puff of logic. A real disease doesn't leave you alone for the number of minutes while eating. Either it wasn't going to infect you with a mask or without, or being a real bacteria it would be smaller than the breath holes in the mask (only hindering your ability to breathe; hypoxia actually weakens the immune system).

1. You seem to be talking about hypotheses, not theories.
2.Your Covid example would be a problem in the testing of a hypothesis, it is not a problem with the hypothesis or “theory”.
3. Learn how masks work and report back.

Did you learn the difference between “theory” and “hypothesis” yet?

BREAKING NEWS! FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court
By The Exposé on April 2, 2023

The Covid-19 vaccines have been at the centre of a heated debate since their introduction, with many questions and concerns raised about their safety and effectiveness.

Speculation has also been rife that the Covid-19 injections may contain traces of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance.

Medicine regulators, with the support of the Mainstream Media, have repeatedly denied these claims.

But they were lying to you.

Because recent evidence has emerged that confirms the presence of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance, in the Pfizer vaccine. And it has come from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which has been forced to publish the confidential Pfizer documents by order of the Federal Court in the USA.

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/02/fda-confirms-graphene-is-in-the-covid-vaccines/



The FDA had initially attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years, despite approving the injection after only 108 days of a safety review on December 11th, 2020.

However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

One of the most recent documents published by the FDA saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

The study conclusion is as follows-



In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most interesting about the study is that it confirms on page 7 that reduced Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine because it is needed as a base for the lipid nanoparticles.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –



Thus, it is understood and proven from the documents put forward by the FDA and the manufacturer pfizer that the theory that there is graphene oxide in (so-called) vaccines is not just an urban legend and is true.

Thus, it is understood and proven from the documents put forward by the FDA and the manufacturer pfizer that the theory that there is graphene oxide in (so-called) vaccines is not just an urban legend and is true.

Thus, we can conclude that you are just copying and pasting stuff with absolutely no understanding of what the text is even referring to.

That passage is referring to a technique called cryogenic-electron microscopy, which uses graphene oxide to prepare the sample.  It has nothing whatsoever to do with the ingredients for the vaccine.

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-document-idUSL1N367204

No, that was a validation process to check if the vaccine produced spike proteins.

“The described process uses gold mesh grids overlaid with graphene oxide to help visualize the protein under a microscope, Russo said. And that validation process is completely separate from the manufacturing of the vaccine.”

Oh Hi Jimmy.

Wise is the perfect reason why not everyone should be entitled to free speech. I mean wow, the ignorance is next level stupid.

Maybe leave the talking to people who know what the F they are talking about eh 'wise'?

Might be time to call yourself 'moron'. Because wise is something you have never been and never will

But hey, keep advertising what a moron you are. At least you're too stupid to be embarrassed about it

The funny thing is, I don't even know why 'graphene oxide' is the antivaxxers bogeyman. Humans have been consuming it ever since we learned how to cook meat. That produces carbon nano particles too

The level of stupid in antivaxxers lol

Oh Hi Jimmy.

Yo Jura, what's up blud?

You know chillin’, dashing off easily checked facts to burst flimsy bubbles, stuff like that.

How’s it going?

Florida health officials deliberately fudges and hides vaccine data report so that it says something else entirely to appease the anti vaxxers

What a bunch of fuckwits. Should be illegal to manipulate official data to show something else entirely.



Surprise surprise the actual data showed NO increase in all cause and cardiac related mortality.

The funny thing is, I don't even know why 'graphene oxide' is the antivaxxers bogeyman. Humans have been consuming it ever since we learned how to cook meat. That produces carbon nano particles too

The level of stupid in antivaxxers lol

They probably did a search on every item in there with the word "toxic" and that's what they found.

BREAKING NEWS! FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court
By The Exposé on April 2, 2023

The Covid-19 vaccines have been at the centre of a heated debate since their introduction, with many questions and concerns raised about their safety and effectiveness.

Speculation has also been rife that the Covid-19 injections may contain traces of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance.

Medicine regulators, with the support of the Mainstream Media, have repeatedly denied these claims.

But they were lying to you.

Because recent evidence has emerged that confirms the presence of Graphene Oxide, a highly toxic and conductive substance, in the Pfizer vaccine. And it has come from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which has been forced to publish the confidential Pfizer documents by order of the Federal Court in the USA.

