Ridiculous Thoughts of Globalists

  • 1 Replies
  • 3362 Views
*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 22984
  • The Most Forum Legend
Ridiculous Thoughts of Globalists
« on: October 08, 2019, 11:09:52 PM »
under this heading we will examine how globalists can act unnecessarily, unpurposefully, ridiculously and unscientific on different topics. this will allow them to think twice before they do something, and in the same case, instead of taking such comments seriously, it will enable us to laugh at them and thus look at life more positively.

I want to throw the first stone.

TOPIC, HERE: Debunking the sun

The shadow is on the left side not created by the door but by the adjacent building (shop?). One third of the doorway doesn't project it's shadow. That's because of mentioned building.

Notice the rectangle cut-out in the middle segment of fence is leaving a shadow. The shadow is being cast from far more than just light coming through the cut-out. There is a more complicated series of shadows coming together here.

How long did you spend scanning google street view looking for this?

All you have to do is look at the shadows of the vertical bars of the door. Your "A" shadow angle is not cast by the door frame.

So obvious, I'm surprised you didn't notice, wise!

The main mistake they make here, as we have seen, is that the door does not cause shade. and there are similar errors.

Let's see what I say about shadow that they have mentioned.

there are gaps in the door and light is leaking from this gap.

...

As we see that, the left shadow has 7 degree to paving stones and the other one has 28 degrees to paving stones.


I said light leaked in the gap in the door. I did not claim that the shadow belongs to the door. the problem is that the shade angles of the buildings at different distances are different from each other. The figure tells it. and all of the above globalists make the same mistake. What can I do here except to laught?  ;D


this workplace is on strike

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 22984
  • The Most Forum Legend
Re: Ridiculous Thoughts of Globalists
« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2019, 04:09:08 AM »
We are talking about dead of Baghdadi. There is a simple sentence everybody can get. Who claim they do something that others have to accept, burden of proof is in their side.

Americans claim they have killed him, hence burden of proof is in their side.

What is wrong here? Or, what a relevance with Qantas Airlines?  O0 But, according to globalists here, there is a relationship between burden of proof and Qantas airlines. No no, this is not a joke, this is what we deal every day here.

Americans claim they have killed him, hence burden of proof is in their side.
According to you they could have just put him on a Qantas flight to Australia and they would have chucked him in the ocean.  Then he would have disappeared like the rest of the passengers...

these people are definitely not ordinary people. They really need to have very specific features. He makes a correlation between Baghdadi's being missing and missing Qantas passengers. This may be a joke or a nightmare.  >:D

This is my answer.

Americans claim they have killed him, hence burden of proof is in their side.
According to you they could have just put him on a Qantas flight to Australia and they would have chucked him in the ocean.  Then he would have disappeared like the rest of the passengers...
I don't think this is what I'm talking about.

What can else be said?  C:-)
« Last Edit: November 04, 2019, 04:33:06 AM by wise »


this workplace is on strike