Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?

  • 168 Replies
  • 3123 Views
*

Pezevenk

  • 13585
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #90 on: October 30, 2019, 01:15:47 AM »
Wall of blue text

You forgot to answer.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Pezevenk

  • 13585
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #91 on: October 30, 2019, 01:17:09 AM »
When did I mention the 1974 negotiations?    You were the one who introduced Kissinger to the debate. 
And then you started talking about Kissinger, and the negotiations. It's not my fault you confuse yourself when you jump to whatever conversation suits you.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Pezevenk

  • 13585
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #92 on: October 30, 2019, 01:17:56 AM »
LOL.  I was thinking of trying to engage you in a discussion,  but I'm getting the feeling you are already a lost cause.  Try getting out more.
When confronted with sources, JerkFace screams incoherently.

LOL,  projecting.
Still forgot to answer.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #93 on: October 30, 2019, 02:13:16 AM »
When did I mention the 1974 negotiations?    You were the one who introduced Kissinger to the debate. 
And then you started talking about Kissinger, and the negotiations. It's not my fault you confuse yourself when you jump to whatever conversation suits you.

Correct,  it's not your fault that you are ignorant of Syrian history.  But you could at least make an effort to learn a little bit.  Or, you could go on thinking you know it all.

Oh wait....

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #94 on: October 30, 2019, 04:14:41 PM »
Tulsi Gabbard is planning a spoiler campaign.  I'm wondering if that might backfire, and she takes votes from Trump,  rather than the Dems.

Quote
It is in Gabbard’s interest to conflate the charge that she is working on behalf of the Republicans with the charge that she’s working on behalf of the Russians. The former is apparent, while the latter is impossible to prove. Gabbard has taken some strident foreign-policy stances that follow no apparent American dovish objective, and do line up with Russian goals. While Gabbard presents herself as a noninterventionist, she bizarrely attacked the Obama administration for failing to bomb Al Qaeda in Syria, while crediting Russia for allegedly doing so:

Quote
In fact, nothing could do more to vindicate Clinton’s suspicion that Gabbard is being groomed by the Republican party as a spoiler candidate than a Wall Street Journal op-ed previewing her case for a spoiler campaign.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/10/tulsi-gabbard-third-party-campaign-russia-spoiler.html
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #95 on: October 31, 2019, 10:40:35 AM »
https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1189953841707573248?s=20
Quote
Ann Coulter
@AnnCoulter
No she didn't.  Tulsi is a SENATOR, meaning she's in the SENATE and doesn't vote on HOUSE resolutions.

This was a reply to this tweet -
 
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1189941618276782081?s=20
Quote
Catturd
@catturd2
For all you foolish Tulsi Gabbard fans ...

She just voted for the illegal impeachment coup.

She's just a better looking Nancy Pelosi.

Ann Coulter doesn't know that Tulsi is a rep.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #96 on: October 31, 2019, 05:18:13 PM »
https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1189953841707573248?s=20
Quote
Ann Coulter
@AnnCoulter
No she didn't.  Tulsi is a SENATOR, meaning she's in the SENATE and doesn't vote on HOUSE resolutions.

This was a reply to this tweet -
 
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1189941618276782081?s=20
Quote
Catturd
@catturd2
For all you foolish Tulsi Gabbard fans ...

She just voted for the illegal impeachment coup.

She's just a better looking Nancy Pelosi.

Ann Coulter doesn't know that Tulsi is a rep.

I admit to not knowing much about Ann Coulter,  now I wish I didn't bother to find out.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13585
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #97 on: November 03, 2019, 04:52:19 PM »
Correct,  it's not your fault that you are ignorant of Syrian history.  But you could at least make an effort to learn a little bit.  Or, you could go on thinking you know it all.

Oh wait....
That's really rich coming from the person that has been mixing up things that happened years apart post after post after post.

Still avoided to answer substantially though.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #98 on: November 11, 2019, 03:02:20 PM »
Interesting angle by Nate Silver,  If Gabbard runs as a 3rd party spoiler,  there is a strong chance she will split the conservative vote, rather than the Dems.

Quote
Lest you make the mistake that Tulsi Gabbard's support is coming from the left, almost all of her support in the Q-Pac poll of NH is from voters who describe themselves as conservative or moderate. And almost all from independents and not Democrats.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1193986420039454721
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #99 on: November 23, 2019, 06:14:18 PM »
Anybody still think Tulsi Gabbard isn't being promoted by the Russians?


