There is a link in the FAQ to the book. But you knew that, as you read the FAQ before your first post.
Yes, 7 months ago. I had brain surgery, my memory isn't what it used to be.
So I looked over it.
Problem 1: He doesn't approach things scientifically. The "Zetetic Method" is crap. Picking and choosing theories which arose from the Scientific Method that you agree with is just as ridiculous as picking and choosing passages from The Bible to take literally or figuratively simply because it suits your own preconceived notions.
Science has an open mind, science changes, science accepts new facts, especially if it flies in the face of long-held beliefs. Rowbothom was a close-minded crackpot who eschewed any reasoning that didn't give him the answer he wanted from when he formed his "hypothesis".
If a scientist believed Earth was round and set out to find what caused lunar eclipses, and at one point came upon the possibility that the sun was casting Earth's shadow on the moon, he wouldn't dismiss it outright and call it absurd, he'd consider it... He may later dismiss it if he's not a very good scientist, but dismissing it immediately is not something a scientist would do because it's not something an intelligent person would do. That's the sign of an idiot. Same as the idiots who come here refusing to accept FEism, before they read any of your ridiculous, outlandish, preposterous, obnoxious, imbecilic, and flat-out crazy rants, thoughts, hypotheses and half-baked notions.
Problem 2: It doesn't explain how one part of the Earth sees an eclipsed moon while another part sees an ordinary moon at all, let alone give a plausible explanation for any other facet of the phenomenon.