WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread

  • 833 Replies
  • 90644 Views
*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65295
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #90 on: February 18, 2019, 04:11:46 AM »
Oh I don't think Dave is suspicious either, was just explaining to him.
I like the idea of picking our ghost council leader, someone volunteer though - who wants to be the most important person?
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #91 on: February 18, 2019, 04:22:23 AM »

CFC hasn't incriminated himself blatantly so far this game, so he's probably guilty.


Eat shit Jane, I just started posting in this thread this morning, been sick this weekend.... Everytime you try and accuse me you are a baddie.. I am not a baddie this game just like the last...

Since you are attacking proactively as usual, you show your bad side.. I had you to rights last game by your third post.. The more proactively attacking you are, you simply prove your guilt.

If I hadn't used my vote to cancel a vote for Dave, I would cast one for you right now.

If there were a good chance of a hit on the first day, I would put it for Jane, she is already showing her usual signs of guilt... I told you to work on your tell last game, and the game before that.
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #92 on: February 18, 2019, 04:26:33 AM »
Jesus christ learn to take a joke.

I like the idea of picking our ghost council leader, someone volunteer though - who wants to be the most important person?
Probably the wildcard. Can we please not have a repeat of that?
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

Wolvaccine

  • EXTRA SPICY MODE
  • 25833
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #93 on: February 18, 2019, 04:28:53 AM »

CFC hasn't incriminated himself blatantly so far this game, so he's probably guilty.


Eat shit Jane, I just started posting in this thread this morning, been sick this weekend.... Everytime you try and accuse me you are a baddie.. I am not a baddie this game just like the last...

Since you are attacking proactively as usual, you show your bad side.. I had you to rights last game by your third post.. The more proactively attacking you are, you simply prove your guilt.

If I hadn't used my vote to cancel a vote for Dave, I would cast one for you right now.

If there were a good chance of a hit on the first day, I would put it for Jane, she is already showing her usual signs of guilt... I told you to work on your tell last game, and the game before that.

Yeah, I'm sick of Jane's up her self nonsense. We can at least shut her up for half the time by turning her into a ghost

[I vote to lynch Jane]


Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

Know your place

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #94 on: February 18, 2019, 04:31:43 AM »
A sacrifice just doesn't work, the only reason NSS worked out so well that one game, was he was killed by a baddie.

The only way we can be for sure is if the werewolf is killed (as this game is the same as the others where it only says a villager was killed), however, in a way it would be sacrificing two players to get one guaranteed safe player.

I don't know if it would be 100 percent worth it or not...maybe since there are so many players, I dunno.
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #95 on: February 18, 2019, 04:34:36 AM »

We can at least shut her up for half the time by turning her into a ghost

[I vote to lynch Jane]

Ha ha ha....shots fired!!
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #96 on: February 18, 2019, 04:35:43 AM »
If there is a spirit magician, so please read the define of your role, agree to be lynched in first day, and ensure a villager victory.
That's risky. If any evil team has some vote-interfering power, you've just told them who to save and who not to kill tonight. There's already been two votes cast so the politician, for example, has plenty to work with to redirect.

Dave's tricky. On one hand he's new and used to the old werewolf games, so he likely has a different playstyle. On the other hand he's smart enough to use that as cover. Equally Wise wanting a role to out themselves is... weird, but he's also Wise so doesn't have to be suspicious.
CFC hasn't incriminated himself blatantly so far this game, so he's probably guilty.
Franklin is quiet... too quiet.
I'm down with lynching on the first day, just usually better to wait until closer to dusk so you're a little more informed about how everyone else acts. I'm pretty sure we go back and forth on this all the time; last I remember not lynching on the first day was a sure sign that evil's going to have an easier time of it.

I'm going to instead spend my time chilling by the bar. I like nibbles. There had better be nibbles, you hear?  >:(

I think the problem you talk about has been already solved. Dave has been cancelled his vote and cfc has cancelled jura's voting. zero to zero.

Votings: zero. Politican can not do anything in this position.

I agree your thoughs about Franklin. I think this before game has been started, because of some psicologic reasons I have considered him assigned as an evil. But even so this is not enough to blame him. we learned from previous games that a player's silence does not reduce his suspicions about him, but rather increases. I think we should focus on the silent players. All other players, includingfranklin at the top of the list, are doubtful to me. all of them. Even so I am in the side of wait to decisions of psichic and empaths. If there is a bad scam artist there and they don't know each other at the moment, I'd laugh if a penguin killed a NASA or vice versa.

Sorry I saw a vote above. Recent votings:

jane-1
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #97 on: February 18, 2019, 04:39:11 AM »

CFC hasn't incriminated himself blatantly so far this game, so he's probably guilty.


