Sandokhan and Gravitation etc

  • 36 Replies
  • 8407 Views
*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #30 on: December 07, 2019, 08:17:30 PM »
>> That applies between magnets, or magnet & iron.
No, between them the force is much greater than gravity.
The gravitational attraction between objects doesn't depend upon what it is made out of and has been observed for many materials.

The lighter object is supposed to hit the earth quicker than the more weight object.
Says who?

*

Danang

  • 6006
  • +31/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #31 on: December 07, 2019, 08:48:01 PM »
This! 8)


Nice photo and interesting scenery but so what?

1. The horizon looks higher than what's supposed to be as described in other approaches.
2. I'm considering to be a tourism salesman in case phewtetic is wrong :o
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/

*

Danang

  • 6006
  • +31/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #32 on: December 07, 2019, 08:48:48 PM »
2. I'm considering to be a tourism salesman in case phewtetic is wrong :o

IMPOSSIBLE!  8)
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/

*

Danang

  • 6006
  • +31/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #33 on: December 07, 2019, 08:51:05 PM »
The lighter object is supposed to hit the earth quicker than the more weight object.
Says who?

Of course vacuum cleaners  8)
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #34 on: December 07, 2019, 08:54:40 PM »
 No.
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #35 on: December 07, 2019, 10:14:42 PM »
1. The horizon looks higher than what's supposed to be as described in other approaches.
2. I'm considering to be a tourism salesman in case phewtetic is wrong :o
1 - Based upon what?
It was clearly taken from a position higher than the top of the rock over there.
2 - Then better get started on being a salesman.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Sandokhan and Gravitation etc
« Reply #36 on: December 07, 2019, 10:44:38 PM »
This! 8)


Nice photo and interesting scenery but so what?

1. The horizon looks higher than what's supposed to be as described in other approaches.
2. I'm considering to be a tourism salesman in case phewtetic is wrong :o
Where should the horizon be - in the middle?  ;D

There's the horizon in the middle of a nice wide panorama!

But really,  the position of the horizon in a photo depends on whether the camera is tilted a little or down, as in your case.
In your photo the camera was tilted down to fit the small bay and natural bridge in.

And the position of the horizon in a photo relative to other objects depends on the height of those objects relative to the camera.

But you'd better get to that tourism salesmen's course and in addition one on photography would help because tourism salesmen might need to take excellent photos of the highlights.
« Last Edit: December 07, 2019, 10:49:17 PM by rabinoz »