Mountains on the Moon

  • 15 Replies
  • 1551 Views
Mountains on the Moon
« on: March 25, 2019, 05:10:03 AM »
I have heard many flat earth folks claim that you cannot see mountains more than a couple of hundred miles away because air is not truly transparent.  If this were the only reason, then why can I clearly see mountains on the surface of the moon if it's 3000 miles away as you claim?   

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 18370
  • Backstage
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2019, 05:44:37 AM »
air is not truly transparent in ground level. After 20kms high there is almost no air and the remained air is clear. 20kms far, 200kms far or 3000 miles far has same clearness if you look through upside.
boydster the angry globalist being a mod is my red line. During he continues to be mod, others will be ignored till infinity.






Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2019, 08:44:48 AM »
I have heard many flat earth folks claim that you cannot see mountains more than a couple of hundred miles away because air is not truly transparent.  If this were the only reason, then why can I clearly see mountains on the surface of the moon if it's 3000 miles away as you claim?

Yes, they do claim that you can't see more than a few hundred miles through the air, but only if that sight path is down low, like looking at a mountain or the setting sun, because the air is more dense and has more water dissolved in it down low, because it's warmer.

So if the mountain was 500 miles straight above you, only a small portion of that sight path is through the dense air, the rest is through very thin air.


« Last Edit: March 25, 2019, 10:54:48 AM by Tom Foolery »

*

boydster

  • Brute Squad Support
  • Planar Moderator
  • 12810
  • You keep using that word.
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2019, 10:44:04 AM »
Tom Foolery, this is FE Q&A. If you want to provide FE A's to FE Q's, all is good. Your last paragraph belongs in FE Debate. ;)
Let me explain this in a way you can understand. What you just wrote sounds exactly like something that a gay rights Portuguese Samurai would write.

Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2019, 10:55:15 AM »
Tom Foolery, this is FE Q&A. If you want to provide FE A's to FE Q's, all is good. Your last paragraph belongs in FE Debate. ;)
Thanks & Fixed!

Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #5 on: August 14, 2019, 08:43:10 AM »
air is not truly transparent in ground level. After 20kms high there is almost no air and the remained air is clear. 20kms far, 200kms far or 3000 miles far has same clearness if you look through upside.

The moon rises and sets. What's happening when it's at horizon level, and I can still see mountains and craters on it?

To make it more specific, I live in Northern England on the coast. I have watched the moon rise over the sea. How can I see the mountains and craters on the moon, but not also see the much closer mountains in Norway, on the other side of the North Sea?

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 15449
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #6 on: August 15, 2019, 11:49:44 AM »
Have you really never driven away from a mountain?
Quantum Ab Hoc

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17252
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #7 on: August 15, 2019, 02:59:59 PM »
The fact that the Moon is often crisp and clear while mountains only 10 miles away are foggy and discolored is a piece of evidence that the visible Moon is a projection upon the atmolayer.

*

John Davis

  • Secretary Of The Society
  • Administrator
  • 15449
  • Most Prolific Scientist, 2019
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #8 on: August 15, 2019, 03:37:34 PM »
Why the shift towards a projection? And also not a dome?
« Last Edit: August 15, 2019, 03:55:16 PM by John Davis »
Quantum Ab Hoc

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17252
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2019, 07:05:47 PM »
The celestial bodies are described as projections upon the atmolayer in Earth Not a Globe. Distant lights will often magnify and maintain their sizes, as in the case of these distant street lamps:

https://vimeo.com/342791916

The lamps in the far field appear to be the same size into the distance as they recede.

It is sometimes asserted that the above effects are caused by glare. This assertion invokes an apparent absurdity, however: to explain the observation of consistent sizes an enlarging glare would need to seemingly intellegintly adjust itself in size, in accordance to the shrinking with perspective and distance to the observer, in order to make the bodies the same size into the distance.

If glare at position A is making bodies x2 its size, for example, a body 8x smaller at 8 times distance from position A would be required to have a glare of 16x to match the glare at position A, which is eight fold increase of the initial ratio. It is questionable how 'glare' could know where the observer is, in order to cause bodies to maintain their exact sizes into the distance.
« Last Edit: August 15, 2019, 07:09:14 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38186
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #10 on: August 16, 2019, 07:00:13 AM »
The fact that the Moon is often crisp and clear while mountains only 10 miles away are foggy and discolored is a piece of evidence that the visible Moon is a projection upon the atmolayer.
On what part of the atmolayer would a "crisp and clear" projection be possible? ???

Also, how do you project onto the atmolayer in the first place? ???
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2019, 08:28:35 AM »
Im confused as to what stance tomB has.

In the Plata thread he is pushing glare and refraction and it is sun related.

Here, is a projection issue and moon related.

Why there two systems if both bodies are up in the sky?

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • 2066
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2019, 08:34:00 AM »
The celestial bodies are described as projections upon the atmolayer, blah blah

Who is projecting, from where, powered by what and why would they?


Eagles may soar high, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17252
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2019, 07:32:17 PM »
The projection of the Sun onto the atmoplane is official explantation in Earth Not a Globe and both Wikis on both FES websites. You can read about it here: https://wiki.tfes.org/Magnification_of_the_Sun_at_Sunset

Take a magnifying glass to text on a piece of paper. The lens rebroadcasts the photons to a slightly different position. It's as if an image is projected upon the surface of the magnifying glass -- An example of a projection onto a transparent medium.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2019, 08:16:16 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 38186
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2019, 12:17:00 PM »
The projection of the Sun onto the atmoplane is official explantation in Earth Not a Globe and both Wikis on both FES websites. You can read about it here: https://wiki.tfes.org/Magnification_of_the_Sun_at_Sunset

Take a magnifying glass to text on a piece of paper. The lens rebroadcasts the photons to a slightly different position. It's as if an image is projected upon the surface of the magnifying glass -- An example of a projection onto a transparent medium.
I think that the word you're looking for is "refracts", not "rebroadcasts".  And no, the image isn't being projected upon the surface of the magnifying glass any more than an image of the paper is being projected onto the eyeglasses that many people wear.

Also keep in mind that a magnifying glass is a solid material, the atmoplane is not.  In fact, the atmoplane gets less and less substantial the higher you go, so what is there to project the image of the sun and moon onto?
« Last Edit: August 20, 2019, 12:19:33 PM by markjo »
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

boydster

  • Brute Squad Support
  • Planar Moderator
  • 12810
  • You keep using that word.
Re: Mountains on the Moon
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2019, 12:20:29 PM »
This is not the place to debate, folks.
Let me explain this in a way you can understand. What you just wrote sounds exactly like something that a gay rights Portuguese Samurai would write.