Eat shit Jane, I just started posting in this thread this morning, been sick this weekend.... Everytime you try and accuse me you are a baddie.. I am not a baddie this game just like the last...

Since you are attacking proactively as usual, you show your bad side.. I had you to rights last game by your third post.. The more proactively attacking you are, you simply prove your guilt.

If I hadn't used my vote to cancel a vote for Dave, I would cast one for you right now.

If there were a good chance of a hit on the first day, I would put it for Jane, she is already showing her usual signs of guilt... I told you to work on your tell last game, and the game before that.

Yeah, I'm sick of Jane's up her self nonsense. We can at least shut her up for half the time by turning her into a ghost

[I vote to lynch Jane]

Hmm. It may be interesting jane's being the leader of ghost counsil. Come on man, this is first day, we have not to do this.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #98 on: February 18, 2019, 04:39:59 AM »
I'm down with that, so long as I get to lord it over CFC in future games.

On a ghost council note though, it might be advantageous if we have no leads to go for someone who's hard to read, and who could be a smart contact. Not someone to just PM all our roles to because, well, wildcard is always a possibility, but still. Someone with few tells would be a smart play because they're harder to lynch based on suspicion, and if we want to kill without much to go on, who better than someone we likely wouldn't turn to later anyway?

Votings: zero. Politican can not do anything in this position.
I used to have it so that the politician could work with cancelled votes too, so long as they've been cast. Plus Dave cancelled his own vote, we've had no-takebacks before even when there's been regret. Depends on how Junker's playing this game.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #99 on: February 18, 2019, 04:47:21 AM »
I'm down with that, so long as I get to lord it over CFC in future games.

On a ghost council note though, it might be advantageous if we have no leads to go for someone who's hard to read, and who could be a smart contact. Not someone to just PM all our roles to because, well, wildcard is always a possibility, but still. Someone with few tells would be a smart play because they're harder to lynch based on suspicion, and if we want to kill without much to go on, who better than someone we likely wouldn't turn to later anyway?

Votings: zero. Politican can not do anything in this position.
I used to have it so that the politician could work with cancelled votes too, so long as they've been cast. Plus Dave cancelled his own vote, we've had no-takebacks before even when there's been regret. Depends on how Junker's playing this game.

I believe Dave has used his vote as an experienced player without using brackets for change it if required. Junker can agree his first vote then it turns to:

jane -1
dave -1

But if it agrees it not valid then junker can give him use another vote right.

Then it turns Jane-1.

But even so it is easy to cancel this vote. You can do it by yourself and I don't think anybody intervene it.

It is clear that Dave has did it a type of made the Junker's job harder.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #100 on: February 18, 2019, 04:52:45 AM »
I'm down with that, so long as I get to lord it over CFC in future games.

On a ghost council note though, it might be advantageous if we have no leads to go for someone who's hard to read, and who could be a smart contact. Not someone to just PM all our roles to because, well, wildcard is always a possibility, but still. Someone with few tells would be a smart play because they're harder to lynch based on suspicion, and if we want to kill without much to go on, who better than someone we likely wouldn't turn to later anyway?

It would also need to be a player that is active and communicates..as anyone who has lead the ghost council, it is a fair amount of work to do it properly.

There is one negative and two positives for me...

Negative- I think I can be more useful in game...

Positives-
I am active and communicate..
I wouldn't have to hear shit from Jane the next few games.

So, I offer myself as a possible sacrifice, just putting everything  out there.
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #101 on: February 18, 2019, 05:06:55 AM »
I'm down with that, so long as I get to lord it over CFC in future games.

On a ghost council note though, it might be advantageous if we have no leads to go for someone who's hard to read, and who could be a smart contact. Not someone to just PM all our roles to because, well, wildcard is always a possibility, but still. Someone with few tells would be a smart play because they're harder to lynch based on suspicion, and if we want to kill without much to go on, who better than someone we likely wouldn't turn to later anyway?

It would also need to be a player that is active and communicates..as anyone who has lead the ghost council, it is a fair amount of work to do it properly.

There is one negative and two positives for me...

Negative- I think I can be more useful in game...

Positives-
I am active and communicate..
I wouldn't have to hear shit from Jane the next few games.

So, I offer myself as a possible sacrifice, just putting everything  out there.

If you are the spirit magician so I can agree your sacrifice.

Otherwise I have to defend you like how shifter did. Because you did the true thing by canceling the votes were going to lynch somebody those actually were not necessary. jane doesn't seem like someone to make such simple mistakes from the first day, because it is not a good behaviour to backbite anybody, and she did it after you have used your voting right. maybe it would be interesting to see who would support jane by voting and holding her with 2 votes. but it is still better to wait without voting anybody. it would be interesting that she would  lead the ghost council. on the other hand, I would bet that if she were the wildcard would be the worst wildcard, and she would probably win this game on her own. I do not want to give her this chance.

