Sunrise and sunset have the same angular size, right?
Yes, the sun has the same angular size at sunrise and sunset, regardless of where you are one Earth, and the same angular size as the sun at any other point in the day.
And as shown, that is not what you would expect for the modern FE model.
Instead you would expect it to change in size significantly.
Why do you keep ignoring this?
Does the Moon move in a straight line in the Globe theory? It's doesn't over this Flat Plane. It circles above. And you leave out a very important element and I understand why.
What important element has been left out?
Certainly not the circling, as that makes no difference.
All that would mean is you would face in a slightly different direction.
This circling above would not magically make the distance remain roughly the same. The distance still varies dramatically as you move to different locations on Earth and observe at different times, failing to match reality.
This circling above would not magically make the object appear to go below or even touch the horizon.
In order to have the sun and moon set you need to have it circle in a plane not parallel to the surface of Earth, e.g. one perpendicular, so it literally goes below.
In order to have them remain roughly the same size, you need the distance to remain roughly the same, which like I have said, means you need to have the distance to them many times the size of Earth.
This would then mean they appear in the same direction to everyone.
Again, this makes reality fundamentally incompatible with a FE.
A RE can explain it.
The angular size remains basically the same, because the distance remains basically the same.
They set, because the rotation of Earth puts them below the horizon.
So why should RE accept defeat when it explains reality so well and FE is completely incapable of explaining it.