When will RE Community Accept Defeat?

  • 1981 Replies
  • 19923 Views
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38039
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1050 on: August 23, 2019, 04:28:09 PM »
Gravity pulling to center of mass would not allow a sphere earth to have rolling hills.
Why hasn't the constant upwards acceleration flattened rolling hills like it did for the rest of the flat earth?
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1051 on: August 23, 2019, 09:54:22 PM »
Gravity pulling to center of mass would not allow a sphere earth to have rolling hills. It goes against the force that creates spheres. And even more so with a centrifugal force is applied to a muddy surface, it has no choice but to curve and conform to a sphere.  The Globe Comunity can't have it both ways. One contradicts the other. It's no wonder why the defection continues.



I don't see a "muddy surface" there!

Again...

How do you know all these things?

What is your primary source for this information?

How about a water soaked (sub-soil) surface?  That's easily formed into a sphere with gravity pulling to center with a centrifugal force in effect.

Ok

~70% water logged surface

https://images.app.goo.gl/bQoqJAq49SujLV5a9

Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.


« Last Edit: August 23, 2019, 10:07:03 PM by Plat Terra »
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1052 on: August 23, 2019, 10:02:45 PM »
Gravity pulling to center of mass would not allow a sphere earth to have rolling hills.
Why hasn't the constant upwards acceleration flattened rolling hills like it did for the rest of the flat earth?

There is no constant upwards acceleration in my world or a eastward rotation. On a calm day, feathers in motion and blown soap bubbles don't drift west with a Globe Earth nor rush to the ground with a Plane Earth.
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1053 on: August 23, 2019, 10:37:47 PM »
Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.



Per usual, you are incorrect. Here's the original 'Blue Marble' image before it was cropped and flipped:



Image taken, Apollo 17, on December 7, 1972, at 05:39 a.m. EST (10:39 UTC)

Looking at timeanddate.com for that date and time, looks spot on:



Next unfounded issue you want smacked down?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1054 on: August 23, 2019, 10:39:00 PM »
Gravity pulling to center of mass would not allow a sphere earth to have rolling hills.
Why hasn't the constant upwards acceleration flattened rolling hills like it did for the rest of the flat earth?

There is no constant upwards acceleration in my world or a eastward rotation. On a calm day, feathers in motion and blown soap bubbles don't drift west with a Globe Earth nor rush to the ground with a Plane Earth.

What keeps your feet on the ground in your world?

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1055 on: August 23, 2019, 10:54:48 PM »
Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.



Per usual, you are incorrect. Here's the original 'Blue Marble' image before it was cropped and flipped:



Image taken, Apollo 17, on December 7, 1972, at 05:39 a.m. EST (10:39 UTC)

Looking at timeanddate.com for that date and time, looks spot on:



Next unfounded issue you want smacked down?

No. You are mopping up for NASA again. That is beyond a 23.5 degree tilt for an allotment of light for a fake Globe. Dress at anyway you wish. It's a fake picture. You can see the light allotment in the pic you posted.

See how much more land is viewed north.

« Last Edit: August 23, 2019, 11:01:21 PM by Plat Terra »
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1056 on: August 23, 2019, 11:20:51 PM »
The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe
Who cares about the suns allotment of light on your fake globe?
We are talking about the real one.

Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.
And here we have yet another baseless assertion from you.
How about you stop with the baseless assertions and start justifying your wild claims?

The picture looks fine.

Now, care to address why your allegedly flat Earth has hills when your magic downwards force should have made it all flat?
Or do you admit that line of reasoning by you is pure nonsense?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1057 on: August 23, 2019, 11:22:34 PM »
Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.



Per usual, you are incorrect. Here's the original 'Blue Marble' image before it was cropped and flipped:



Image taken, Apollo 17, on December 7, 1972, at 05:39 a.m. EST (10:39 UTC)

Looking at timeanddate.com for that date and time, looks spot on:



Next unfounded issue you want smacked down?

No. You are mopping up for NASA again. That is beyond a 23.5 degree tilt for an allotment of light for a fake Globe. Dress at anyway you wish. It's a fake picture. You can see the light allotment in the pic you posted.

