Try asking fewer questions and you might get better answers.
I just found this forum mainly because i been having a few questions and theories that no one around me seems to take seriously.
1. Why if the sun is so large as NASA says it is does it move across our sky and not fill it?
The sun is a great distance away.
An elephant one metre away would fill your vision but an elephant a kilometre away looks quite small.
2. Why does the sun move like a spot light and even cause light rays similar to a flashlight shown through the surface of water (in a small section) if it is so large?
The Sun does not behave like a spotlight. Its light illuminates just over half the surface of the Earth at any one time.
But a reflection in smooth surface looks about the same size as the object at that distance.
3. Why do people not question that the moon phases could be caused by the same effect that glow in the dark stickers have. They are bright at first but begin to die down over time until you once again spam them with light. Is it possible the moon is on this sort of refill pattern?
Why would they? The phases of the Moon fit well with the fraction of the illuminated half of the moon that we see.
4. How is it if space is where the stars are then why cant the whole of earth see all the stars at once (keep in mind the spin) which would mean we would see different stars all night long.
We do "see different stars all night long" the stars appear to rise from an easterly direction and set in a westerly direction just as the Sun and moon do. The stars to the north or south appear to circle around fixed points it the sky that we call the celestial poles.
For people living on the equator the North Celestial Pole is right on the Northern horizon and the South Celestial Pole is right on the Southern Horizon.
5. Why is the sky blue if space is black? (water is blue)
Air scatters the blue light from the Sun making the Sun slightly yellowish but making the sky appear blue.
Directly overhead the atmosphere in thinnest and the sky is a darker blue because we can see some of the deep black of space through it.
Nearer the horizon we see through a much greater thickness of air (the slant distance) making the sky look a lighter blue.
That even applies to the cold of space.
Right now here the sun is not far from overhead (a bit to the west), the air temperature near the ground is about 35°C but:
the overhead sky temperature measures close to 0°C but near the horizon the sky measures about 13°C.
6. Why does every old work and religion speak of the world as a machine or creation?
Why not?
7. If gravity is true then what is keeping the clouds from falling to earth? What about density?
The clouds are heavy but they are also very huge and their density if not much more than that of air.
They are formed from warm moist air rising until the temperature is low enough for some of the water to condense into extremely tiny droplets, only 50 µm or so, and these can be kept aloft by the very slight updrafts in the cloud.
8. If the earth is round and spinning through space wouldnt that mean everything else would have to be spinning with us at the same velocity? (sun,moon ect)?
We see everything from our perspective and even the one rotation of the Earth takes 24 hours so there is no sense of movement at all.
Apart from the occasional meteor etc the fastest things in the sky are the stars and planets but almost all of the very slow movement is due to the Earth rotation.
9. If the earth is spinning as fast as they claim why do we not simply fly off? I mean things fly off easy here on earth from just a little spin. Also explain why the waters of earth are not spinning and why they seem to seek out a path and remain FLAT on the surface no matter what you do to it.
Simply because we are not spinning fast we are rotating so slowly that the largest acceleration due to the rotation is only 0.3% of gravity and we perceive it simply as a tiny reduction in weight.
10. Why does NASA and other space based agencies always seem to rely on computer graphics, renditions and vague explanations for everything as if they are just branding a idea and selling it?
They don't! There are hundreds of thousands of genuine unretouched photos from space.
NASA and other space based agencies do use computer graphics, renditions and animations to illustrate things that cannot be photographed.
I have yet to see footage that has not been doctored in some way and if you notice when people lose interest they just find another star or planet to attract people back in.
That's your problem but you've undoubtedly seen plenty of "footage that has not been doctored in some way" but refuse to believe it because of some preconceived ideas.
NONE of which can actually be debunked or proven since no one outside the air force or rich could even attempt to fly up that high or have that strong of a scope.
That's hardly the fault of "NASA and other space based agencies". They don't really care what you believe.
None of "NASA and other space based agencies" were set up to convince YOU of anything - take or leave it is all the same to them.