Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?

  • 184 Replies
  • 3680 Views
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #150 on: December 04, 2019, 04:58:38 AM »

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Yeah, I know who they are.

They are people who say something occurred in the 2016 Presidential election involving Russians, who by way of the internet, supposedly influenced the election causing Hillary to lose.

No specifics as to how these RUSSKIES did it, just the mention of these supposed RUSSKIES (REMEMBER...RUSSIA BAD!!!) and the internet...

Yeah, real solid case you got there...

For instance: "Beginning in March, 2016, units of...the GRU hacked the computers and email accounts of the organizations, employees, and volunteers supporting the Clinton Campaign, including the email account of John Podesta. Starting in April of 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the  Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee...The release of the documents was designed and timed to interfere with the 2016 presidential election and undermine the Clinton Campaign."

The question is: How the fuck did any of these actions adversely effect the Clinton Campaign? Hillary Clinton is a known shitbag.

Did any of this BS alleged by Mueller actually have an affect on voters?

The answer: Fuck no.

All 2016, all we heard in MSM? Hillary in a landslide...
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #151 on: December 04, 2019, 05:09:18 AM »
So, Trump is a hypocrite who opens himself up to deserved ridicule. For all his talk, he ends up being guilty of everything he condemns. By his own admission if he himself is to be believed, he is a bad President lol
Unless you have an issue with any of the Executive Orders he has issued, looks like you are a foreign whiner...or wiener...choose...

My bringing up the topic of Executive Order is not an indictment of Obama using the process...no...you see:

Shitbag (i.e., JerkFace, Rayzor, foreign interloper he is) claims the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.

My issue is it took place under the watchful eye of the messiah. You know, the good guy...good ole Uncle Barry...

So my broaching the subject of Executive Order was, rather, an indictment of Obama for failing to act with Executive Order to prevent this supposed Russian Interference, especially since it was SUPPOSEDLY KNOWN TO ALL in March of 2016 the BAD, BAD RUSSKIES had hacked poor Hillary's shit. 
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 05:48:41 AM by totallackey »
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #152 on: December 04, 2019, 05:12:26 AM »
All 2016, all we heard in MSM? Hillary in a landslide...

No one will admit it but this actually helped Hillary to lose. MSM essentially told the voters 'Trump has no chance'.

This galvanised republicans to go out and vote
And conversely had democrats not bother because what's the point?

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #153 on: December 04, 2019, 05:17:58 AM »
Unless you have an issue with any of the Executive Orders he has issued, looks like you are a foreign whiner...or wiener...choose...

It's not that I have an issue or not. I understand its just political games and nonsense. These were Trumps own words.

Quote
"The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”

So of course, when he comes in office, eclipses the amount of executive orders that Obama made (who he criticized for using them) and has an even more incendiary and toxic relationship with the democrats well then what else can you say? Of course people will call him out on his bullshit and hypocrisy. Because that's exactly what it is



Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #154 on: December 04, 2019, 05:36:30 AM »
Unless you have an issue with any of the Executive Orders he has issued, looks like you are a foreign whiner...or wiener...choose...

It's not that I have an issue or not. I understand its just political games and nonsense. These were Trumps own words.

Quote
"The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”

So of course, when he comes in office, eclipses the amount of executive orders that Obama made (who he criticized for using them) and has an even more incendiary and toxic relationship with the democrats well then what else can you say? Of course people will call him out on his bullshit and hypocrisy. Because that's exactly what it is
Again, Trump stated he could shoot somebody on Fifth and not lose a vote.

Rather than utilizing your self-acknowledged miraculous ability to "read between the lines," in this case, you demonstrate your true nature.

People heard all of Trump, re: shooting somebody, re: Executive Orders. They also  were able to ask: "...okay, why did he pull the trigger?" and also saw the nature of the Executive Orders issued by Obama and understood what Trump was saying re: those orders.

People saw the lack of meaningful executive action taken by Obama and the folly of those he did take...hence the agreement with Trump...

So, now you have the full picture.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 05:47:14 AM by totallackey »
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #155 on: December 04, 2019, 05:50:20 AM »
The context of Trump shooting some guy wasn't one of self defence or some arsehole no one likes. It was basically just some random guy.

So now you have the full picture

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38589
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #156 on: December 04, 2019, 07:09:10 AM »
Unless you have an issue with any of the Executive Orders he has issued, looks like you are a foreign whiner...or wiener...choose...

It's not that I have an issue or not. I understand its just political games and nonsense. These were Trumps own words.

Quote
"The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”

So of course, when he comes in office, eclipses the amount of executive orders that Obama made (who he criticized for using them) and has an even more incendiary and toxic relationship with the democrats well then what else can you say? Of course people will call him out on his bullshit and hypocrisy. Because that's exactly what it is
Don't forget when Trump said that he'd be too busy running the country to have time for golf.
https://trumpgolfcount.com/displayoutings
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #157 on: December 04, 2019, 08:28:49 AM »
The context of Trump shooting some guy wasn't one of self defence or some arsehole no one likes. It was basically just some random guy.