See how much more land is viewed north.



Umm, have you ever heard of a 'camera angle'? You know, taking photos from different perspectives; high, low, left, right, below, above. That type of thing?

The image was not taken from and equatorial dead on angle like this:



It was taken from an angle like this:




*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1058 on: August 23, 2019, 11:32:25 PM »
So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle? Is this what you want us to  believe now? Or is this you being a mopper for NASA because the picture is fake?

Umm, you're making no sense. What trajectory plan was altered? What are you talking about?

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1059 on: August 23, 2019, 11:39:50 PM »
Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.



Per usual, you are incorrect. Here's the original 'Blue Marble' image before it was cropped and flipped:



Image taken, Apollo 17, on December 7, 1972, at 05:39 a.m. EST (10:39 UTC)

Looking at timeanddate.com for that date and time, looks spot on:



Next unfounded issue you want smacked down?

No. You are mopping up for NASA again. That is beyond a 23.5 degree tilt for an allotment of light for a fake Globe. Dress at anyway you wish. It's a fake picture. You can see the light allotment in the pic you posted.

See how much more land is viewed north.



Umm, have you ever heard of a 'camera angle'? You know, taking photos from different perspectives; high, low, left, right, below, above. That type of thing?

The image was not taken from and equatorial dead on angle like this:



It was taken from an angle like this:



You posted the fact the picture in question is from the Apollo mission.

So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle? Is this what you want us to  believe now? Or is this you being a mopper for NASA because the picture is fake?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with Earths alledged tilt. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt.

Your mopping is nailed!
« Last Edit: August 23, 2019, 11:42:32 PM by Plat Terra »
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1060 on: August 23, 2019, 11:48:48 PM »
Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.



Per usual, you are incorrect. Here's the original 'Blue Marble' image before it was cropped and flipped:



Image taken, Apollo 17, on December 7, 1972, at 05:39 a.m. EST (10:39 UTC)

Looking at timeanddate.com for that date and time, looks spot on:



Next unfounded issue you want smacked down?

No. You are mopping up for NASA again. That is beyond a 23.5 degree tilt for an allotment of light for a fake Globe. Dress at anyway you wish. It's a fake picture. You can see the light allotment in the pic you posted.

See how much more land is viewed north.



Umm, have you ever heard of a 'camera angle'? You know, taking photos from different perspectives; high, low, left, right, below, above. That type of thing?

The image was not taken from and equatorial dead on angle like this:



It was taken from an angle like this:



You posted the fact the picture in question is from the Apollo mission.

So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle?

No. And why would you even think that?

Is this what you want us to  believe now? Or is this you being a mopper for NASA because the picture is fake?

Why don't you show us what you think Apollo 17's trajectory was? What an odd and ridiculous argument, it literally makes no sense.

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt.

How would you know? You have no idea where your flat earth sun is right now let alone where it was in 1972. If you feel so confident in your claim, why don't you tell us where the sun is at noon right now on your flat plane and how you figured that out. You can't can you? Didn't think so.

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1061 on: August 23, 2019, 11:58:03 PM »


You posted the fact the picture in question is from the Apollo mission.

So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle?
[/quote]

No. And why would you even think that?

Is this what you want us to  believe now? Or is this you being a mopper for NASA because the picture is fake?

Why don't you show us what you think Apollo 17's trajectory was? What an odd and ridiculous argument, it literally makes no sense.

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt.

How would you know? You have no idea where your flat earth sun is right now let alone where it was in 1972. If you feel so confident in your claim, why don't you tell us where the sun is at noon right now on your flat plane and how you figured that out. You can't can you? Didn't think so.
[/quote]

The picture is fake!!

And No. You need to accept defeat in defending a fake NASA picture.  Your fake picture has much more tilt than is allowed and it is seen in the picture YOU POSTED.  YOUR HAVE BEEN NAILED AGAIN BY YOUR OWN POST.  See how much more land is viewed (second picture) north with the proper fake tilt?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with your fake Globe Earths alledged tilt. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt. Have a nice fake Globe  morning!