According to her talkings, if she were a penguin her partner may be the politican. How can I get this? Depends on her talkings. She is baiting the junker for learn how Junker will agree the position of politican. But a politican can lead the votes to someone else to cause us to think she is an evil. So that we have to wait the ghost counsil before do a mistake.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #102 on: February 18, 2019, 05:12:33 AM »
According to her talkings, if she were a penguin her partner may be the politican. How can I get this? Depends on her talkings. She is baiting the junker for learn how Junker will agree the position of politican. But a politican can lead the votes to someone else to cause us to think she is an evil. So that we have to wait the ghost counsil before do a mistake.
If I had a super sneaky question for a secret plan I'd just PM it. Don't know if that makes me more or less suspicious, but just saying.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #103 on: February 18, 2019, 05:18:06 AM »
According to her talkings, if she were a penguin her partner may be the politican. How can I get this? Depends on her talkings. She is baiting the junker for learn how Junker will agree the position of politican. But a politican can lead the votes to someone else to cause us to think she is an evil. So that we have to wait the ghost counsil before do a mistake.
If I had a super sneaky question for a secret plan I'd just PM it. Don't know if that makes me more or less suspicious, but just saying.
just I think it out loud. Maybe it would be interesting you to lead the ghost council. because we learned what happened when the inept people led the council, but just thinking.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #104 on: February 18, 2019, 05:26:05 AM »
because we learned what happened when the inept people led the council, but just thinking.

Who was inept in leading the council?
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #105 on: February 18, 2019, 05:35:00 AM »
because we learned what happened when the inept people led the council, but just thinking.

Who was inept in leading the council?

I don't want to give his name here, but not here now.   ;D
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Junker

  • 3926
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #106 on: February 18, 2019, 05:35:15 AM »
After my warnings to the guests on the importance of moderation when it comes to alcohol, I was summarily ignored. It is obvious Lorddave had too much to drink and started mumbling about he is control of his life and how he was going to take out Jura. This wasn't a real threat (not in brackets), but the barkeep overheard anyway. Upon inquiring, Dave, with his newfound liquid courage and commitment to stop taking a backseat in life tried to reaffirm that he was serious (went back and edited his post in the proper brackets). Not long thereafter, Dave's tolerance failed him. He went outside to vomit while hot tears poured from his eyes and he reflected on how he can't do anything right. Once he collected himself, he went back inside and begged junker to not tell anyone about this and that he will conduct himself like a gentleman going forward. He is heading off to nurse the inevitable hangover that is coming soon.

In general, I won't allow take-backs of votes. I also won't acknowledge edits of posts since that could cause a whole new set of issues for narration. In this scenario, there has already been a snowball effect from an invalid vote that ended up being edited to appear valid. While Dave's initial vote was invalid, he made a valid cancel vote that shouldn't have been needed in the first place. In the interest of keeping the game moving, the vote count is currently:

Jane - 1

Dave doesn't get to re-vote. He will be spending time recovering from poor decisions.


*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #107 on: February 18, 2019, 05:47:22 AM »
After my warnings to the guests on the importance of moderation when it comes to alcohol, I was summarily ignored. It is obvious Lorddave had too much to drink and started mumbling about he is control of his life and how he was going to take out Jura. This wasn't a real threat (not in brackets), but the barkeep overheard anyway. Upon inquiring, Dave, with his newfound liquid courage and commitment to stop taking a backseat in life tried to reaffirm that he was serious (went back and edited his post in the proper brackets). Not long thereafter, Dave's tolerance failed him. He went outside to vomit while hot tears poured from his eyes and he reflected on how he can't do anything right. Once he collected himself, he went back inside and begged junker to not tell anyone about this and that he will conduct himself like a gentleman going forward. He is heading off to nurse the inevitable hangover that is coming soon.

In general, I won't allow take-backs of votes. I also won't acknowledge edits of posts since that could cause a whole new set of issues for narration. In this scenario, there has already been a snowball effect from an invalid vote that ended up being edited to appear valid. While Dave's initial vote was invalid, he made a valid cancel vote that shouldn't have been needed in the first place. In the interest of keeping the game moving, the vote count is currently:

Jane - 1

Dave doesn't get to re-vote. He will be spending time recovering from poor decisions.

