Most things are a hypothesis and some things are misin/disinformation.
Well at least you are now admitting that you are intentionally spreading misinformation.
It's all about deciphering what can be potentially legit and what can actually be legit.
Not an easy task for those trying to get past mainstream ideals.
Yes, it is quite hard for those trying to reject reality to find things which are legit.
Look at how hard it is for you, still not being able to answer a very simple question, all because you need to reject the conclusion of that question.
Simple common sense should tell anyone that rockets need an atmosphere in order to work.
Except as clearly shown by your repeated avoidance of a simple question, IT DOESN'T!
Instead, simple common sense shows that it isn't needed at all.
Gas, like I said.
Again, that doesn't address the issue.
You can't just say a single word like that. You need to explain how the gas can push off something when you claim there is nothing there to push off, which in facts means there is something there to push off, which means there is something there for the rocket to push off.
If the gas leaving the rocket is capable of using the gas inside the rocket as leverage, then why can't the rocket?
If you bothered to pay attention you wouldn't need to type so much and have it ignored.
You mean I would realise you have absolutely no interest in the truth and I would just stop posting because I know you will honestly address the issue as it shows you are completely wrong and you have absolutely no rational nor honest way out?
If so, no, I am quite aware of that.
Perhaps you should try paying attention to what the actual issue is and then address that?
Perhaps I should try another question?
Is there anything in space for things to push off to move, or will they be unable to move as there is nothing to push off?
Again you have the same impossible situation for your insane claims, if the former, that means rockets work. If the later, that means the gas can't leave the rocket.
Force equals mass times acceleration means nothing unless you put it up against external atmosphere
So you are saying the gas can't accelerate out of the rocket as there is no external atmosphere to push off?
So the lack of an atmosphere magically keeps high pressure gas trapped inside an open container exposed to the vacuum?
Again, if simple common sense indicated that rockets can't work in a vacuum you should easily be able to address this issue, but you can't. Instead you just repeatedly contradict yourself by claiming the rocket can't accelerate in a vacuum because there is nothing to push off and there is no atmosphere, but the gas magically finds a way and pushes of something and manages to accelerate even though there is no atmosphere.
Again, you can't have it both ways.
Either rockets work in space, or gas stays trapped in an open container. Which is it?