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/02/fda-confirms-graphene-is-in-the-covid-vaccines/



The FDA had initially attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years, despite approving the injection after only 108 days of a safety review on December 11th, 2020.

However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

One of the most recent documents published by the FDA saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

The study conclusion is as follows-



In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most interesting about the study is that it confirms on page 7 that reduced Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine because it is needed as a base for the lipid nanoparticles.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –



Thus, it is understood and proven from the documents put forward by the FDA and the manufacturer pfizer that the theory that there is graphene oxide in (so-called) vaccines is not just an urban legend and is true.

It’s 2023, how are you still this ignorant?

Everything we were told is a lie.

It didn't originate in a wet market. It didn't originate in a gain of function lab either. It isn't a disease per se, and it isn't contagious. We didn't need to wear masks, we didn't need to stay 6 ft apart, and especially didn't need to stay indoors.

I am pretty sure I got it, and I'm pretty sure how (because unlike the rest of you, I actually make observations rather than just listening to people). And I am pretty sure how to treat it. But I won't  because I don't believe in pharma, even to save my own life.

So what is it? Ever wonder why it's called COVID 2019 when it came along in 2020? Back in 2019, a US-commie collaboration with China discovered something about our bodies, and used it to seize control. You'll notice most countries with heavy interest in "safety" have tons of people dying, but vaccine or no vaccine (it doesn't work, and came suspiciously soon), people are dying. But where they are dying is important. Nursing homes. Remote villages that could not possibly have anything spread from anywhere, but heard the news and were alarmed. Places where people are shut away from other people and don't get as much exercise and sunlight. Real name?

Chinese
Operatives
"Virus"
Immune
Deficiency
'19

These strung together words make alot more sense if you realize this is how the Chinese language works. Word order is everything.

So, what is it exactly? Vitamin D deficiency. The immune system hasn't the vitamin D that it needs, and the body basically stops synthesizing oxygen. We humans can do very limited photosynthesis (or we'd need plants in constant contact with us, because frankly our HVAC systems are efficient but not that efficient), as I've noticed by the symptoms being relieved when I take my socks off after the sun rises. Remember, the body makes vitamin D from sunlight. That's the extent of our photosynthesis (we can't to it like plants and exhale oxygen, but we can break down CO2 buildup.

COVID's basically CO2 buildup in the lungs and and inability to break it down. They told three true things to us, the rest was lies.
1. You can't breathe or taste
2. It's worse when you're older
3. It's worse when you are suffering from asthma, diabetes, or general inactivity.

But the actual problem? Manufactured by forcing people to stay home. This is why people who were put in isolation, and forced to stay home from their jobs didn't necessarily get better. This was a psyop all along, meant to make people desperately afraid to go out while their governments were taken over by Chinese operatives hostile to freedom.
 You naturally get vitamin D, driving to work and back, driving to shop in places, etc. Living a normal life.

 I'm a writer. I don't get normal sleep, I don't eat healthy, I'm at risk now for type 2 diabetes, and most importantly, I only get sunlight when I do chores outside.
My parents are fine. They tutor part time for income they spend on stuff, they shop, they live their lives in a normal fashion for retired folk. Despite being older than me, they are fine. I'm not. It's not contagious. It's not even a coronavirus.
 It's that alot of people in the same area took it seriously, and they confused correlation for causation. "I must have been within 6 feet of him at some point." They thought something was contagious when in fact it was a glitch in the human body that was exploited by asking people to do something that isn't natural. Work from home, spend all your time in telecommunication like Zoom, and never actually enjoy nature.

You wanna avoid people? Wear a mask? Whatever. God's sake, get some damned sunlight, and take some vitamins.
Don't stay inside! I'm going to die one day. Don't let it be in vain.

Everything we were told is a lie.

Including this statement?

Everything we were told is a lie.

Cool story. My Dad got Covid in January of this year. His Vitamin D was perfect. The Docs didn't recommend D supplements because he was already right where you're supposed to be. Like most things, too much is as bad as too little. I guess that makes your whole story fiction.

Everything we were told is a lie.

It didn't originate in a wet market. It didn't originate in a gain of function lab either. It isn't a disease per se, and it isn't contagious. We didn't need to wear masks, we didn't need to stay 6 ft apart, and especially didn't need to stay indoors.

