If you have no data then you have no argument. There is little here to discuss.
So you are unable to discuss?
There is plenty of data which you just reject because it shows your model doesn't work.
You aren't even willing to answer simple questions.
If your model requires such ignorance to avoid being refuted it isn't a good model.
Again:
Do you accept that in the northern hemisphere, during their summer, the further north you go the more hours of daylight you have during a period of 24 hours, until eventually, above the Arctic circle you get 24 hours of daylight, i.e. the sun doesn't set.
Do you accept that in the southern hemisphere, during their summer, the further south you go the more hours of daylight you have during a period of 24 hours?