RE-winning threads

  • 203 Replies
  • 44304 Views
?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • Rick <3 Gayer
RE-winning threads
« Reply #60 on: February 12, 2007, 09:33:21 PM »
RESOCR will review all the thread posted, and only include them if it's genuine.

RESOCR: please PM me the posts you would like removed from this thread (ie. the non genuine submissions) - we don't want it cluttered.

?

il0vepez

RE-winning threads
« Reply #61 on: February 12, 2007, 11:19:14 PM »
I have another problem here that can't be solved with a flat earth: the CMB data.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9068&start=30

RE-winning threads
« Reply #62 on: February 13, 2007, 07:28:41 AM »
Quote from: "Tom Bishop"
Quote from: "phaseshifter"
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=117117#117117


Yes, because as we all know, saying "Case closed" at the end of a thread wins the argument.


Did I say that was the reason?

You go right ahead and refute it then. You made an illogical statment and then disapeared.
atttttttup was right when he said joseph bloom is right, The Engineer is a douchebag.

RE-winning threads
« Reply #63 on: February 14, 2007, 06:29:24 AM »
...population who believe in globularism solely on the basis of having been told so?

RE-winning threads
« Reply #64 on: February 14, 2007, 11:38:58 AM »
Please don't spam Danthe.
atttttttup was right when he said joseph bloom is right, The Engineer is a douchebag.

*

beast

  • 2997
RE-winning threads
« Reply #65 on: February 14, 2007, 04:48:08 PM »
I think many people misunderstand what this topic is about.  This is presumably because REers are just too stupid to understand anything.

Any argument that relies on experiments that cannot be easily carried out by anybody is not a "RE winning thread."  A RE winning thread is something that I can go outside right now and confirm myself, or can confirm with very little effort and no reliance on anybody else's evidence.

RE-winning threads
« Reply #66 on: February 14, 2007, 04:50:32 PM »

RE-winning threads
« Reply #67 on: February 14, 2007, 05:00:50 PM »
Quote from: "manta_ray007"
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9431

Is this thread a winner yet?


Damn right i won that thread...manta was just boxin his man out makin sure he would get the rebound if i had missed

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
RE-winning threads
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2007, 01:12:52 PM »
Quote from: "beast"
I think many people misunderstand what this topic is about.  This is presumably because REers are just too stupid to understand anything.

Any argument that relies on experiments that cannot be easily carried out by anybody is not a "RE winning thread."  A RE winning thread is something that I can go outside right now and confirm myself, or can confirm with very little effort and no reliance on anybody else's evidence.


An RE-winning thread is a thread that gives facts, supported by observational data, that is not explained by the FE theory. THESE DO NOT have to be backed by expirements. No explination, it goes here.

Yes, i'll go review them all now.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
RE-winning threads
« Reply #69 on: February 15, 2007, 01:37:12 PM »
Quote from: "manta_ray007"
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9431

Is this thread a winner yet?


this is the same exact question I brought up my first day here, which as I think of it, was never answered anyway but by a vague 'Gravitational Lensing' (Which, FEers dont believe in gravity anyway. WTF?) So if you really want to make a decent addition to this thread, go dig up mine. I'm not accepting threads I know to be doubles.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
RE-winning threads
« Reply #70 on: February 16, 2007, 06:46:29 AM »
bumped so the noobs have something to do besides flame people

The curvature pic thread may make it in here, simply because THERE ARE SO MANY IMAGES! I'll keep putting lines on all of them untill the see, if you will, the point.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

*

beast

  • 2997
RE-winning threads
« Reply #71 on: February 16, 2007, 07:47:52 AM »
This topic has degraded into rubbish.  Just because you decide that a topic is "Winning" it doesn't mean that it actually is.  There are a couple of ways the Earth can be proved round.  Sadly most people lack the intellect to actually work out what those are.  I know of 3 ways, and they were all proposed by people who "are" FEers.  People who argue that the Earth is round will never get it.

