UA

  • 93 Replies
  • 13889 Views
*

EvolvedMantisShrimp

  • 928
  • Physical Comedian
Re: UA
« Reply #90 on: July 11, 2019, 08:03:31 AM »
Buoyancy just can't significantly contribute to that massive variation.

Again, stop to talk about anything isn't exist. No need to buoyancy at all. If the specific mass of one object is higher than the other, it moves down, and if it slighter than other then moves up. no additional force is required. Buoyancy fraud is the result of the desperation of popular science. You are repeating same fraud proves you have cornered and need to fraudments one more time.

Why do you have a problem with buoyancy? It's not incompatible with a flat earth with either gravity or UA is it?

Its having or not having a problem with any model isn't my problem. The problem its being absent. No need to it. I am against all forms of fraud. Throw out of your globularist mind, Come out of your cave and deny the buoyancy fraudment.

Is it honest to select only flight that can fit into your map and pretend that others are "fake"?

I have denied the flights which are fraud. some flight times are in contradict. in this case, you compare them to see which is correct. I compared. The route was contradicted by thousands of different routes, and the evidence was examined before it was completely erased. and it appears that these flights are fake and absent. and those fraudsters were asked to prove these flights. received response: "we do not have to prove anything". Then I don't have to accept your lie. This is completely honest.

Surely you must have had some other parameters for selecting which flights to exclude besides the data not fitting your expectations. That would be shockingly unscientific.
Nullius in Verba

*

JackBlack

  • 20587
Re: UA
« Reply #91 on: July 11, 2019, 02:40:08 PM »
I have denied the flights which are fraud.
The only justification you have for dismissing them as frauds is that they show your map is wrong.
There is nothing wrong with their flight times.

The problem its being absent. No need to it
It has been repeatedly shown to be real and you have no rational objection against it.
So that clearly isn't the problem.
Buoyancy is very real and you ignoring it doesn't magically make it go away.
But if you want, go ahead and ignore it and tell Tom that his argument is garbage because buoyancy isn't real so it wont have any effect on the measured gravity of Earth.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 25329
  • The Only Yang Scholar in The Ying Universe
Re: UA
« Reply #92 on: July 11, 2019, 02:58:43 PM »
The only justification you have for dismissing them as frauds is that they show your map is wrong.
Nope. You're lying again, again and again. prove this. I've explained all the null so called flights when I did it. And all was logical and none of them was about its doing anything wrong. If I would thought they were true, I would correct the map based on this information.

You've been here for years, and you're objectively objecting to everything. Have you ever cause one believer give up  to this belief, or have you made them think about anything as you think it? No. on the contrary, those who believe in global theories and come here, see the globalists who object to everything like you and begin to give us the right. Your objections are completely null in our mind. because you are too ignorant to be compared to the people you really argue with. and this ignorance increases the faith of the people here.

Either give up or go away.
They hate me cause they can't control me.

"The greatest sacrifice is not what you do for others, but what you give up to do for yourself."


*

boydster

  • Assistant to the Regional Manager
  • Planar Moderator
  • 17754
Re: UA
« Reply #93 on: July 11, 2019, 03:48:51 PM »
All are welcome to debate flight times and Wise's map in the appropriate threads. This one is about UA.