The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1062 on: August 23, 2019, 11:59:33 PM »


You posted the fact the picture in question is from the Apollo mission.

So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle?

No. And why would you even think that?

Is this what you want us to  believe now? Or is this you being a mopper for NASA because the picture is fake?

Why don't you show us what you think Apollo 17's trajectory was? What an odd and ridiculous argument, it literally makes no sense.

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt.

Quote
How would you know? You have no idea where your flat earth sun is right now let alone where it was in 1972. If you feel so confident in your claim, why don't you tell us where the sun is at noon right now on your flat plane and how you figured that out. You can't can you? Didn't think so.

The picture is fake!!
I know by the mechanics of your fake Globe.

And No. You need to accept defeat in defending a fake NASA picture.  Your fake picture has much more tilt than is allowed and it is seen in the picture YOU POSTED.  YOUR HAVE BEEN NAILED AGAIN BY YOUR OWN POST.  See how much more land is viewed (following picture) north with the proper fake tilt?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with your fake Globe Earths alledged tilt. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt. And I know this by the mechanics of your fake Globe. Your fake sun does not shine on your fake Globe as repesented in the FAKE PICTURE. Have a nice fake Globe morning!



« Last Edit: August 24, 2019, 12:04:46 AM by Plat Terra »
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1063 on: August 24, 2019, 12:07:21 AM »
The picture is fake!!

And No. You need to accept defeat in defending a fake NASA picture.  Your fake picture has much more tilt than is allowed and it is seen in the picture YOU POSTED.  YOUR HAVE BEEN NAILED AGAIN BY YOUR OWN POST.  See how much more land is viewed (second picture) north with the proper fake tilt?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with your fake Globe Earths alledged tilt. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt. Have a nice fake Globe  morning!




Again, how would you even begin to think you know anything about trajectories, angles, tilts, and sunlight when you don't even know where your sun goes at night? That said, your evidence thus far is a toddler stomping their feet screaming, "It's fake!"

Well done, as usual, no knowledge, no evidence about your own flat earth model, let alone any other. Keep up the good work. Though you're becoming somewhat of a bore, too easy to defeat.

Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1064 on: August 24, 2019, 01:03:22 AM »
Still didnt answer why there arent hills on a flat earth.
Hills are fake news to plata
« Last Edit: August 24, 2019, 08:01:11 AM by Themightykabool »

*

rabinoz

  • 22127
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1065 on: August 24, 2019, 01:06:41 AM »
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The picture is fake!!
You are the one asserting that "The picture is fake!!" so the onus is on You to prove that "the picture is fake!!".

Quote from: Plat Terra
And No. You need to accept defeat in defending a fake NASA picture.  Your fake picture has much more tilt than is allowed and it is seen in the picture YOU POSTED.  YOUR HAVE BEEN NAILED AGAIN BY YOUR OWN POST.  See how much more land is viewed (second picture) north with the proper fake tilt?
You own diagram below shows that at UTC time = 10:38 on December 7, 1972 the whole of Antarctica is in full sunlight!

Quote from: Plat Terra
BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with your fake Globe Earths alledged tilt. You still loose anyway because of the fake tilt. Have a nice fake Globe  morning!
Totally incorrect! Look at the day/night map from TimeandDate: Day and Night World Map!

Quote from: Plat Terra


You don't seem able to work out where the sun shines even with a day/night map in front of you!

So, we lose nothing!

Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1066 on: August 24, 2019, 02:43:21 AM »
So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle? Is this what you want us to  believe now?
And yet another baseless claim.
Why would that have required altering their trajectory plan?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with Earths alledged tilt.
And another baseless claim.
Again, where is any justification for these multiple baseless claims you are making?
It seems all you have baseless claims and outright lies.

If you want any sane person to take your claims seriously you will need far more than just repetition of the same lies.

*

Shifter

  • 10665
  • ASI
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1067 on: August 24, 2019, 03:59:18 AM »
So the Apollo Mission altered their trajectory plan to take a picture of Earth at a different angle? Is this what you want us to  believe now?
And yet another baseless claim.
Why would that have required altering their trajectory plan?

