RE-winning threads

  • 203 Replies
  • 55633 Views
?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • +0/-0
  • I argue for stress relief!
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #90 on: February 28, 2007, 01:11:13 PM »
ok, I'll go check for that, thanks for the info.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #91 on: March 03, 2007, 01:17:43 AM »
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #93 on: March 05, 2007, 01:35:16 PM »
And another:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11048.0


That thread is the same idea as this one - maybe the OP's can collaborate a bit?

?

astronomy101

  • 297
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #94 on: March 05, 2007, 02:06:41 PM »
If you refer to the FAQ, RE has lost every thread. Any threead that was not answered by Tom Bishop is because the thread deserved no answers. Asteroids and Comets thread still has no reasonable answer though...
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #95 on: March 05, 2007, 02:48:18 PM »
Very true

?

astronomy101

  • 297
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #96 on: March 06, 2007, 11:41:12 AM »
Earth: Not a Globe single handedly discredited all RE arguements.
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.

?

Jasra18088

  • 45
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #97 on: June 21, 2007, 11:14:08 AM »
this was a long time ago :D

?

Gulliver

  • 3804
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #98 on: June 21, 2007, 12:19:12 PM »
this was a long time ago :D
Good bump. Thank you. I'll start reviewing it this weekend for inclusion into the RE Primer.

?

Skeptical ATM

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #99 on: June 21, 2007, 12:21:16 PM »
Hadn't seen this, Hate to break it, but that last link doesn't disprove FE. Should be ignored.

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #100 on: October 19, 2007, 02:50:00 PM »
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #101 on: October 19, 2007, 02:52:56 PM »
Since when, was your ban lifted?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #102 on: October 19, 2007, 08:27:35 PM »
REers, post here links to threads that FEers have been unable to answer coherently. I DO NOT MEAN THAT ARE STILL IN DEBATE, i mean threads that prove fatal flaws in the FE theory, I.E.,

the flight distances thread
FE sun does not set
FE horizon does not match real world
The threads in this one post
How does the sun work, and why does the current explination fit RE so well?
I'm sure there was an earleir thread of this but I cant find it; sun visible after sunset

This thread phails because they created it in the purpose of it getting mentioned. Sorry dude, DISQUALIFIED
please, take any discussion of these topics to the topics, this thread is for archival purposes.

Six of those are mysteriously not there.
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?

?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #103 on: October 20, 2007, 02:22:38 PM »
Wierd, non?
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.

?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #104 on: October 21, 2007, 03:35:54 PM »
Are they deleting threads that disprove that Fake "theory" or something? Hiding the evidence?
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #105 on: October 21, 2007, 03:40:35 PM »
They probably deleted the threads because they don't want to show the newcomers their flaws in those threads.

?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #106 on: October 21, 2007, 03:43:23 PM »
They probably deleted the threads because they don't want to show the newcomers their flaws in those threads.
The actual arguments made against the "theory" should be gathered as well, then...
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6903
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #107 on: October 21, 2007, 06:54:58 PM »
The actual arguments made against the "theory" should be gathered as well, then...

Posted by Gulliver:

"Thanks to divito for a "fairness" review and proofread of the first part of the RE Primer.

We've added the Mars retrograde experiment in time for November's retrograde motion.
We've added the comical follies of the TheEngineer.
We've added the middle school lesson plan.
There are other additions too.

Version 2.6 embeds the Excel worksheet into Appendix I, so don't look for it separately anymore.

Thanks to the contributors."


http://theroundearthsociety.org/RE%20Primer.docx
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #108 on: October 22, 2007, 05:12:39 AM »
Since when, was your ban lifted?


It timed out I think. I'll behave this time I promise.  :)


More FE pwnage: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17615.0
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #109 on: October 22, 2007, 08:12:04 AM »
It timed out I think. I'll behave this time I promise.  :)
Your sig says otherwise.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #110 on: October 22, 2007, 11:16:50 AM »
It timed out I think. I'll behave this time I promise.  :)
Your sig says otherwise.

My sig? What about it?
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #111 on: October 22, 2007, 04:51:39 PM »
Why was this thread bumped up?  For more stupid crap?

?

Tom Dipshit

  • 484
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth Opponent
Tom Bishop: "The earth cuts the universe in half."

Narcberry (smarticus): "Oceans are free from gravity."

Z' Lord of Purple: "yes, superfast jet streams for the win!!!"

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #113 on: October 23, 2007, 05:33:02 AM »
And that confirms my thought.

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #114 on: October 23, 2007, 11:07:14 AM »
And that confirms my thought.

Shut up.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #115 on: October 23, 2007, 01:47:59 PM »
I'm just contributing crap to the crap thread.

?

dantheman40k

  • 541
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #116 on: October 25, 2007, 08:32:54 AM »
I'm just contributing crap to the crap thread.


I said shut up. If you dont have anything constructive to say then shut up.

Fucking FlatEarther.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17697.0
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 18043
  • +11/-9
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #117 on: October 25, 2007, 08:40:00 AM »
Cause "shut up" is constructive
"Once again the apostles of science are found to lack the scientific credentials for their faith. This not an indictment of science; it only shows again that the choice of science over other forms of life is not a scientific choice."

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14993
  • +0/-0
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #118 on: October 25, 2007, 08:41:56 AM »
I'm just contributing crap to the crap thread.


I said shut up. If you dont have anything constructive to say then shut up.

Fucking FlatEarther.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17697.0

You have no power or authority.  You suck.  And no.

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 18043
  • +11/-9
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #119 on: October 25, 2007, 08:56:39 AM »
I'm just contributing crap to the crap thread.


I said shut up. If you dont have anything constructive to say then shut up.

Fucking FlatEarther.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=17697.0

You have no power or authority.  You suck.  And no.
Oh, snap!
"Once again the apostles of science are found to lack the scientific credentials for their faith. This not an indictment of science; it only shows again that the choice of science over other forms of life is not a scientific choice."