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • Planar Moderator
  • 9750
  • V is for Viceroy
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #100 on: November 24, 2019, 09:47:20 AM »
Upon further reflection I really don't have a good reason to dislike Tulsi Gabbard.  Perhaps if I research it I'll find a reason but the best that I can think of is that she seems very unpleasant.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #101 on: November 24, 2019, 09:56:32 AM »
What I don't understand is why. Why are the Russians promoting her? Nobody thinks she has a chance to win the primaries.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Shifter

  • 11364
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #102 on: November 24, 2019, 03:39:52 PM »
What I don't understand is why. Why are the Russians promoting her? Nobody thinks she has a chance to win the primaries.

2 that I can think of

When she loses more people end up getting upset. = unhappier America.

Votes for her aren't necessarily votes for candidates Russians don't want to see get up

I am sure the Ruskis are also trashing her at the same time elsewhere. Trying to divide America.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #103 on: November 24, 2019, 03:48:55 PM »
What I don't understand is why. Why are the Russians promoting her? Nobody thinks she has a chance to win the primaries.

The are grooming her as a third party spoiler,  this is the stage where they lay the ground work,  and later they crank up the disinfo campaign.

Think Jill Stein 2020.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #104 on: November 24, 2019, 04:00:53 PM »
Right, except she appeals more to Trump voters than Dem voters. Maybe the Russians want him to lose now.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Shifter

  • 11364
  • ASI
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #105 on: November 24, 2019, 04:12:30 PM »
Right, except she appeals more to Trump voters than Dem voters. Maybe the Russians want him to lose now.

I think the Russians just like bri going chaos to what would otherwise be something orderly.

Look at the state of your politics. Look at how polarized people are. You're divided, hence weaker

*

Crouton

  • Flat Earth Inspector General of High Fashion Crimes and Misdemeanors
  • Planar Moderator
  • 9750
  • V is for Viceroy
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #106 on: November 24, 2019, 04:38:57 PM »
The Russians pretty much always fuck with our elections.  Sometimes they like a particular candidate.  Often it's to attack democracy itself.
Intelligentia et magnanimitas vincvnt violentiam et desperationem.
The truth behind NASA's budget

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #107 on: November 24, 2019, 04:55:12 PM »
Right, except she appeals more to Trump voters than Dem voters. Maybe the Russians want him to lose now.

Nate Silver's interpretation is that she is pulling independant voters from Trump,   that could hurt both Trump and the MOM-Celine ticket.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1193986420039454721
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #108 on: November 24, 2019, 06:37:41 PM »
I will fight Tulsi Gabbard!

I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #109 on: November 24, 2019, 07:33:38 PM »
I will fight Tulsi Gabbard!

Do you have any close relatives with shady business dealings in Ukraine?    Thats a pre-requisite these days.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #110 on: November 26, 2019, 01:01:46 PM »


She's on JRE. Pretty interesting.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #111 on: November 26, 2019, 06:00:46 PM »


She's on JRE. Pretty interesting.

Interesting Interview,  they didn't ask any hard questions tho. 


MOM:TULSI 2020

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40108
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #112 on: November 26, 2019, 06:51:34 PM »
We will take down the evil Clinton empire once and for all.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #113 on: November 26, 2019, 11:06:19 PM »
We will take down the evil Clinton empire once and for all.

LOL,  I think there is a queue.  Just be careful you don't get suicided in the back of the head.   ( jumping in ahead of BHS )



Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #114 on: November 27, 2019, 04:46:20 AM »
Anybody still think Tulsi Gabbard isn't being promoted by the Russians?



What is wrong with Russia?
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #115 on: November 27, 2019, 02:04:17 PM »
What is wrong with Russia?

You mean apart from them conducting massive disinfo campaigns to divide and disrupt? 





Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

DuckDodgers

  • One Duck to Rule Them All
  • 5063
  • What's supposed to go here?
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #116 on: November 27, 2019, 03:04:06 PM »
Or them orchestrating massive hacking operations which lead to the theft of millions of americans having their identity compromised?
markjo, what force can not pass through a solid or liquid?
Magnetism for one and electric is the other.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #117 on: November 29, 2019, 08:21:31 AM »
What is wrong with Russia?

You mean apart from them conducting massive disinfo campaigns to divide and disrupt?
Aside from other known agencies proven to have conducted misinformation and disinformation campaigns, what evidence do you have Russians are doing this?
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #118 on: November 29, 2019, 08:22:17 AM »
Or them orchestrating massive hacking operations which lead to the theft of millions of americans having their identity compromised?
Independent evidence would be good.
The NIST report(s) never went through what we would call peer review (Much like an FAA crash report doesn't either). But reports based upon NIST findings have.

*

JerkFace

  • 10145
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #119 on: November 29, 2019, 03:16:40 PM »

Aside from other known agencies proven to have conducted misinformation and disinformation campaigns, what evidence do you have Russians are doing this?

Didn't you read the indictments?    https://www.justice.gov/file/1035477/download


Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.