BTW, the Suns light would not have reached that far south with Earths alledged tilt.
And another baseless claim.
Again, where is any justification for these multiple baseless claims you are making?
It seems all you have baseless claims and outright lies.

If you want any sane person to take your claims seriously you will need far more than just repetition of the same lies.

Judging by Jack Blacks continued contribution to this thread I've reached 2 conclusions

Jack Black will not accept defeat

Jack Black is rabinoz. I mean seriously, who else would have the stamina to argue a losing argument like this.

The jig is up Jackinoz

?

frenat

  • 3390
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1068 on: August 24, 2019, 05:55:48 AM »
Gravity pulling to center of mass would not allow a sphere earth to have rolling hills. It goes against the force that creates spheres. And even more so with a centrifugal force is applied to a muddy surface, it has no choice but to curve and conform to a sphere.  The Globe Comunity can't have it both ways. One contradicts the other. It's no wonder why the defection continues.



I don't see a "muddy surface" there!

Again...

How do you know all these things?

What is your primary source for this information?

How about a water soaked (sub-soil) surface?  That's easily formed into a sphere with gravity pulling to center with a centrifugal force in effect.

Ok

~70% water logged surface

https://images.app.goo.gl/bQoqJAq49SujLV5a9

Your picture is fake. The Suns allotment of light on a fake Globe with a 23.5 degree tilt proves your pic is fake. Your picture has the Mediterranean Sea with a tilt to north far beyond 23.5 degrees.  You should take more time to choose fake pictures more wisely.


the picture is fine and shows exactly what one would expect to see for that time and angle with that lens. Yet another fail from Plat Terra
« Last Edit: August 24, 2019, 05:57:34 AM by frenat »

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1069 on: August 25, 2019, 05:33:18 PM »
Members of the Globe community often ask “How do you explain the Sun going down over the horizon” and we say, it appears to go down because of refraction and perspective, they say “Prove it”.

The following experiments shows a light going down in appearance, but yet the light stays the same height above the surface at any time.  And remember, as the Sun moves from the median to the horizon, the viewer has no choice but to view the Sun through more and more atmosphere as it reaches the horizon.  The atmosphere acts like a lens and its appearance gets larger as it moves farther away.

Flat Earth Sunset Experiment Anyone Can Do


The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1070 on: August 25, 2019, 05:44:12 PM »
Members of the Globe community often ask “How do you explain the Sun going down over the horizon” and we say, it appears to go down because of refraction and perspective, they say “Prove it”.

The following experiments shows a light going down in appearance, but yet the light stays the same height above the surface at any time.  And remember, as the Sun moves from the median to the horizon, the viewer has no choice but to view the Sun through more and more atmosphere as it reaches the horizon.  The atmosphere acts like a lens and its appearance gets larger as it moves farther away.

Flat Earth Sunset Experiment Anyone Can Do



Garbage experiment:

- What's the refractive index of the lens he is using?
- We don't live inside a glass of water
- Why does the candle get larger as it gets further away, we don't observe that in reality
- I thought flat earthers claimed that with enough magnification anything could be pulled back into view from over the horizon?
- Lastly, we're talking about a 3000 mile high sun. Demonstrate that 'setting' along with a refractive index measurement required and the distance needed away from the observer.

Garbage.

*

Shifter

  • 10665
  • ASI
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1071 on: August 25, 2019, 05:48:48 PM »
On my daily calendar at work there is a quote

"No matter how convincing and true sounding the story, always hear the other side"

Something I observe all the round earthers like jackinoz fail to do. Too busy shilling for or simply too stupid and blinded by their small and dim world view.

So the other week I was walking at night and I knew there would be a full moon (or close to being full coming out shortly). Although I could not see it, the sky was not black and the clouds were lit up. This in turn helped to light the field I was walking across. If this were a globe I was on, the sky should still be dark as the side of the Earth I am on is obscured from the moon. Yet hours before it came to view, there was its light already seen.

You can see the same with the sun. The sky starts to change colour before the sun is in view.

