You are saying lie againd and again.
WHERE?
We are both saying you denied his argument.
You have denied his argument.
That isn't a lie.
What you haven't done is refute or debunk his argument.
That requires far more than simple denial.
You are yet to show a single thing wrong with the argument. Instead all you have done is denied them and because of that stated the title is wrong.
Denying arguments is an attack to arguments, isn't it?
No, it isn't.
Just like denying reality isn't an attack to reality, nor does it make reality BS.
It is simply saying no to them, i.e. saying you don't accept them or agree with them.
It does nothing at all to address the validity or soundness of them.
Now stop to say anymore lies and accept both title and its arguments are nothing but BS.
Again, I'm not the one lying here.
I have no intention of lying and saying the argument is BS when you are yet to present any rational challenge to it.
If you want me to "accept" that the argument is BS you will need to demonstrate that it is.
Now care to actually address the argument?
HOW DOES THE SUN SET FOR A FE?
Again, it can't be perspective as that wouldn't allow the sun to set until it got infinitely far away and cannot produce the picture in the OP was the sun would need to be partially inside Earth.
Perspective is just things shrinking, not it magically appearing in a different direction.
Refraction in the atmosphere makes things appear higher, not lower, so again, that cannot be the cause.