So now you have the full picture
Oh, so you are not reading between the lines.

Jesus, you are all over the fucking map.

Everybody asks themselves, "Why am I going to pull the fucking trigger?" prior to pulling the trigger.

Not you though, uh?
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #158 on: December 04, 2019, 08:54:17 AM »
The context of Trump shooting some guy wasn't one of self defence or some arsehole no one likes. It was basically just some random guy.

So now you have the full picture
Oh, so you are not reading between the lines.

Jesus, you are all over the fucking map.

Everybody asks themselves, "Why am I going to pull the fucking trigger?" prior to pulling the trigger.

Not you though, uh?

Trump said "I could stand on New York’s Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and still not lose voters"

So where is the caveats you claim that it is in self defense or something else that makes it legal?

The whole point of the statement was that it was so extreme trying to say how rock solid his 'base' is. That was the point

This is not about "reading between the lines" This is reading exactly how Trump wanted people to read it

You really are dense

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40154
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #159 on: December 04, 2019, 09:54:58 AM »
He's tossing out bait, and people keep taking it.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #160 on: December 04, 2019, 09:58:58 AM »
He's tossing out bait, and people keep taking it.

Yum Yum  :P

*

JerkFace

  • 10156
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #161 on: December 04, 2019, 04:06:12 PM »

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Yeah, I know who they are.

They are people who say something occurred in the 2016 Presidential election involving Russians, who by way of the internet, supposedly influenced the election causing Hillary to lose.

No specifics as to how these RUSSKIES did it, just the mention of these supposed RUSSKIES (REMEMBER...RUSSIA BAD!!!) and the internet...

Yeah, real solid case you got there...

For instance: "Beginning in March, 2016, units of...the GRU hacked the computers and email accounts of the organizations, employees, and volunteers supporting the Clinton Campaign, including the email account of John Podesta. Starting in April of 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the  Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee...The release of the documents was designed and timed to interfere with the 2016 presidential election and undermine the Clinton Campaign."

The question is: How the fuck did any of these actions adversely effect the Clinton Campaign? Hillary Clinton is a known shitbag.

Did any of this BS alleged by Mueller actually have an affect on voters?

The answer: Fuck no.

All 2016, all we heard in MSM? Hillary in a landslide...

You missed the point completely.   

Suppose you get shot at by someone trying to kill you.   You duck and they miss.   So no crime has been committed by your logic.

As it happens the millions of Russian bots and trolls did have a significant effect in shaping the election result with micro targetted ads and fake campaigns like those fake BLM guys who turned out to be paid Nigerians.  Or the fake pro islamic facebook groups designed to stir up outrage. 

The Russians are shooting at you dumbass GOP supporting Americans yet again.   Don't forget to duck.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #162 on: December 06, 2019, 11:43:00 AM »

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Yeah, I know who they are.

They are people who say something occurred in the 2016 Presidential election involving Russians, who by way of the internet, supposedly influenced the election causing Hillary to lose.

No specifics as to how these RUSSKIES did it, just the mention of these supposed RUSSKIES (REMEMBER...RUSSIA BAD!!!) and the internet...

Yeah, real solid case you got there...

For instance: "Beginning in March, 2016, units of...the GRU hacked the computers and email accounts of the organizations, employees, and volunteers supporting the Clinton Campaign, including the email account of John Podesta. Starting in April of 2016, the GRU hacked into the computer networks of the  Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the Democratic National Committee...The release of the documents was designed and timed to interfere with the 2016 presidential election and undermine the Clinton Campaign."

The question is: How the fuck did any of these actions adversely effect the Clinton Campaign? Hillary Clinton is a known shitbag.

Did any of this BS alleged by Mueller actually have an affect on voters?

The answer: Fuck no.

All 2016, all we heard in MSM? Hillary in a landslide...

You missed the point completely.   

Suppose you get shot at by someone trying to kill you.   You duck and they miss.   So no crime has been committed by your logic.

As it happens the millions of Russian bots and trolls did have a significant effect in shaping the election result with micro targetted ads and fake campaigns like those fake BLM guys who turned out to be paid Nigerians.  Or the fake pro islamic facebook groups designed to stir up outrage. 

The Russians are shooting at you dumbass GOP supporting Americans yet again.   Don't forget to duck.
Nothing typed or spoken by anyone on the Internet had any effect on the 2016 you ignoramus.

People located all across the country voted against Hillary Clinton.

They didn't need a fucked up foreign shitbag to tell them to do that.

Hillary Clinton is lying douchebag and everyone knows that.

You keep peddling that BS though...nothing wrong with practicing your sole talent.
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38589
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #163 on: December 06, 2019, 01:09:59 PM »
Nothing typed or spoken by anyone on the Internet had any effect on the 2016 you ignoramus.
I bet that the campaign directors will be bummed to hear that their internet advertising budgets were a complete waste of money.

People located all across the country voted against Hillary Clinton.
And more people located all across the country voted for Hillary Clinton, but the Electoral College system happened to work against her.