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1072 on: August 25, 2019, 06:01:49 PM »
On my daily calendar at work there is a quote

"No matter how convincing and true sounding the story, always hear the other side"

Something I observe all the round earthers like jackinoz fail to do. Too busy shilling for or simply too stupid and blinded by their small and dim world view.

So the other week I was walking at night and I knew there would be a full moon (or close to being full coming out shortly). Although I could not see it, the sky was not black and the clouds were lit up. This in turn helped to light the field I was walking across. If this were a globe I was on, the sky should still be dark as the side of the Earth I am on is obscured from the moon. Yet hours before it came to view, there was its light already seen.

You can see the same with the sun. The sky starts to change colour before the sun is in view.

Might have been twilight. Can be longer or shorter depending on your latitude and time of year same for the moon with the addition of where the sun is. Actually more evidence that they are large celestial bodies far away, the sun being really far away:


*

Shifter

  • 10665
  • ASI
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1073 on: August 25, 2019, 06:11:57 PM »
On my daily calendar at work there is a quote

"No matter how convincing and true sounding the story, always hear the other side"

Something I observe all the round earthers like jackinoz fail to do. Too busy shilling for or simply too stupid and blinded by their small and dim world view.

So the other week I was walking at night and I knew there would be a full moon (or close to being full coming out shortly). Although I could not see it, the sky was not black and the clouds were lit up. This in turn helped to light the field I was walking across. If this were a globe I was on, the sky should still be dark as the side of the Earth I am on is obscured from the moon. Yet hours before it came to view, there was its light already seen.

You can see the same with the sun. The sky starts to change colour before the sun is in view.

Might have been twilight. Can be longer or shorter depending on your latitude and time of year same for the moon with the addition of where the sun is. Actually more evidence that they are large celestial bodies far away, the sun being really far away:



It was well passed twighlight. The sun had gone hours before. When there is no moon (or 'new moon') I cant even see my feet on the ground. There is no street lighting and little in any way of light pollution (It's Canberra! Not like a major city in China or Korea which I have been to and barely able to see a single star or planet thanks to the eternal twilight from the city lights) The only difference is the moon. When its out, I see the effects of its lighting well before it 'rises'. The clouds are bright which in turn light up the ground enough for me to see where I'm walking.


*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1074 on: August 25, 2019, 06:12:38 PM »
Members of the Globe community often ask “How do you explain the Sun going down over the horizon” and we say, it appears to go down because of refraction and perspective, they say “Prove it”.

The following experiments shows a light going down in appearance, but yet the light stays the same height above the surface at any time.  And remember, as the Sun moves from the median to the horizon, the viewer has no choice but to view the Sun through more and more atmosphere as it reaches the horizon.  The atmosphere acts like a lens and its appearance gets larger as it moves farther away.

Flat Earth Sunset Experiment Anyone Can Do



Garbage experiment:

- What's the refractive index of the lens he is using?
- We don't live inside a glass of water
- Why does the candle get larger as it gets further away, we don't observe that in reality
- I thought flat earthers claimed that with enough magnification anything could be pulled back into view from over the horizon?
- Lastly, we're talking about a 3000 mile high sun. Demonstrate that 'setting' along with a refractive index measurement required and the distance needed away from the observer.

Garbage.


Of course the opposition will respond with ridicule, but now they know light can appear to go down as it moves away and yet stays the same height above the surface with just a simple science experiment.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60834.msg2197868#msg2197868
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

sokarul

  • 15975
  • Discount Chemist
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1075 on: August 25, 2019, 06:14:36 PM »
Members of the Globe community often ask “How do you explain the Sun going down over the horizon” and we say, it appears to go down because of refraction and perspective, they say “Prove it”.

The following experiments shows a light going down in appearance, but yet the light stays the same height above the surface at any time.  And remember, as the Sun moves from the median to the horizon, the viewer has no choice but to view the Sun through more and more atmosphere as it reaches the horizon.  The atmosphere acts like a lens and its appearance gets larger as it moves farther away.

