Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?

  • 197 Replies
  • 10350 Views
*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 19355
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #120 on: November 30, 2019, 02:44:19 AM »

Didn't you read the indictments?

An indictment is not evidence.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #121 on: November 30, 2019, 03:30:33 AM »

Didn't you read the indictments?

An indictment is not evidence.

Yes it is.  It is sworn testimony before a grand jury.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #122 on: November 30, 2019, 06:22:01 AM »

Didn't you read the indictments?

An indictment is not evidence.

Yes it is.  It is sworn testimony before a grand jury.
No it isn't.

An indictment is a court action.

Again,  independent evidence from a source that has not been shown to have committed misinformation and disinformation campaigns would be nice.

Anything tied to 5 eyes is highly suspect.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #123 on: November 30, 2019, 06:29:46 PM »

Didn't you read the indictments?

An indictment is not evidence.

Yes it is.  It is sworn testimony before a grand jury.
No it isn't.

An indictment is a court action.

Again,  independent evidence from a source that has not been shown to have committed misinformation and disinformation campaigns would be nice.

Anything tied to 5 eyes is highly suspect.

So you haven't read the supporting evidence in the grand jury indictment?   https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

I suggest you do. 

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #124 on: December 01, 2019, 01:55:33 AM »

Didn't you read the indictments?

An indictment is not evidence.

Yes it is.  It is sworn testimony before a grand jury.
No it isn't.

An indictment is a court action.

Again,  independent evidence from a source that has not been shown to have committed misinformation and disinformation campaigns would be nice.

Anything tied to 5 eyes is highly suspect.

So you haven't read the supporting evidence in the grand jury indictment?   https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download

I suggest you do.
Why do you choose to trust anything offered by proven liars?

Aside from that alone, please help the reading audience by specifically stating exactly how any actions taken by the bad, bad RUSSIANS actually did anything to have a deleterious effect on the 2016 election.

What specific difference is there between what they did and say, you posting your opinions about US politics here or anywhere else on the internet?
« Last Edit: December 01, 2019, 02:02:53 AM by totallackey »

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #125 on: December 01, 2019, 05:49:40 AM »

Why do you choose to trust anything offered by proven liars?


If you lie to the grand jury you will end up being charged with perjury and likely go to jail.

The only people who got charged with lying are Trump campaign people.  Even Roger Stone,  proved that Trump himself lied in his written testimony.

What are the chances Trump will get charged with perjury when he leaves office?
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #126 on: December 01, 2019, 08:13:03 AM »

Why do you choose to trust anything offered by proven liars?


If you lie to the grand jury you will end up being charged with perjury and likely go to jail.

The only people who got charged with lying are Trump campaign people.  Even Roger Stone,  proved that Trump himself lied in his written testimony.

What are the chances Trump will get charged with perjury when he leaves office?
About the same as you posting something sane on these boards.

Now, again...explain, in detail, specifically...what have any of these mysterious Russkies done that is substantially different from the BS you post here each and every day of the year?

AFAF...
« Last Edit: December 01, 2019, 01:48:10 PM by totallackey »

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 43013
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #127 on: December 01, 2019, 01:25:30 PM »
I knew it, Jerkface has thousands of fake Twitter accounts!
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #128 on: December 01, 2019, 03:31:05 PM »
I knew it, Jerkface has thousands of fake Twitter accounts!

Just so long as they don't find out about the millions I funnelled to the GOP through the NRA and the money I paid Fox News to spread disinfo.

Putin:Gabbard 2020
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 19355
  • Standard Idiot
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #129 on: December 01, 2019, 06:30:23 PM »
President should be picked at random like jury duty.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #130 on: December 01, 2019, 09:40:00 PM »
I knew it, Jerkface has thousands of fake Twitter accounts!

Just so long as they don't find out about the millions I funnelled to the GOP through the NRA and the money I paid Fox News to spread disinfo.

Putin:Gabbard 2020
Won't answer the question.

Busted.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #131 on: December 01, 2019, 09:51:17 PM »
President should be picked at random like jury duty.

Why not,  couldn't be any worse than someone Putin controls.
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #132 on: December 02, 2019, 12:26:21 AM »

Won't answer the question.

Busted.

Seems you still didn't actually read the evidence you asked for.   Busted
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #133 on: December 02, 2019, 05:09:58 AM »

Won't answer the question.

Busted.

Seems you still didn't actually read the evidence you asked for.   Busted
Yeah, I read everything you provided.

One, you got Five Eyes teling me something...

