Modern science can no longer ignore the calculations performed for the LISA SPACE ANTENNA.

Which in no way support your claims. You are blatantly lying about what it says.

Again, try to find where it clearly declares that there are 2 separate forces, the Coriolis force and the Saganc effect, both of which contribute.

Dr. Ruyong Wang presents TWO FORMULAS FOR THE INTERFEROMETER: ONE FEATURES AN AREA, THE OTHER ONE DOES NOT (ONLY A VELOCITY).

Which are equal. Not 2 magically different shifts, but 2 ways to express the same thing.

But before you just claimed that it was velocity, completely ignoring the fact that your own references provide a formula featuring an area.

The important part you repeatedly overlook is that this is for a FOG rotating about its centre, where there is a single speed for the fibre.

It clearly is not being applied to a ring interferometer rotating about a point away from its centre as then you have multiple velocities to deal with.

As the paper is about FOC, it makes sense that they want to use the form with velocity. But that is not any absolute velocity.

Again, it clearly does not back you up.

For the first time ever, it was acknowledged that the SAGNAC EFFECT measured for the neutrino experiment is actually the CORIOLIS EFFECT.

You mean just like has been pointed out before, THEY ARE THE SAME THING!

Notice how they aren't saying that it is a fundamentally different effect with a different formula?

NO! They are saying the 2 are the same, that the Coriolis effect for objects is known as the Sagnac effect for light.

i.e. they are showing you are wrong, yet again. But you don't care. Even while directly quoting them for all to see your lie, you still blatantly lie about what they are saying and act like they back you up.

Now it dawns on those who study the field of light interferometry that there will always be TWO EFFECTS to deal with for each and every interferometer which is located away from the center of rotation: CORIOLIS EFFECT and the SAGNAC EFFECT.

Again, find a single citation from a reputable source which shows that.

So far all we have to indicate that is yourself.

Meanwhile, the very references you cite instead indicate that they are the same phenomenon.

Again, you are blatantly lying about your own references.

Perhaps a more simple question:

How would you expect such phenomenon to manifest?

Starting nice and simple with experiments everyone can agree on, a circular ring interferometer rotating about its centre.

What shift should be observed?

Is it the Sagnac shift, repeatedly reported to have been observed, with a formula of Deltat=4*A*Omega/c^2, which is equal to 2*v*l/c^2?

Is it the Coriolis effect, with a formula of Deltat=2*v*l/c^2, which is equal to 4*A*Omega/c^2?

Is it both, because they are the same thing?

Or it is both, with both effects manifesting so you have the Sagnac shift, PLUS the Coriolis effect giving a total shift of 8*A*Omega/c^2 = 4*v*l/c^2, WHICH HAS NEVER BEEN OBSERVED?

A related question is what effect does the geometry of the loop has?

Does changing it from a circle to a square effect the shift? No.

So does that mean the formula you claim is for the Sagnac effect is actually variable and dependent upon the shape of the loop such that it always equals the formula you claim is just for the Coriolis effect?