But the world can't be flat...

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

I can.

then do so. once I have seen some decent proves, I will be more than happy to accept this theory.

It's quater to 11 - I have 5 hours of ICT course work to do and only 2 cans of red bull left.  how about no

I can wait untill the weekend.  

I can't - I going on my hols

well, you have a nice long time to think about how you are going to prove what no-one on this forum has yet managed to prove then, havent you. I look forward to your return.

Step 1. Read the FAQ

Step 2. Read the book "Earth not a Globe" by Samuel Birley Rowbotham

Step 3. Read the book "One hundred proofs the Earth is not a Globe" by William Carpenter

Step 4. Read the back-issues of Flat Earth News Quarterly

Step 5. Read the book "Flatland" by Edwin A. Abbott

Step 6. Look outside your window

Flatland is a fictional book.

Step 3. Read the book "One hundred proofs the Earth is not a Globe" by William Carpenter

There is only one copy of this on Amazon, none in the Colorado library system, and it's $135 on Amazon.  I'm way too poor.  Can you scan it?

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

That liquid nitrogen as it is pouring...  :roll:

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Seconded!

In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

Actually, the presumption of onus of proof on the Prosecution in a legal case is dependent on a variety of circumstances and can often shift to the defendant for particular aspects of a case.

Step 1. Read the FAQ

Step 2. Read the book "Earth not a Globe" by Samuel Birley Rowbotham

Step 3. Read the book "One hundred proofs the Earth is not a Globe" by William Carpenter

Step 4. Read the back-issues of Flat Earth News Quarterly

Step 5. Read the book "Flatland" by Edwin A. Abbott

Step 6. Look outside your window

1. It's nonesense

2. Writer had too much crack

3. Same here

4. Nobody gives a fcuk

5. Sounds like a fantasy novel

6. You're an idiot

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Seconded!

i decided to quote this one instead of the other, but while there is liquid nitrogen being poured out, can't you see the big chunk of solid nitrogen?

Quote from: "St_Jimmy"

In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

Actually, the presumption of onus of proof on the Prosecution in a legal case is dependent on a variety of circumstances and can often shift to the defendant for particular aspects of a case.

Depends were you are being trialed as the US has different rules to the UK or where ever.

"One hundred proofs the Earth is not a Globe" by William Carpenter

this guy must be a jackass cause his book is false. If it were real people would have been enlightened be his great intelect. It seems he's just another brick in the wall. His book is a joke with pathetic reasons for the earth to be flat. Everything this guy says can be laughed apon. Seriously, if this guy gave real answers people would begin to question the shape of the earth. How do you think bestellers are created? by brilliant minds. Apparantly this guys an idiot who cant write for shit.

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Seconded!

i decided to quote this one instead of the other, but while there is liquid nitrogen being poured out, can't you see the big chunk of solid nitrogen?

I don't like the pyramid game.

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Seconded!

i decided to quote this one instead of the other, but while there is liquid nitrogen being poured out, can't you see the big chunk of solid nitrogen?

I don't like the pyramid game.

Then why are you playing it? lol

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "midgard"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "Hara Taiki"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "me"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

Quote from: "joshd"

Quote from: "st_jimmy"

PR00F OR STFU

well, prove they are completely transparent then, or, as you say, STFU.

in science you must disprove it.

yea, true, but it works both ways dude. disprove what I originally said. you really dont do yourself any favours by being rude.

 In the court of law it is up to the prosecution to find the defendant guilty

but on these forums, who are the prosecutors, and who is guilty? the two theorys both argue opposite things, and neither side can PROVE anything. so statements like "PR00F OR STFU" really dont get you anywhere.

can you prove your arguements? no. can I prove mine? no. can I disprove your arguments? no. can you disprove mine? no.

I have started to find that this forum is an enjoyable place to discuss this sort of stuff, not just a place to come and flame, like I originally joined up to do.

Look at it this way, you are made of atoms and molecules.. if you really are transparent, it might be a good idea to put to good use, cos the rest of us (well me anyway) are slightly on the opaque side

only because your molecule build up is not approx 78% nitrogen - thank god

lol, quote pyramid

So nitrogen atoms/molecules are transparent but others aren't?

exactly!

ok nitrogen is colourless..http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ec/Solid_nitrogen.jpg/300px-Solid_nitrogen.jpg can't see through all of it tho

PS: this quote pyramid=beautiful

Indeed it is!

I just HAD to make it one bigger.

Seconded!

i decided to quote this one instead of the other, but while there is liquid nitrogen being poured out, can't you see the big chunk of solid nitrogen?

I don't like the pyramid game.

Then why are you playing it? lol

Maybe I just don't understand how to do quotes correctly.

Then again maybe I don't have a reason for doing what I do.