Flat Earth Sunset Experiment Anyone Can Do



Garbage experiment:

- What's the refractive index of the lens he is using?
- We don't live inside a glass of water
- Why does the candle get larger as it gets further away, we don't observe that in reality
- I thought flat earthers claimed that with enough magnification anything could be pulled back into view from over the horizon?
- Lastly, we're talking about a 3000 mile high sun. Demonstrate that 'setting' along with a refractive index measurement required and the distance needed away from the observer.

Garbage.


Of course the opposition will respond with ridicule, but now they know light can appear to go down as it moves away and yet stays the same height above the surface with just a simple science experiment.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60834.msg2197868#msg2197868

Instead of cowering away, why not address the problems?
Sokarul

ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

*

Stash

  • 2503
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1076 on: August 25, 2019, 06:29:55 PM »
Members of the Globe community often ask “How do you explain the Sun going down over the horizon” and we say, it appears to go down because of refraction and perspective, they say “Prove it”.

The following experiments shows a light going down in appearance, but yet the light stays the same height above the surface at any time.  And remember, as the Sun moves from the median to the horizon, the viewer has no choice but to view the Sun through more and more atmosphere as it reaches the horizon.  The atmosphere acts like a lens and its appearance gets larger as it moves farther away.

Flat Earth Sunset Experiment Anyone Can Do



Garbage experiment:

- What's the refractive index of the lens he is using?
- We don't live inside a glass of water
- Why does the candle get larger as it gets further away, we don't observe that in reality
- I thought flat earthers claimed that with enough magnification anything could be pulled back into view from over the horizon?
- Lastly, we're talking about a 3000 mile high sun. Demonstrate that 'setting' along with a refractive index measurement required and the distance needed away from the observer.

Garbage.


Of course the opposition will respond with ridicule, but now they know light can appear to go down as it moves away and yet stays the same height above the surface with just a simple science experiment.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60834.msg2197868#msg2197868

What we know is that we can take a 4 inch lit candle, place an artificial lens in front of it, one that doesn't represent atmospheric reality at all. Slide the candle a few inches away, it magnifies, again, not reality, then disappears from view. That's all that has been demonstrated. That does not even remotely tackle the reality of:

- What's the refractive index of the lens he is using?
- We don't live inside a glass of water
- Why does the candle get larger as it gets further away, we don't observe that in reality
- I thought flat earthers claimed that with enough magnification anything could be pulled back into view from over the horizon?
- Lastly, we're talking about a 3000 mile high sun. Demonstrate that 'setting' along with a refractive index measurement required and the distance needed away from the observer.

*

Crutchwater

  • 1992
  • Stop Indoctrinating me!
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1077 on: August 25, 2019, 06:36:19 PM »
I would also like to ask, when the sun goes away "through more and more atmosphere" on a clear evening, how is it replaced by stars visible right down to the horizon?
I will always be Here To Laugh At You.

*

Plat Terra

  • 939
  • I am a Neutral Flat Earther
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1078 on: August 25, 2019, 06:42:38 PM »
I would also like to ask, when the sun goes away "through more and more atmosphere" on a clear evening, how is it replaced by stars visible right down to the horizon?

After the greater light goes away the stars can easily be seen.
The Globe community is incapable of verifying Earth has the curvature calculated through experiment or claimed by anyone. They can measure a band of helium but they can’t actually measure and verify the dictated curvature of any landmass or canal. Why not?

*

rabinoz

  • 22127
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: When will RE Community Accept Defeat?
« Reply #1079 on: August 25, 2019, 06:48:13 PM »
Of course the opposition will respond with ridicule,
Why would "" not "" because the simulation IS ridiculous!

Quote from: Plat Terra
but now they know light can appear to go down as it moves away and yet stays the same height above the surface with just a simple science experiment.
Sure when you move a lens around!
But how does this magic lens keep the sun almost exactly same apparent size from sunrise to sunset apart from some distortion due to refraction when very close to the horizon?

Quote from: Plat Terra
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=60834.msg2197868#msg2197868
Your flat earth seems to need more and more guesses and magic the deeper you go.

I prefer to keep it the everyday things we see simple thanks.