Gravity

Given that the FE explanation for the sensation commonly known as gravity (Earth is accelerating upwards) is based primarily on Einstein's theories of relativity, why don't you accept any of the rest of his work?  
In other words, isn't it hypocritical to accept a small part of modern science simply because it is compatible with your theory, but reject virtually all else?

Oh, and just out of curiosity, what do FE people believe is outside the dome of the sky? and how did this Earth come to be?

Get a life. In case you didn't notice, this guy is on your side.

i just posted it cause i thought it was funny

but how does that suggest i don't have a life?

Quote from: "(S)aint"

Get a life. In case you didn't notice, this guy is on your side.

get a life? coming from you? what are you going to challenge everyone in halo now?

but how does that suggest i don't have a life?

It doesn't. When I say that, it more or less means "Don't you have something better to do?".

get a life? coming from you? what are you going to challenge everyone in halo now?

Nope. I haven't played halo in several months now. I just use this name because I have been using it since 2002 (I think), and I don't feel like making up a new one.

if thats your name in halo

i think i've played with you  :shock:

if thats your name in halo

i think i've played with you  :shock:

I don't have Xbox live.

You kids have completely spammed up a very relevant question.

Good point.

Getting back on topic, Gravity does not exist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Cavendish

If I was looking for ignorant opinions, I would have saved everyone the
trouble of reading this and just PM'd you  :twisted:

Quote from: "(S)aint"

if thats your name in halo

i think i've played with you  :shock:

I don't have Xbox live.

oh

cuz there's like another dude with that name

theres also a guy in cs with that name

Unless this gets back to its original topic very soon, it's going to Angry Ranting. In an effort to do just that, I'll answer the OP's questions.

Given that the FE explanation for the sensation commonly known as gravity (Earth is accelerating upwards) is based primarily on Einstein's theories of relativity, why don't you accept any of the rest of his work?

We do, unless you can cite any of Einstein's work that isn't compatible with FE.

In other words, isn't it hypocritical to accept a small part of modern science simply because it is compatible with your theory, but reject virtually all else?

We only reject that which is both incompatible, and could reasonably be faked by the conspiracy.

Oh, and just out of curiosity, what do FE people believe is outside the dome of the sky?

Space. Stars, the Sun, the Moon, the planets.

and how did this Earth come to be?

We aren't sure, but Dogplatter has some interesting theories.

cavendish experiment = proof that FE acceleration gravity crap is BOLLOX

Given that the FE explanation for the sensation commonly known as gravity (Earth is accelerating upwards) is based primarily on Einstein's theories of relativity, why don't you accept any of the rest of his work?  
In other words, isn't it hypocritical to accept a small part of modern science simply because it is compatible with your theory, but reject virtually all else?

Oh, and just out of curiosity, what do FE people believe is outside the dome of the sky? and how did this Earth come to be?

He was right about some things, but wrong about some others. Like his Theory of Everything which he spent the last half of his life trying unsuccessfully to get right. And outside of the earth's atmosphere is, I believe, the sun and moon. The sun and moon are approximatly 3,000 miles in diameter.

cavendish experiment = proof that FE acceleration gravity crap is BOLLOX

You spelt "Bullocks" wrong.

*Nibbles on kitten*

cavendish experiment = proof that FE acceleration gravity crap is BOLLOX

Hmm, 'cause I say gravity=acceleration.

Quote from: "Ezkerraldean"

cavendish experiment = proof that FE acceleration gravity crap is BOLLOX

Hmm, 'cause I say gravity=acceleration.

how can FE acceleration cause things to be gravitationally attracted to eachother in a direction perpendicular to the FE's aceleration? please explain this or accept that you are all wrong.

This is the 12th topic with the title of "Gravity".

This is the 12th topic with the title of "Gravity".

The More You Know™

This is the 12th topic with the title of "Gravity".

And I thought my topic "The Truth About FE Gravity" would stop these threads.  Guess not.

And I thought my topic "The Truth About FE Gravity" would stop these threads.  Guess not.

There should be a link to it in the FAQ. Oh wait, nobody reads the FAQ anyway. :roll:

There should be a link to it in the FAQ. Oh wait, nobody reads the FAQ anyway. :roll:

It might help to say which FAQ they should read (probably not, though).  There is a "FAQ" button right there on the top menu bar that has little to do with any kind of earth.  

I just had an idea!  There should be a test based on the FAQ as part of the registration process!  I'm so smart.  S-M-R-T  Smart!

Quote from: "Masterchief2219"

There should be a link to it in the FAQ. Oh wait, nobody reads the FAQ anyway. :roll:

It might help to say which FAQ they should read (probably not, though).  There is a "FAQ" button right there on the top menu bar that has little to do with any kind of earth.  

I just had an idea!  There should be a test based on the FAQ as part of the registration process!  I'm so smart.  S-M-R-T  Smart!

i read the part with the conspiracy. i asked some questions. one fe responded and he said he doesn't approve it(the faq). funny isn't it?

It might help to say which FAQ they should read (probably not, though).  There is a "FAQ" button right there on the top menu bar that has little to do with any kind of earth.  

What do you think would help solve this problem?  Perhaps the appropriate FAQ should be labelled as "Flat Earth FAQ", with the additional admonition, "READ BEFORE POSTING"?

Do you think that would work?

Then how come you have FErs thinking FAQ has flaws? that doesn't actually make it 'the starting point of FE'

Quote from: "EvilToothpaste"

It might help to say which FAQ they should read (probably not, though).  There is a "FAQ" button right there on the top menu bar that has little to do with any kind of earth.  

What do you think would help solve this problem?  Perhaps the appropriate FAQ should be labelled as "Flat Earth FAQ", with the additional admonition, "READ BEFORE POSTING"?

Do you think that would work?

Link the FAQ button at the top to the FAQ thread.

Then how come you have FErs thinking FAQ has flaws? that doesn't actually make it 'the starting point of FE'

Because, surprisingly, we don't all have the exact same opinions - just like any other group of people.  Who would have thought it, FEers behave just like other groups of people.  Bizarre but true.

Quote from: "daniel_is_not_flat"

Then how come you have FErs thinking FAQ has flaws? that doesn't actually make it 'the starting point of FE'

Because, surprisingly, we don't all have the exact same opinions - just like any other group of people.  Who would have thought it, FEers behave just like other groups of people.  Bizarre but true.

post please on flat earthers and conspiracy. i'd like to see 3 out of 3 different oppinions.

How come RErs all think the same about earth? how come your group of people has different oppinions about the same thing. doesn't it occur to you there might be a mistake?

How come RErs all think the same about earth? how come your group of people has different oppinions about the same thing. doesn't it occur to you there might be a mistake?

...Hahahahahahahah...


That's all...


~D-Draw


P.S. You are possibly the most ignorant person on Earth.

i'm ignorant for asking them to prove the conspiracy?