All fresh and healthy after vacation.
Time to put some other nails in the Apollo coffin.
I'm afraid that all your nails are too rusty to make a dint!
Not that it is needed in 2019 where some 50% of the population in many countries refuse to believe the official NASA fairytale.
Opinion polls might be useful to find opinions about political matters but they are useless at deciding factual matters like the shape of the earth or whether the Apollo missions really went to the moon.
I cannot repeat myself enough about how splendid the ‘American moon’ docu from Massimo Mazzucco is.
You can worship at the feet of Massimo Mazzucco and drool over "how splendid the ‘American moon’ docu is" if you like.
But I'd rather believe someone who was not totally ignorant about the physics of things like the Van Allen Belts and the thermosphere.
At 59:50 in
American Moon he still repeats the many times debunked
Van Allen Beltbelt claims!
At 1:06:10 he goes on about "no specific protection against radiation".
But all
American Moon's claims about Apollo and the Van Allen belts is pure garbage!
Put briefly the type of radiation in the VAB's (particulate radiation including
β-particles) is best shielded by light materials such as polythene and aluminium.
It should definitely NOT be lead because that converts it into the far more dangerous
γ-rays!
Your "wonderful" American Moon lost all its credibility on that point alone!Read this post:
Space travel cannot be faked « Reply #60 on: June 11, 2019, 09:23:53 PM » especially the letter from
Professor James A. Van Allen.
But it goes on and on about the Van Allen belts and then says that
If it were true, like the debunkers maintain, that "a lunar mission entails a total radiation dose equivalent to an X-ray", why does NASA today describe the Van Allen Belts as "an area of dangerous radiation"?
Because they are "
an area of dangerous radiation" but the Apollo missions:
- Took trajectories to avoid the worst regions,
- spent quite a short time in the Van Allen Belts and
- used the appropriate shielding for the type of radiation in the Van Allen Belts!
Massimo Mazzucco's introduction and even just the above on the VABs is enough to prove to any reasonable person that
American Moon is simply an attempt to make money by ridiculing the Apollo missions.
And after a lot more rubbish at 1:25:09 he goes on about
no visible flame from that Ascent Module engine and claims that there should be because the Space Shuttle's manoeuvering thruster do show a visible flame.
BUT he ignores the fact that the AM engine "used
Aerozine 50 fuel, and N
2O
4 oxidizer" and
the Space Shuttle "burned monomethylhydrazine (MMH) as fuel, which was oxidized with dinitrogen tetroxide (N
2O
4)".
"
Aerozine 50 is a 50:50 mix by weight of hydrazine and unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH)", a different fuel which burns with a colourless flame even in air as can be seen in Titan II ICBM launches.
Your wonderful Massimo Mazzucco really should do far better research. But of course, if he did that, he simply would not have a case!That's about as much of that trash as I can stomach in one sitting. Maybe more later!
Simply watch American moon.... and take back what NASA stole from you. ... your own senses that tell you the photographs are taken on earth.
More rubbish from our pet NASAphobe but even if you could prove that they never reached the moon what have you gained?
Nothing!
Because there is unlimited evidence for the reality of space missions and even crewed missions without the landing on the moon.
And any one of those missions proves that your flat earth dreams are pure pipe-dreams.
Have fun!