They didn't need a fucked up foreign shitbag to tell them to do that.
To be fair, it can bet pretty hard to tell the difference between a foreign shitbag and an American shitbag on the internet.

Hillary Clinton is lying douchebag and everyone knows that.
So is Trump, but you already knew that. ;)

You keep peddling that BS though...nothing wrong with practicing your sole talent.
It looks as if you're speaking from experience.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2019, 01:18:33 PM by markjo »
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #164 on: December 06, 2019, 01:39:55 PM »
Trump is my man crush

We get it. Also, we know your an alt of a regular here and just likes to get others worked up by saying utterly ridiculous crap

My moneys on boydster. I don't trust that guy


*

JerkFace

  • 10156
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #165 on: December 06, 2019, 04:54:21 PM »

Nothing typed or spoken by anyone on the Internet had any effect on the 2016 you ignoramus.


I could argue otherwise,  but that's not the point I was making. 

Russia conducted a sophisticated and divisive social media campaign against the USA electoral system.

That's not in question.    Whether is succeded or not is not the point. 

America got hacked,  big-time,  and I can understand you want to deny it,  but hiding your heads in the sand, isn't going to work.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #166 on: December 07, 2019, 02:32:35 AM »
Just for shits . . . show of hands . . . who among you were influenced by the Ruskies?
Not a single one of you, but you believe everyone else was duped.

Oh, the delusional arrogance.   :)
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

JerkFace

  • 10156
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #167 on: December 07, 2019, 03:41:35 AM »
Just for shits . . . show of hands . . . who among you were influenced by the Ruskies?
Not a single one of you, but you believe everyone else was duped.

Oh, the delusional arrogance.   :)

Seems you were one of those who forgot to duck.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #168 on: December 07, 2019, 03:55:49 AM »
Just for shits . . . show of hands . . . who among you were influenced by the Ruskies?
Not a single one of you, but you believe everyone else was duped.

Oh, the delusional arrogance.   :)

Seems you were one of those who forgot to duck.

Uhhh, you need to explain that one to me.
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38589
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #169 on: December 07, 2019, 11:14:38 AM »
Just for shits . . . show of hands . . . who among you were influenced by the Ruskies?
I'm not on FaceBook and don't follow Twitter, so I was not influenced.  Well, except maybe by some of the Russki moles on this site.  :-\
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #170 on: December 07, 2019, 12:49:30 PM »
That's the thing, everyone knows they were not influenced,
but, for some reason, believe everyone else was.

RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38589
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #171 on: December 07, 2019, 01:02:49 PM »
They didn't have to influence everyone else.  The race was tight enough where they only had to influence a relative few in key battleground states.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Shifter

  • 11445
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #172 on: December 07, 2019, 07:15:44 PM »
They didn't have to influence everyone else.  The race was tight enough where they only had to influence a relative few in key battleground states.

Their very attempt (even if it was a failure) is intolerable. America should stand up to this instead of thinking 'no one would be stupid enough to fall for that

I mean utterly ridiculous crap like Clinton being the ring leader of a paedo ring was making the rounds. A swining voter bombarded with this along with every other' seemingly legitimate ad' might make up their mind.

We say we don't get influenced by things we read online but people do. Look at anti vaxxers. Or vegans :P

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #173 on: December 07, 2019, 10:08:45 PM »
We have members here from countries other than the USofA sharing their opinions of our political system.

Should they be banned?

RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

JerkFace

  • 10156
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #174 on: December 08, 2019, 12:32:37 AM »
We have members here from countries other than the USofA sharing their opinions of our political system.

Should they be banned?

Only if one of the candidates is prepared to bribe me.   Just a heads up,  I don't work cheap.    ( 400 million in military aid is the market rate currently )

On the other hand,  I'll consider any quid pro quo you might be able to offer.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #175 on: December 08, 2019, 12:47:33 AM »
I'll give you $12US to parrot my views.


Deal?
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40154
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #176 on: December 08, 2019, 06:44:00 AM »
Everyone likes to believe they can't be influenced by propaganda, but that's the way it works. We are influenced and don't know it. There would be no commercials if it didn't work.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Bullwinkle

  • Flat Earth Curator
  • 17238
  • "Umm, WTF ???"
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #177 on: December 08, 2019, 07:13:37 AM »
Everyone likes to believe they can't be influenced by propaganda, but that's the way it works. We are influenced and don't know it. There would be no commercials if it didn't work.

DVR  FF
RE can never win this argument.
FE can't be disproved.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #178 on: December 08, 2019, 03:06:48 PM »
Clinton says the RUSSKIES...

US voters said you should not have rigged the primary.

End of story.

All you foreign shitbags gfy.
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

JerkFace

  • 10156
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #179 on: December 08, 2019, 04:04:54 PM »
I'll give you $12US to parrot my views.


Deal?

So as a resident of San Diego, you are declaring your candidacy for Duncan Hunter's seat in congress?    I have dirt on Duncan Hunter that will put him in jail if you are prepared to pay for it.

Oh wait..... shit!


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.