As I said to the other member of your close minded collective what data sets or research are you using to produce these wild statements? You are making one major wild assumption and that is that an infinite structure would behave in the same manner as a finite structure!
No, that was entirely you making such a ridiculous wild assumption.
That was the problem from the start.
You acting like an infinite plane would behave just a very large finite plane.
Something you are yet to back up in any way, nor admit is pure nonsense backed up by nothing.
Remember, you were the one who claimed that the infinite mass of an infinite plane would cause it to collapse into a black hole.
The problem for you is that a black hole has a centre.
If it has a centre then there will be a unique position for this infinite plane to collapse into. But symmetry precludes that.
As such, an infinite plane cannot collapse into a black hole.
I’m afraid your simplistic statement regarding forces to be counterbalanced is not actually the case. Read the paper, or go to paragraph 28 onwards.
Perhaps you should actually try and read and understand the paper yourself.
Why say paragraph 28? Why not use a page number? Do you mean equation 28, and the paragraph below which describes 2 particles falling towards the plane, rather than the plane itself?
Better yet, how about you stop relying upon references to try and make your arguments for you and instead make them yourself.
Clearly explain why the arguments from symmetry don't work.
If you disagree with them, EXPLAIN WHY!
Don't just dismiss them.
Now are you going to admit your argument is garbage or actually try to defend it, or just keep on appealing to ignorance while refusing to acknowledge your own?