Rab seriously WTF?? Inflation from the early universe depends on a violation of conservation of energy. Casimir Effect does as well.
The "cosmic inflation" period may have violated "conservation of energy" but the "laws of physics", as we know them, didn't exist then.
In any case "conservation of energy" only applies locally where spacetime can be regarded as essentially flat and even there it should be "conservation of mass-energy".
On a cosmic scale that has no meaning and it is the Energy-Momentum Tensor that is conserved.
Does the "Casimir Effect" violate conservation of energy? And even if it does there is no suggestion that it can extract more than a minute amount and magnitude does matter.
As does the current expanding of the universe. YOU asserted that they don't. Are you refusing to defend that?
No, the "current expanding universe" does not violate "conservation of energy" any more than the fragments of an explosion in space flying apart violate it.
What those fragments do will depend on there initial velocities and the gravitational forces between them.
In the same way the universe might contract, stay the same or expand depending on certain assumptions.
How the Big Crunch Theory Works, Gravity vs. Expansion.The "accelerating expansion of the universe" might violate "conservation of energy" and that is a matter currently being debated by cosmologists.
Some suggest that more space is created containing "vacuum energy" so generating energy etc etc - way way above my pay grade!
Either the OP's premise is wrong, or it isn't. I asserted that the premise is wrong, and you took the opposing position. Are you standing by that?
My beef all along has been with your first post:
I'm excited. I think he's about to disprove cosmic inflation and UA at the same time!
Whether you meant "cosmic inflation" or "expansion of the universe" is not really relevant.
Neither "cosmic inflation" (now irrelevant) nor the "expansion of the universe" provide any support for UA.
The Wiki suggests that the driving force for UA is
Dark Energy, which accelerates all celestial bodies, including the Earth, in the universe. Modern astrophysics accounts that the expansion of the universe is due to Dark Energy.
But "dark energy" is not a part of the "expansion of the universe" so that reasoning is invalid.
"Dark Energy" is one hypothesis for the
acceleration of the "expansion of the universe" but even its energy density is far too low to be a feasible source of the driving force.
But you and the flat earth "theorists" can claim anything that you like but don't try to rely on the hypotheses of modern cosmology relevant only thousands of light years away for justification.
Now let this be an end to this silly business.