I am pretty sure I got it, and I'm pretty sure how (because unlike the rest of you, I actually make observations rather than just listening to people). And I am pretty sure how to treat it. But I won't  because I don't believe in pharma, even to save my own life.

So what is it? Ever wonder why it's called COVID 2019 when it came along in 2020? Back in 2019, a US-commie collaboration with China discovered something about our bodies, and used it to seize control. You'll notice most countries with heavy interest in "safety" have tons of people dying, but vaccine or no vaccine (it doesn't work, and came suspiciously soon), people are dying. But where they are dying is important. Nursing homes. Remote villages that could not possibly have anything spread from anywhere, but heard the news and were alarmed. Places where people are shut away from other people and don't get as much exercise and sunlight. Real name?

Chinese
Operatives
"Virus"
Immune
Deficiency
'19

These strung together words make alot more sense if you realize this is how the Chinese language works. Word order is everything.

So, what is it exactly? Vitamin D deficiency. The immune system hasn't the vitamin D that it needs, and the body basically stops synthesizing oxygen. We humans can do very limited photosynthesis (or we'd need plants in constant contact with us, because frankly our HVAC systems are efficient but not that efficient), as I've noticed by the symptoms being relieved when I take my socks off after the sun rises. Remember, the body makes vitamin D from sunlight. That's the extent of our photosynthesis (we can't to it like plants and exhale oxygen, but we can break down CO2 buildup.

COVID's basically CO2 buildup in the lungs and and inability to break it down. They told three true things to us, the rest was lies.
1. You can't breathe or taste
2. It's worse when you're older
3. It's worse when you are suffering from asthma, diabetes, or general inactivity.

But the actual problem? Manufactured by forcing people to stay home. This is why people who were put in isolation, and forced to stay home from their jobs didn't necessarily get better. This was a psyop all along, meant to make people desperately afraid to go out while their governments were taken over by Chinese operatives hostile to freedom.
 You naturally get vitamin D, driving to work and back, driving to shop in places, etc. Living a normal life.

 I'm a writer. I don't get normal sleep, I don't eat healthy, I'm at risk now for type 2 diabetes, and most importantly, I only get sunlight when I do chores outside.
My parents are fine. They tutor part time for income they spend on stuff, they shop, they live their lives in a normal fashion for retired folk. Despite being older than me, they are fine. I'm not. It's not contagious. It's not even a coronavirus.
 It's that alot of people in the same area took it seriously, and they confused correlation for causation. "I must have been within 6 feet of him at some point." They thought something was contagious when in fact it was a glitch in the human body that was exploited by asking people to do something that isn't natural. Work from home, spend all your time in telecommunication like Zoom, and never actually enjoy nature.

You wanna avoid people? Wear a mask? Whatever. God's sake, get some damned sunlight, and take some vitamins.
Don't stay inside! I'm going to die one day. Don't let it be in vain.

That’s a lot of myths to put in one post.

That’s a lot of myths to put in one post.

I’m not sure they even qualify as myths.  More just a stream of total bullshit. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/23/world/europe/chinese-censorship-covid.html

Hopefully scientists will start archiving scientific papers that come out of China, just like I did with this NYT article! https://archive.is/SvfGJ

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/end-of-phe.html

End of the Federal COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) Declaration

4 more days and COVID is finished!

Im waiti g when local hospitals give the all clear and stop hazmatting themselves

Almost there

Congratulations everyone!
Except a certain demographic.

https://theintercept.com/2023/07/12/covid-documents-house-republicans/

https://archive.is/a3GEO

House Republicans on the subcommittee probing the origin of the Covid-19 virus appear to have inadvertently released a trove of new documents related to their investigation that shed light on deliberations among the scientists who drafted a key paper in February and March of 2020. The paper, published in Nature Medicine on March 17, 2020, was titled “The Proximal Origin of Sars-Cov-2” and played a leading role in creating a public impression of a scientific consensus that the virus had emerged naturally in a Chinese “wet market.”

The paper was the subject of a hearing on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, which coincided with the release of a report by the subcommittee devoted to the “Proximal Origin” paper. It contains limited screenshots of emails and Slack messages among the authors, laying out its case that the scientists believed one thing in private, that lab escape was likely, while working to produce a paper saying the opposite in public.

CONSPIRACY! lol