Werepenguins vs NASA XIV: Flatty McFlatface

And know that the person he is working with, assuming not junker, is also confirmed.

I mean, not lynching is an option, but I don't think it's the best call since we didn't lynch on day one either. Eventually, we have to spill some blood to find the enemy.

Should we leave it tied so that no one dies? I don't know.

First of all, there's no way CFC could know that Junker is confirmed villager and also know that DD is a penguin.

I didn't mean confirmed I just meant doing something a villager would do and vote for a penguin.

Or did you just out him as the psychic?

Should we leave it tied so that no one dies? I don't know.

First of all, there's no way CFC could know that Junker is confirmed villager and also know that DD is a penguin.

I think CFC is basing his conclusion on Junker being a confirmed Villager solely on the fact that he said only a non-Villager would want him dead...for whatever reason(s) that may be.

Or did you just out him as the psychic?

No, I haven't talked to junker this game. I am just happy he voted.

I am one of the 4 options I posted. I am not NASA nor a penguin. I hate the channeler is in this game, otherwise there would be zero doubt on duck.

I am still quite positive on duck from the way he has acted and from a statistic point of view it is much more likely he is a penguin over being a channeler and him just happening to to have the fake role of a penguin scam artist

I think CFC is basing his conclusion on Junker being a confirmed Villager solely on the fact that he said only a non-Villager would want him dead...for whatever reason(s) that may be.

Yes, as a villager even NASA would want someone that came back as a penguin dead. I will not use the word confirmed, as I have no idea what junker is. Will replace it with "what a villager would do".

These are conversations that we would have in the "ghost council", just making "most" of it in public and seeing what happens.

Backfired thus far

im a werewolf tbh

im a werewolf tbh

Honestly, if I had to guess your role I would guess that for some reason.

Well, I'm not convinced CFC is necessarily on one of the evil teams, but HEY LOOK we got a whole lot of dialog going! It's a 3-3 vote, and if either party that's currently on the potential chopping block actually meets their maker via lynching today, we'll know a lot more.

Well, I'm not convinced CFC is necessarily on one of the evil teams, but HEY LOOK we got a whole lot of dialog going! It's a 3-3 vote, and if either party that's currently on the potential chopping block actually meets their maker via lynching today, we'll know a lot more.

Kinda the other reason I rustled up some conversation here with being unorthodox. Yes, I wanted to test being more open, but also wanted to push some more conversation and ruffle some feathers.

Though shame on you for voting for me just because I didn't get right back to your PM! Do you complain to a manager about your food being slow when the server is still walking away from taking the order?

You know if it stays tied I will be killed by the scam artist penguin through lynching... They know I know too much.

It's lonely out here

Quote from: boydster on April 17, 2019, 04:47:54 PM

Well, I'm not convinced CFC is necessarily on one of the evil teams, but HEY LOOK we got a whole lot of dialog going! It's a 3-3 vote, and if either party that's currently on the potential chopping block actually meets their maker via lynching today, we'll know a lot more.

Kinda the other reason I rustled up some conversation here with being unorthodox. Yes, I wanted to test being more open, but also wanted to push some more conversation and ruffle some feathers.

Though shame on you for voting for me just because I didn't get right back to your PM! Do you complain to a manager about your food being slow when the server is still walking away from taking the order?

I was going to vote for you even before you didn't get back to my PM in a timely fashion. That was just an added reason for feeling comfortable with my vote. Someone has to get lynched, hopefully today before too much more time goes by with us just sitting on our thumbs.

I was going to vote for you even before you didn't get back to my PM in a timely fashion. That was just an added reason for feeling comfortable with my vote. Someone has to get lynched, hopefully today before too much more time goes by with us just sitting on our thumbs.

Why would you kill someone useful though? That doesn't make any sense...

I'm not sure you are really a good guy. And to come out of the gates like you did with that accusation and the choice of words that you used was mighty weird. I explained exactly why I voted the way I did, and I stand by it, but I'm not so arrogant as to think my guess could be wrong. It's a guess. And at the time, it was only one vote, so it wasn't really consequential, it was to get things moving.