Ok, so from the sounds of this, we all have our votes restored excluding Dave and shifter?
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Slemon

  • Flat Earth Researcher
  • 12330
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #108 on: February 18, 2019, 05:47:50 AM »
Speaking of secret plans.
If you are more concerned with getting a ghost council leader than finding an evil team, vote to lynch me. May be able to prove I'm not a wildcard. Just saying.
We all know deep in our hearts that Jane is the last face we'll see before we're choked to death!

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #109 on: February 18, 2019, 05:58:08 AM »
We saw bad examples of how players have lack of experience leading the counsil villagers are going to lose the game. Considering her talkings about cfc as she sure his being evil, with lack of evidences already makes her suspect. And if she was a villager can lead the counsil as well. I strongly believe we have to do this.

Under these circumstances I have decided to:

[I vote to lynch Jane]

jane-2
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Junker

  • 3926
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #110 on: February 18, 2019, 05:59:12 AM »
Ok, so from the sounds of this, we all have our votes restored excluding Dave and shifter?

Correct.

*

Lorddave

  • 18593
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #111 on: February 18, 2019, 06:30:47 AM »
Sorry for causing a mess.
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #112 on: February 18, 2019, 06:45:31 AM »
We saw bad examples of how players have lack of experience leading the counsil villagers are going to lose the game. Considering her talkings about cfc as she sure his being evil, with lack of evidences already makes her suspect. And if she was a villager can lead the counsil as well. I strongly believe we have to do this.

Under these circumstances I have decided to:

[I vote to lynch Jane]

jane-2

Agreed..... I originally thought she was suspicious, however, after some talking through PM, I believe she is innocent which she will also be able to prove after her death.

I think a proven innocent ghost leader, with the brains able to work such a thing (as much as it makes me nauseous to say something good about a mortal enemy) is the most important player in the game for the villagers. Having someone all the villagers with special powers can funnel all the information to at night is something very useful and can help remove a few days and deaths.

So for this reason

[I vote to lynch Jane]

3-Jane
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Wolvaccine

  • EXTRA SPICY MODE
  • 25833
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #113 on: February 18, 2019, 06:55:22 AM »
Jane seems a little too accepting of a death. If she is the wildcard wanting to lead a ghost council that could make sense. Her proof better be good.

Quote from: sokarul
what website did you use to buy your wife? Did you choose Chinese over Russian because she can't open her eyes to see you?

What animal relates to your wife?

Know your place

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #114 on: February 18, 2019, 07:05:57 AM »
Jane seems a little too accepting of a death. If she is the wildcard wanting to lead a ghost council that could make sense. Her proof better be good.

In my opinion we have to check her role with psichic or empath as soon as possible. Because trusting the ghost leader is more important than number of villagers in this stage. We can only be sure about her after check it. We have to do this.

Psichic has to check her tonight.

If she were the psichic had to say this. Since she said not anything about this I believe she isn't an empath or psichic so can die. Since she has agreed to die so that there is a possiblity being wildcard. Till somebody check her, we can not trust her being an ordinary villager or wildcard.
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #115 on: February 18, 2019, 07:07:22 AM »
Jane seems a little too accepting of a death. If she is the wildcard wanting to lead a ghost council that could make sense. Her proof better be good.

I agree with this 100 percent... The ways she can show proof will be 100 percent if she keeps up her end of the bargain. If she doesn't, then we know what to do after that!
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6543
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #116 on: February 18, 2019, 07:12:47 AM »

Kill her again?
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 26236
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #117 on: February 18, 2019, 07:20:04 AM »

Kill her again?

Yes, you can kill her one more time.  ;D
1+2+3+...+∞= 1

Ignored:

Jura II (until 2031)
Bulma (Until 2030)
Jackblack (Until 2032)

I知 I a globalist AI.

*

Bom Tishop

  • 11198
  • Official friend boy of the FES!!
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #118 on: February 18, 2019, 07:23:43 AM »

Kill her again?

Yes, either she is a lying penguin/NASA and we will already have one baddie down.

Or she is what she says and she will be able to show proof with her death by her power. Then we have a guaranteed innocent that can well handle the ghost council lead role which is super important.

Also, if she doesn't show proof with her death of said power, and nothing happens but she is shown villager with her death, then that will show she is the wild card.

So we either have a dead baddie may that be a wild card/NASA/penguin.

Or we have a innocent leader for the ghost council that can certainly handle the job.

There is literally no downside for this (unless you are a baddie)...

So, vote to lynch Jane everyone....if you are good.
Quote from: Bom Tishop
LordDave is quite alright even for a bleeding heart liberal. Godspeed good sir

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • The Elder Ones
  • 50933
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: WP XI - Hotel California - Game Thread
« Reply #119 on: February 18, 2019, 07:49:01 AM »
WTF? It's too early to start drinking.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.