Maximum seeing distance

  • 97 Replies
  • 19965 Views
?

Souleon

  • 101
  • Truth interested
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #90 on: May 14, 2019, 05:04:39 AM »
hm... seems my quite large effort, to build up a friendly discussion with wise, was in vain.
I wonder how this would have turned out without rabinoz' and jackblack's rants. :(
Facts that can be explained logically by FET and not by RE: None.

*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #91 on: May 14, 2019, 05:10:15 AM »
Nope. Possible. Open a MMO game, you can move every sides, but it is still on 2D screen.
Souleon, you've still not replied this statement but supported jackblack's freedom of ask me question. Tell me something which prevents I put you in alt accounts of sickinoz group.
I've already explained that it is pure nonsense.
Again, you are not Souleon. Stop to identity theft. There is nothing to you and nobody has wanted to reply his statement. If you want to reply him, so directly reply him without mentioning me. Again, Stop to identity theft and behaving like a parasite on pages.
And I am not Souleon, nor am I JackBlack but I am also asking why you haven't answered the very simple questions asked.

Quote
Meanwhile, you still haven't answered this question:
If we can only see 20 km through the atmosphere, why does the sun appear to set rather than fade to a blur high in the sky?

Why do you refuse to answer?
Is it because you know you can't honestly answer without admitting your claim is nonsense?

So, I repeat with the others, Why do you refuse to answer? Is it because you know you can't honestly answer without admitting your claim is nonsense?

It seems that you "believe the earth is flat" but have no idea why you believe the earth is flat!

On the other hand we "believe the earth is a rotating Globe" and know exactly why we believe that the earth is "a rotating Globe".

So how about explaining just "why you believe the earth is flat"? Then how you explain the many simple observations that seem to indicate that the earth is not flat.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26122
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #92 on: May 14, 2019, 05:25:51 AM »
<rubbish deleted>
First you have to prove you have deserve to get an answer. If you are absent in my mind so why do I  give you an answer for any of your questions?
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Jura2
Bulma

I’m I a globalist AI.

*

Stash

  • Ethical Stash
  • 13398
  • I am car!
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #93 on: May 14, 2019, 09:52:06 AM »
hm... seems my quite large effort, to build up a friendly discussion with wise, was in vain.
I wonder how this would have turned out without rabinoz' and jackblack's rants. :(

All 'wise' roads lead to the same destination: He makes a wild unsubstantiated zero evidence claim(s) and when asked to provide evidence or substantiation nicely or not so nicely you get nothing other than ending up on his 'ignore' list. Which is actually the best place to be.

*

JackBlack

  • 23004
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #94 on: May 14, 2019, 02:35:09 PM »
Again, you are not Souleon.
Again, I DON'T CARE!
This is an open forum for debate. If you make a statement anyone can respond.
Don't expect to have a private conversation in such a place. If you want to have a private conversation with someone, take it to PMs or to some other site.

All your claims regarding MMOs and simulations is just a distraction from the topic.

Now again, if we can only see 20 km like you falsely claim, then the sun would not appear to set. Instead it vanish high in the sky, fading to a blur as it is obstructed by the atmosphere. Why is this not observed? Why do we instead get sunsets where the sun clearly appears to go below Earth?

hm... seems my quite large effort, to build up a friendly discussion with wise, was in vain.
I wonder how this would have turned out without rabinoz' and jackblack's rants. :(
It may have taken slightly longer to reach this point, but you would have gotten here.
All your comment does is serve to insult people and lose respect people had for you.

Unless you are willing to just accept whatever wise says, he has no interest in friendly discussion.

?

Souleon

  • 101
  • Truth interested
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #95 on: May 14, 2019, 03:37:41 PM »
All your comment does is serve to insult people and lose respect people had for you.
Do you mean that you felt insulted and that I lost your respect? If so, why? Or did I miss understand? You can also pm me
Facts that can be explained logically by FET and not by RE: None.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26122
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
1+2+3+...+∞= 1



Ignored:
Jura2
Bulma

I’m I a globalist AI.

?

Souleon

  • 101
  • Truth interested
Re: Maximum seeing distance
« Reply #97 on: May 15, 2019, 05:28:36 AM »
All your comment does is serve to insult people and lose respect people had for you.
Do you mean that you felt insulted and that I lost your respect? If so, why? Or did I miss understand? You can also pm me

JackBlack, I did read through your posts again and I realized that I did you wrong, sorry.

I should have used wording like "you put wise under so much stress / pressure by repeating questioning vehemently causing him to rant" instead of "ranting".  I'm not saying that you are not allowed to do so, but since I knew asking wise to stop ranting from his side, is a waste of time, I asked you to give him less fuel instead. But you didn't or couldn't or whatever. But doesn't matter now anyways.

I will let things settle and reduce the time that I spent in this forum drastically.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2019, 05:40:09 AM by Souleon »
Facts that can be explained logically by FET and not by RE: None.