I'm not sure you are really a good guy. And to come out of the gates like you did with that accusation and the choice of words that you used was mighty weird. I explained exactly why I voted the way I did, and I stand by it, but I'm not so arrogant as to think my guess could be wrong. It's a guess. And at the time, it was only one vote, so it wasn't really consequential, it was to get things moving.

If you were going to guess why not guess for someone coming back as a penguin?

Yes, there is the off chance he really could be the channeler, but that is a hell of a lot better than just a "guess" don't you think?

Listen, I get what you are saying. Look at it from my vantage point though. You came out straight up aggressive, claiming special knowledge from mysterious and possibly dubious sources. I was actually fairly convinced you were NASA and Duck was a Werepenguin. Or you were a wildcard being wild. Or you were a psychic/empath being incredibly reckless. Of the choices I saw before me, the majority involved you being a bad guy, and lynching you would almost certainly reveal whether Duck was a good next target. And it still will, if that's how the cookie crumbles.

Listen, I get what you are saying. Look at it from my vantage point though. You came out straight up aggressive, claiming special knowledge from mysterious and possibly dubious sources. I was actually fairly convinced you were NASA and Duck was a Werepenguin. Or you were a wildcard being wild. Or you were a psychic/empath being incredibly reckless. Of the choices I saw before me, the majority involved you being a bad guy, and lynching you would almost certainly reveal whether Duck was a good next target. And it still will, if that's how the cookie crumbles.

At this point, if figured I would try a more aggressive approach, at least in the beginning.

No difference than starting a behind the scenes council, you at least get to see everyone's reactions and get some good/bad conversations going.

I am still disappointed

you at least get to see everyone's reactions and get some good/bad conversations going.

I'll toast to that!

You also run the risk of getting lynched because we have no way of knowing if someone actually is a penguin based on your word in a game where people lie.

The sky plank Crouton built is complete, ready to dispense sky justice at the will of the voters. Fourteen hours to go.

Rate of ascent decreasing. We are in uncertain territory. JANE interactivity will be diminished as this altitude and the coming heights are scanned. Some processing power was spared to help with the clue hunt though. A read-out displays the question, not as a hint to an answer but rather an analysis of the existing hints:

What do the following have in common?
Fish. Sheep. Third(noun). Glasses.

Hmmm, there's the whole singular & plural thing. But 'third' is throwing me off a bit. 3 things & one 1/3 of something?

I really don't know who to vote for, they are both being suspicious but now it's a tie so there's no bandwagon to jump on. Still got time to decide though.

What do the following have in common?
Fish. Sheep. Third(noun). Glasses.

They all enjoy a nice glass of wine after dinner and so they started a wine club.

What do the following have in common?
Fish. Sheep. Third(noun). Glasses.

Mmm, they are all nicknames that Junker had at school?
(No I'm not still salty at your suspicions, at all)

Hmmm, there's the whole singular & plural thing. But 'third' is throwing me off a bit. 3 things & one 1/3 of something?

Singular Plural thing is not correct.   Thirds is plural of Third.  It isn't plural by itself.  For example one third is singular.  Two thirds is plural.

What gets me is why was (noun) included.  The word third is a noun, so why include it.

I know, I was grasping at straws trying to figure out how to make 'third' fit in to my craptastic theory. And the noun bit doesn't do anything but confuse.

Now I'm just digging holes and filling them back up again...

Quote from: Pezevenk on October 02, 2018, 12:31:45 PM

Bring it on, penguins!

We are unlucky because of there is no penguins in neither Aegean nor Mediterranean sea. We need to import from Australia. What does its taste look like to beef, sheep or fish?

Reminder that the hint is not standalone, and instead acts to help explain one of the existing clue. You may have more luck attempting to see if it helps one of them.

Four hours to go. As of yet the votes are tied.

As much as I hate bloodshed I can't allow a good plank to go unused another night. Additionally I wish to further my research regarding whether the ghost of someone who has been pushed off an airplane can return to that airplane to annoy the living. I therefore nominate CFC to be my research partner in this endeavor.

[vote to lynch CFC]

A shadowy figure is spotted near the vote box. Some see it, but it hurries away too quickly.
There is a scam artist aboard. A myriad eyes now watch the box to ensure the same figure does not get to approach again. That scam artist has lost their power.