I will take your lack of pointing out where I lied as an admission that I didn't and that you had been lying about me.
I denied the claim at the op by counter arguments.
Your "counter-argument" amounted to nothing more than you not understanding glare.
Your "counter-argument" was already refuted before you posted it.
You know it is not a sound argument.
More importantly, it didn't deal with what the OP said at all.
So it wasn't even a counter-argument.
It was a completely separate argument with nothing to do with the topic at all.
All you have done to the OP's argument is denied it.
You have not debunked the argument, nor refuted it.
In order to debunk or refute the argument you need to explain how on a FE where the sun remains roughly 5000 km above the surface of Earth that it appears to set, with the sun appearing to go below Earth, such that part of the sun is obscured by Earth, where you could easily extend the circle of the sun and show it would need to be inside or below Earth.
Until you do so, all you have is irrational denial.