I've said this before, but what I find extremely curious is the willingness of FE to go along each other no matter how many different models they have. I'd think there'd be more infighting as many of them are in direct conflict, yet not much of that is seen. How can you be in agreement with someone when what they claim does not match what you
believe know to be true? You have flat Earths, dual Earth, flat with two poles, flat with ice wall, and I don't know how many others. The whole "scene" is a mess.
And yes: I lived in the US, I'd go see a Space X launch. I don't think a single flatter has been to one. Must be a scary thought to witness one. (Although, of course, it goes to the Pacific or the Atlantic. So maybe scratch that.) In addition the efforts of other nations are brushed aside or bunched together with the great snake that is NASA and, I guess, Masons, and reptilians. All of them are in cahoots; Soviets were, China is, India is faking it too, Japan no doubt, and then there are the European nations.
Their psychosis is what keeps them together, it is the single factor they share.
EDIT: The whole mess reminds me a tad of a time I was a part of a group trying to secure funding for a project. Our presentation was a goddamn mess. And as we could not present a solid vision, we got fuck all. Which I later thought was more than fair, as thinking back I would not have given myself any monies for such a shoddy show. Kinda like FE. All over the place, with people who no one thinks of as being reliable or worth listening to.
You get your act together, present a solid front, I am sure there could be more people who were at least interested. As it stands FE appears to be a thing most common with "people with certain personality traits and cognitive styles"*. It is a bit of a turn-off for many, even if it is an interesting take on things, in a way. And, best of all, in most cases, thankfully harmless.
*
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/09/180925075108.htm