Two, I got you performing as a foreign agent here on an internet forum.

The questions once again:

Why believe anything a proven liar (i.e., the CIA or FBI) tells you?

Two, what is wrong with Russians offering political opinions?

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #134 on: December 02, 2019, 03:25:39 PM »
Why believe anything a proven liar (i.e., the CIA or FBI) tells you?

You means besides the witnesses and documentary evidence?

Two, what is wrong with Russians offering political opinions?

Lies and divisive propaganda aren't opinions, they are tools to attack and divide,  (spoiler alert:  it worked).

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 40545
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #135 on: December 02, 2019, 05:11:12 PM »
Why do you choose to trust anything offered by proven liars?
Good question.  Why do you trust anything offered by proven liar Donald Trump?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #136 on: December 03, 2019, 03:46:23 AM »
Why believe anything a proven liar (i.e., the CIA or FBI) tells you?

You means besides the witnesses and documentary evidence?
Witnesses?

Please provide a list of witnesses in the indictment...

Two, what is wrong with Russians offering political opinions?

Lies and divisive propaganda aren't opinions, they are tools to attack and divide,  (spoiler alert:  it worked).
What lies?

What propaganda?
« Last Edit: December 03, 2019, 03:59:20 AM by totallackey »

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #137 on: December 03, 2019, 03:59:14 AM »
Please provide a list of witnesses in the indictment...

Heres a start...

1. Ali, Hesham
2. Ayliff, Philip
3. Brennan, James
4. Day, John
5. DeLuca, Douglas
6. Devine, Tad
7. Duggan, Donna
8. Evenson, Darin
9. Gates, Richard
10. Holland, Wayne
11. Jacobson, Stephen
12. James, Melinda
13. Katzman, Maximillian
14. Kirimca, Irfan
15. Laporta, Cindy
16. LaPorte, Kevin
17. Liss, Paula
18. Magionos, Morgan
19. Maxwell, Joel
20. Metzler, Amanda
21. Miceli, Peggy
22. Michael, Renee
23. Mikuska, Matthew
24. O’Brien, Conor
25. Opsut, Daniel
26. Rabin, Daniel
27. Raico, Dennis
28. Regolizio, Michael
29. Rodriguez, Taryn
30. Seferian, Gary
31. Sullivan, Stacey
32. Trusko, Alex
33. Wall, Ronald
34. Washkuhn, Heather
35. Welch, Michael

There are others,  what would you like?

Michael Cohen?    Steve Bannon?     

What lies?
What propaganda?

Here is a start.

https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/f5fe536c-81bb-45be-86e5-a9fee9794664/note/a8d336ef-e98d-4a08-987d-b4c154b22700.pdf

But you'd already know from the IRA indictments,  the type of disinfo campaign they are running..




Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #138 on: December 03, 2019, 04:01:21 AM »
Please provide a list of witnesses in the indictment...

Heres a start...

1. Ali, Hesham
2. Ayliff, Philip
3. Brennan, James
4. Day, John
5. DeLuca, Douglas
6. Devine, Tad
7. Duggan, Donna
8. Evenson, Darin
9. Gates, Richard
10. Holland, Wayne
11. Jacobson, Stephen
12. James, Melinda
13. Katzman, Maximillian
14. Kirimca, Irfan
15. Laporta, Cindy
16. LaPorte, Kevin
17. Liss, Paula
18. Magionos, Morgan
19. Maxwell, Joel
20. Metzler, Amanda
21. Miceli, Peggy
22. Michael, Renee
23. Mikuska, Matthew
24. O’Brien, Conor
25. Opsut, Daniel
26. Rabin, Daniel
27. Raico, Dennis
28. Regolizio, Michael
29. Rodriguez, Taryn
30. Seferian, Gary
31. Sullivan, Stacey
32. Trusko, Alex
33. Wall, Ronald
34. Washkuhn, Heather
35. Welch, Michael

There are others,  what would you like?

Michael Cohen?    Steve Bannon?     

What lies?
What propaganda?

Here is a start.

https://games-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/default/documents/f5fe536c-81bb-45be-86e5-a9fee9794664/note/a8d336ef-e98d-4a08-987d-b4c154b22700.pdf

But you'd already know from the IRA indictments,  the type of disinfo campaign they are running..
Who are these fine, upstanding people you provided?

What do you knw of them?

Who do they work for?

Mueller report?

Really?

What a joke...

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #139 on: December 03, 2019, 04:04:06 AM »

Who are these fine, upstanding people you provided?

