Nobody discusses this anymore because everyone knows it's a nonsense
No, everyone knows that on the scale of a sink it is so insignificant that the direction you pour and the shape of the sink will have a much larger effect.
Sane people still accept that it explains things like large scale weather systems.
However if you really want to, you can see it on the small length scale by looking over large time scales. This is by using a Foucault pendulum.
With this the small perturbations add up so you can eventually see a change.
To the OP, another killer with startrails is of the south pole as well, with it always being 180 degrees away from the north pole. For a FE where you can circle at least one pole, that is impossible as it requires 2 straight lines to intersect after some finite distance.
Nope. It never happens. I've made many experiments in my bathtub to verify coriolus affect then found its independent from me staying Northern hemicake. Whenever I poured the water from clockwise direction it turns clockwise. When I poured the water from opposite of clockwise it turns opposite of clockwise. Everybody can repeat this simple experiment and debunk the so called coriolis affest. It has been debunked.
Youre repating same debunked so argument does not make it stronger, just makes you ridiculus.
Foucault pendulum is a demonstration, not a scientific experiment. We can debunk their claims of being scientific experiments whenever I needed to be. Because it is fake. If it was trus so it would prove nothing related the globe earth, because globe earth is a hoax. We have to see the claims in experiments.
Your so called its proving the things imaginated in your dreams does not make them magically as like in your dreams.
Last time I checked, a bathtub is a quite small system prone to many disturbances.
As such, it doesn't address what I said at all.
How about you actually focus on what I said?
How about you try finding a large scale weather system that violates the Coriolis effect?
How about you find a Foucault pendulum that violates the Coriolis effect?
You carrying out pathetic experiments which are no where near accurate enough to show the Coriolis effect is not grounds to dismiss it.
Showing other factors can have an effect doesn't mean the Coriolis effect isn't real.
Intentionally adding in other factors to obscure the result is the exact opposite of a scientific test as you have no adequate controls.
Trying to eliminate any external factors so the only variable is what you are testing is needed for a scientific test, at least if you are hoping to disprove something; otherwise all you are showing is that these external factors beat the effect you were trying to disprove, not that this effect doesn't exist.
If you want to show the Coriolis effect isn't real, you don't pour the water to influence it.
Instead you need to pour in the water and then wait a very long time for the surface of the water to become "still".
You also want to use a very large, circular container, with a very smooth surface and a drain dead-centre.
Then you need to open the drain without the disturbing the water (so further down the pipe).
You also want this shielded from the wind.
So yes, everyone can repeat a very simple experiment to determine if the Coriolis effect is real.
But most don't want to bother with the time, effort and resources required to do so.
If you would like to carry it out, go find a nice large circular pool/drum. Preferably 10s of m in diameter.
Find a place inside to put this.
Then have a drain right in the middle, which then goes out (below the pool) to somewhere off to the side with a valve to open/close the drain.
Then with the drain closed fill up the pool.
Then wait several days.
Now confirm the surface of the water is still.
A simple way is putting a few leaves on the surface or a few drops of food colouring along a line. Note, this line is important later. It allows you to see how it is changing.
Then open the valve along the drain pipe.
Now watch what happens as it drains.
See if the line remains, or if it starts turning into a spiral due to the Coriolis effect.
Remember, this effect will be small, so it will take quite a while. The closer to the pole the more significant the effect will be.
Or like I said, rather than bothering with this ridiculous setup of draining water, use a Foucault's pendulum.
And no, you dismissing it as fake to dismiss it as fake doesn't mean it is fake.
Nor does you dismissing it as fake, because it shows you are wrong and you dismissing you being wrong as fake, make it fake.
If you wish to have a rational person think of it as fake you will need to provide a justification for why it is fake.
You are yet to provide a single problem with it. Instead you just complain that it shows you are wrong.
Do you know what that means? It means you are wrong.
If your model doesn't match the evidence, the evidence isn't fake, your model is wrong.
P.S. computer programs are very good at optical character recognition. Especially when it is in a very common font.