I said the predictions are wrong.
You didn't simply say "the predictions are wrong"!
How many times must you be reminded than you said this:
You can download a program or app that can tell you where and when a planet or star may be. So you can apparently predict that in the year 100,000 Earth may be in 'x' position around the Sun (and all the other planets etc)
But it's wrong
It uses predictions based only on 2 bodies. The Earth and the Sun. No other gravitational influences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
So your current science if full of contradictions and holes.
How could anyone be idiotic enough to claim that "a program or app . . . . can apparently predict that in the year 100,000 Earth may be in 'x' position around the Sun (and all the other planets etc) . . . . based only on 2 bodies. The Earth and the Sun. No other gravitational influences"?
But it's wrong
It uses predictions based only on 2 bodies. The Earth and the Sun. No other gravitational influences."
Do you get this uptight if anyone dares say next weeks weather report is wrong?
Of course not but there's not the remotest connection.
What is totally untrue with your OP is:
your claim that predictions are "based only on 2 bodies. The Earth and the Sun. No other
gravitational influences" and
as a result "current science if full of contradictions and holes".
Both of those are total crap and I'm sure that you know it by now.