Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?

  • 98 Replies
  • 1818 Views
*

Pezevenk

  • 13564
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #90 on: October 30, 2019, 01:15:47 AM »
Wall of blue text

You forgot to answer.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Pezevenk

  • 13564
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #91 on: October 30, 2019, 01:17:09 AM »
When did I mention the 1974 negotiations?    You were the one who introduced Kissinger to the debate. 
And then you started talking about Kissinger, and the negotiations. It's not my fault you confuse yourself when you jump to whatever conversation suits you.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

Pezevenk

  • 13564
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #92 on: October 30, 2019, 01:17:56 AM »
LOL.  I was thinking of trying to engage you in a discussion,  but I'm getting the feeling you are already a lost cause.  Try getting out more.
When confronted with sources, JerkFace screams incoherently.

LOL,  projecting.
Still forgot to answer.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

JerkFace

  • 10099
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #93 on: October 30, 2019, 02:13:16 AM »
When did I mention the 1974 negotiations?    You were the one who introduced Kissinger to the debate. 
And then you started talking about Kissinger, and the negotiations. It's not my fault you confuse yourself when you jump to whatever conversation suits you.

Correct,  it's not your fault that you are ignorant of Syrian history.  But you could at least make an effort to learn a little bit.  Or, you could go on thinking you know it all.

Oh wait....

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

JerkFace

  • 10099
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #94 on: October 30, 2019, 04:14:41 PM »
Tulsi Gabbard is planning a spoiler campaign.  I'm wondering if that might backfire, and she takes votes from Trump,  rather than the Dems.

Quote
It is in Gabbard’s interest to conflate the charge that she is working on behalf of the Republicans with the charge that she’s working on behalf of the Russians. The former is apparent, while the latter is impossible to prove. Gabbard has taken some strident foreign-policy stances that follow no apparent American dovish objective, and do line up with Russian goals. While Gabbard presents herself as a noninterventionist, she bizarrely attacked the Obama administration for failing to bomb Al Qaeda in Syria, while crediting Russia for allegedly doing so:

Quote
In fact, nothing could do more to vindicate Clinton’s suspicion that Gabbard is being groomed by the Republican party as a spoiler candidate than a Wall Street Journal op-ed previewing her case for a spoiler campaign.

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/10/tulsi-gabbard-third-party-campaign-russia-spoiler.html
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • Administrator
  • 40032
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #95 on: October 31, 2019, 10:40:35 AM »
https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1189953841707573248?s=20
Quote
Ann Coulter
@AnnCoulter
No she didn't.  Tulsi is a SENATOR, meaning she's in the SENATE and doesn't vote on HOUSE resolutions.

This was a reply to this tweet -
 
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1189941618276782081?s=20
Quote
Catturd
@catturd2
For all you foolish Tulsi Gabbard fans ...

She just voted for the illegal impeachment coup.

She's just a better looking Nancy Pelosi.

Ann Coulter doesn't know that Tulsi is a rep.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

JerkFace

  • 10099
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #96 on: October 31, 2019, 05:18:13 PM »
https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1189953841707573248?s=20
Quote
Ann Coulter
@AnnCoulter
No she didn't.  Tulsi is a SENATOR, meaning she's in the SENATE and doesn't vote on HOUSE resolutions.

This was a reply to this tweet -
 
https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1189941618276782081?s=20
Quote
Catturd
@catturd2
For all you foolish Tulsi Gabbard fans ...

She just voted for the illegal impeachment coup.

She's just a better looking Nancy Pelosi.

Ann Coulter doesn't know that Tulsi is a rep.

I admit to not knowing much about Ann Coulter,  now I wish I didn't bother to find out.

Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.

*

Pezevenk

  • 13564
  • Militant aporfyrodrakonist
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #97 on: November 03, 2019, 04:52:19 PM »
Correct,  it's not your fault that you are ignorant of Syrian history.  But you could at least make an effort to learn a little bit.  Or, you could go on thinking you know it all.

Oh wait....
That's really rich coming from the person that has been mixing up things that happened years apart post after post after post.

Still avoided to answer substantially though.
It is not a scientific fact, it is a scientific fuck!
-Intikam

Who wants to be a firefly and who wants to be a blue whale?
-Sceptimatic

Please do not jizz to win an argument.
-Crutonius

Read a bit psicology and stick your imo to where it comes from.
-Inty (again)

*

JerkFace

  • 10099
  • Looking for Occam
Re: Tulsi Gabbard GOP Mole?
« Reply #98 on: November 11, 2019, 03:02:20 PM »
Interesting angle by Nate Silver,  If Gabbard runs as a 3rd party spoiler,  there is a strong chance she will split the conservative vote, rather than the Dems.

Quote
Lest you make the mistake that Tulsi Gabbard's support is coming from the left, almost all of her support in the Q-Pac poll of NH is from voters who describe themselves as conservative or moderate. And almost all from independents and not Democrats.

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1193986420039454721
Stop gilding the pickle, you demisexual aromantic homoflexible snowflake.