What do you knw of them?

Who do they work for?

Mueller report?

Really?

What a joke...

Have you read the Mueller report?   
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #140 on: December 03, 2019, 05:43:35 AM »

Who are these fine, upstanding people you provided?

What do you knw of them?

Who do they work for?

Mueller report?

Really?

What a joke...

Have you read the Mueller report?   
Yep.

Have you?

The Mueller Report alleges the Obama Administration was in charge of US Security during the alleged 2016 Russian interference.

Why wasn't anyone charged in the Obama Administration for failing to protect the election, as they were sworn to do...Do you support such ineptitude at these sacred levels of government?

You probably do.

You probably supported the early release of that terrorist in London.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2019, 05:48:26 AM by totallackey »

*

Shifter

  • 15865
  • Flat Earth Believer
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #141 on: December 03, 2019, 06:30:14 AM »

Who are these fine, upstanding people you provided?

What do you knw of them?

Who do they work for?

Mueller report?

Really?

What a joke...

Have you read the Mueller report?   
Yep.

Have you?

The Mueller Report alleges the Obama Administration was in charge of US Security during the alleged 2016 Russian interference.

Why wasn't anyone charged in the Obama Administration for failing to protect the election, as they were sworn to do...Do you support such ineptitude at these sacred levels of government?

You probably do.

You probably supported the early release of that terrorist in London.

I also wonder why Facebook and Cambridge Analytica dont also share a portion of the blame. Is it because one is America itself and the other comes from an allied country? Easier to blame the Ruskis I guess, but lets not forget those that facilitated it all.



RIP rabinoz. Forum legend

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #142 on: December 03, 2019, 06:48:13 AM »
Yep.

I don't think you have.  If you'd understood it,  you'd know who those witnesses were.

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #143 on: December 03, 2019, 08:31:24 AM »
Yep.

I don't think you have.  If you'd understood it,  you'd know who those witnesses were.

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Obama was a big fan of Executive Orders...

Funny he did not choose that option , don't you think?

Oh, I forgot, he clearly stated to Medvedev, "Tell Vladimir..."
« Last Edit: December 04, 2019, 04:26:17 AM by totallackey »

*

Stash

  • 6342
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #144 on: December 03, 2019, 11:53:16 AM »
Yep.

I don't think you have.  If you'd understood it,  you'd know who those witnesses were.

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Obama was a big fan of Executive Orders...

“The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”


https://apnews.com/25ca8d3b39024f9e828df7ebeb718274

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 43013
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #145 on: December 03, 2019, 02:29:35 PM »
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10953
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #146 on: December 03, 2019, 03:31:28 PM »
Jerkface https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1201931955002052608?s=20

lol

Wow,  Tulsi is a democratic candidate with GOP support? 

Oh,  and bye bye Kamala.  :)
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Shifter

  • 15865
  • Flat Earth Believer
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #147 on: December 03, 2019, 08:24:09 PM »
Jerkface https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1201931955002052608?s=20

lol

Wow,  Tulsi is a democratic candidate with GOP support? 

Oh,  and bye bye Kamala.  :)

Not sure how she ever thought she was electable. I wonder if she's proud of the attempted character assassinations and division she did to whoever does get nominated in her futile attempt for power.

She has an ice cold heart and won't be missed
RIP rabinoz. Forum legend

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #148 on: December 04, 2019, 04:26:38 AM »
Yep.

I don't think you have.  If you'd understood it,  you'd know who those witnesses were.

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Obama was a big fan of Executive Orders...

“The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”


https://apnews.com/25ca8d3b39024f9e828df7ebeb718274
So?

*

Shifter

  • 15865
  • Flat Earth Believer
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #149 on: December 04, 2019, 04:31:23 AM »
Yep.

I don't think you have.  If you'd understood it,  you'd know who those witnesses were.

As for Obama,  he was blocked from taking bipartisan action by McConnell,   I thought you would have known that?
Obama was a big fan of Executive Orders...

“The country wasn’t based on executive orders,” Trump said at a South Carolina campaign stop in February 2016. “Right now, Obama goes around signing executive orders. He can’t even get along with the Democrats, and he goes around signing all these executive orders. It’s a basic disaster. You can’t do it.”


https://apnews.com/25ca8d3b39024f9e828df7ebeb718274
So?

So, Trump is a hypocrite who opens himself up to deserved ridicule. For all his talk, he ends up being guilty of everything he condemns. By his own admission if he himself is to be believed, he is a bad President lol
RIP rabinoz. Forum legend