Objects Weighing Slightly More at the Poles

I understood perfectly. I wanted you to confirm once again that the moon does not affect any objects on earth ... Then a contradiction comes out - how then does the moon attract tons of water and do not affect weights? And how the earth attracts air. When the air actually weighs nothing? This is bullshit. Gravity is mythical power.

I understood perfectly. I wanted you to confirm once again that the moon does not affect any objects on earth ... Then a contradiction comes out - how then does the moon attract tons of water and do not affect weights? And how the earth attracts air. When the air actually weighs nothing? This is bullshit. Gravity is mythical power.

The funny thing is, gravity and RET can explain this, FET not. 
I will work on the new thread now, addressing your question.

The funny thing is, gravity and RET can explain this, FET not. 
I will work on the new thread now, addressing your question.

Just the opposite. For a flat land, everything is explained perfectly, but for a ball it is a problem. Just not such a flat land - as it is considered here.

**My signature shows what the earth looks like, and I have already given the structure of the fields. In the theory that I speak, above the flat earth even lunar eclipses are possible and it is explained why the celestial bodies do not affect the weight of the weights.

Quote

The funny thing is, gravity and RET can explain this, FET not. 
I will work on the new thread now, addressing your question.

Just the opposite. For a flat land, everything is explained perfectly, but for a ball it is a problem. Just not such a flat land - as it is considered here.

**My signature shows what the earth looks like, and I have already given the structure of the fields. In the theory that I speak, above the flat earth even lunar eclipses are possible and it is explained why the celestial bodies do not affect the weight of the weights.

Ok, there is already a lot about tides in this forum, I will have a look first. But I would also be interested in your version for explaining tides. In the mean while you can watch
there is a little surprise at 3:50 you will like

edit: reading the tide threads was a waste of time 

My signature shows what the earth looks like

Is
Is no one going to talk about this?

Your signature is a magic horse.


And with the fun of reverse image searches, I've got it in gif form!

Is
Is no one going to talk about this?

Your signature is a magic horse.

Wow ... Now you really have to see where my drawing differs from the original.
You are the first who really paid attention to this. Nobody cared about my drawings.

Look at the board for the pony itself! And not on the pony itself.

  And you must understand what I am talking about.

Quote

Is
Is no one going to talk about this?

Your signature is a magic horse.

Wow ... Now you really have to see where my drawing differs from the original.
You are the first who really paid attention to this. Nobody cared about my drawings.

Look at the board for the pony itself! And not on the pony itself.

  And you must understand what I am talking about.

It's still not particularly helpful, in no small part due to the magic horse in the way. You removed the red design (probably clouds) at the top, changed a couple of numbers, removed North and South, moved the Sun, turned the Earth into a square rather than a circle, and added three hearts.

It tells us that the Earth is a square, the Sun and moon are above it (the meaning of the angle not being clear as their elevation changes with season), and apparently that rain and clouds are actually just giant hearts. The only detail of your model taht I can gauge from that would be that maybe the Sun and moon mirror one another's locations if they're both at seventy degrees, though what that means is questionable.

You are inquisitive Jane. And you probably already understood that my translator is not one of the best, because sometimes it comes out complete nonsense. Everything would be fine if someone else tried to understand what I was writing. But alas, you are the first one who really got interested in where the sun and the moon are above us.
I will say frankly - I am disappointed with this society, because everyone is arguing and no one really understands that the flat land in the form that they want to see it does not exist. All the flat land theories presented here are not even approximately plausible!
None of the models can explain lunar eclipses! They simply can not be explained for the usual - flat land! And the radar of the moon completely refutes the triangulation by which the moon is very close above us. I am a radio amateur myself and I understand what a signal passage in 2 seconds means.
In view of this, satellites are not even needed to understand that the earth cannot be flat. But ... not so simple. I have no doubt that the earth is not a ball - since the earth really has 4 corners. If we use the knowledge of past civilizations and understand what the latest discoveries of science mean, then we can build a completely working theory for the flat earth, in which even there is an explanation for the lunar eclipses and the signal passage to the moon.
There is such a term - the figure of the merkaba. So, the ancients understood how everything works - our world is a connection of two Merkaba figures, in one of which we are in another heaven with the sun, the moon and the stars. Such a construction of the world is harmoniously fully confirmed by all the laws of physics. Practical studies were conducted on the possibility of the existence of such a construction of fields. These fields can exist, hence the aetheric wind, and force magnetic fields and everything that we see around. Far space - there time flows differently with a difference of about 400 times slower. From here and a different aberration. The moon - the sun is in this second funnel - the second figure - as in the picture I have.

Quote from: Heavenly Breeze on May 13, 2019, 08:13:54 PM

Quote

Is
Is no one going to talk about this?

Your signature is a magic horse.

Wow ... Now you really have to see where my drawing differs from the original.
You are the first who really paid attention to this. Nobody cared about my drawings.

Look at the board for the pony itself! And not on the pony itself.

  And you must understand what I am talking about.

It's still not particularly helpful, in no small part due to the magic horse in the way. You removed the red design (probably clouds) at the top, changed a couple of numbers, removed North and South, moved the Sun, turned the Earth into a square rather than a circle, and added three hearts.

It tells us that the Earth is a square, the Sun and moon are above it (the meaning of the angle not being clear as their elevation changes with season), and apparently that rain and clouds are actually just giant hearts. The only detail of your model taht I can gauge from that would be that maybe the Sun and moon mirror one another's locations if they're both at seventy degrees, though what that means is questionable.

Looks like our good friends at reddit have tried to decipher it from whatever movie it came from:



https://www.reddit.com/r/mylittlepony/comments/6l4576/lets_examine_the_whiteboard_from_the_movie_trailer/

So you removed the aurora, made the earth flat and now it's a nice hidden message: flat earth -> leads to -> nothing