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
RE-winning threads
« Reply #72 on: February 16, 2007, 11:57:59 AM »
Quote from: "beast"
This topic has degraded into rubbish.  Just because you decide that a topic is "Winning" it doesn't mean that it actually is.  There are a couple of ways the Earth can be proved round.  Sadly most people lack the intellect to actually work out what those are.  I know of 3 ways, and they were all proposed by people who "are" FEers.  People who argue that the Earth is round will never get it.


Posts like this is part of the reason why this thread has degraded into rubbish  :wink:

And I use criteria I believe everyone could decide on;

No debate logical to anyone's perspective has been put up in the last three days.

Now, you can feel free to make an FE wining threads if you want, I wont stop you, in fact, i'd much like it.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #73 on: February 24, 2007, 12:24:08 PM »
Still no FEer responces.Losers cant even back up their own theory.
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #74 on: February 24, 2007, 12:31:06 PM »
I'm pretty sure you're missing the point of this thread, Dan.

~D-Draw

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #75 on: February 24, 2007, 04:38:28 PM »

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #76 on: February 24, 2007, 07:25:57 PM »

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #77 on: February 24, 2007, 07:27:31 PM »

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #78 on: February 25, 2007, 02:22:46 AM »
and this one

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=10869.0


You're kidding yourself buddy

Get the fuck out this thread if you have nothing constructive to add.


Anyway, Rick James's retardedness aside, I have a thread to add to the FE Pwnage Archive.


http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=10571.0
FE Pwnage Archive

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=8101.0


The Engineer is still a douchebag







.

*

Pyrochimp

  • 577
  • Senator Awesome
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #79 on: February 25, 2007, 08:00:57 AM »
No...he's right, that topic doesn't really prove anything.  It makes it incredibly apparent, but there's always the "fish-eye conspiracy lens that's put on all cameras that only distorts horizons" excuse.
Some people are ****ing stupid! ~ George Carlin

Mathematical proof of the flat Earth:
[{(Diameter of Earth)*(tan[distance from Earth to sun/distance from North pole to equator])}2]/0

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #80 on: February 25, 2007, 08:15:33 AM »

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #81 on: February 25, 2007, 06:28:11 PM »


?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #83 on: February 27, 2007, 03:09:25 PM »
but it was a post of photographical phail.
They don't accept images of space or other such objects, or of the earth from space, so neither will I
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

*

sokarul

  • 18938
  • Extra Racist
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #84 on: February 27, 2007, 03:11:47 PM »
This would of been a sweet thread had the posts in the op not been deleted. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #85 on: February 27, 2007, 03:17:01 PM »
yeah, I'm still keeping the links up just because it has the reason with it, and I'll still add more as they are entered if they meet criteria.

This means that you guys get to remake said threads! I doubt some of you can bring it to it's original glory, but w/e, if it meets it, it's in.
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #86 on: February 27, 2007, 05:18:50 PM »

?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • I argue for stress relief!
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #87 on: February 27, 2007, 07:03:09 PM »
no. The reasons they provide are sound, though I personally disagree.

If FE makes logical arguments, it ain't a win for RE. After all, we didn't win it if we lost it, you get what I'm saying?
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #88 on: February 27, 2007, 08:26:15 PM »
no. The reasons they provide are sound, though I personally disagree.

If FE makes logical arguments, it ain't a win for RE. After all, we didn't win it if we lost it, you get what I'm saying?

So as long as they have some form of answer it's a win?(baring things like 'because' or 'god' obviously)

Man tough crowd...

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: RE-winning threads
« Reply #89 on: February 27, 2007, 11:11:59 PM »
yeah, I'm still keeping the links up just because it has the reason with it, and I'll still add more as they are entered if they meet criteria.

This means that you guys get to remake said threads! I doubt some of you can bring it to it's original glory, but w/e, if it meets it, it's in.


THe threads still exist, just do a search for them and update your links - the addresses changed when the forum software did.