Oh my! More quackery from the round earth box. Any experiment that proves the earth is not round must be a troll! I must be the village idiot, attempting to dupe round earthers into performing a failing experiment!
I find it very humorous that many here are claiming such an experiment is impossible, when one baller has already completed the task, albeit he seems to have not followed directions. He even goes so far to say it is extremely well thought out - thank you kindly Stash.
Very curious as to the results of your attempt at the experiment. I do however worry that there was a methodological issue with your implementation or the gathering and analysis of your results as I have performed this experiment many times and have always come to the conclusion that the earth must not be round. Did you make sure to repeat the experiment until you had a suitable dataset as instructed? Did you take note of the shadows which showed no change in angle?
I am still eagerly awaiting lone grangers attempt of this most wondrous experiment. Surely it will pull the wool from his eyes and restore his sight and reason to know for a fact that the earth is not some whirly gig and his shoes do not contain magnets that adhere him to its surface - and of course that I am indeed the most prolific scientist of 2019.
To the rest of you, I know buying the proper twine and tying it twice is quite the impossible task for the average round earther. More so, performing this action with gusto must be right out. I forgive you in advance if you are not up to the task. After all, we all knew when this thread started that the roundies would come and hand wave away any evidence while providing little to none of their own to justify this. Its the same thing they do in every thread. If I was trolling you roundies in this thread, you'd certainly have it coming.
I am more than willing to perform your so called experiment and have made simple requests for information to further that goal. As I anticipated, you've ignored those questions while simultaneously calling out another member for incorrectly performing the experiment, which is a given considering the scant amount of detail you provided.
The only conclusion anyone can reach regarding your position here is that you are a liar, plain and simple. This thread is proof of it; as I pointed out to you in our brief exchange over peer-reviewed content, the purpose of having your methods being clear and well stated are for exercises such as this. In the absence of clear direction and information on your part, we have no ability to faithfully reproduce your experiment. The only reason you would deliberately avoid providing that data is because you are aware that this exercise is faulty and cannot be reproduced with the results you claim.
You are a liar Mr. Davis. That much is clear in this whole affair. Should you provide the information requested, I will gladly retract my position and openly offer an apology. However, I expect you to be incapable of providing answers to those questions as we are both aware that you did not perform this experiment.