Who dares to perform the same method of measuring C/D ?
I guess nobody dares
I dare.
As everyone knows, you suck at precision measurement.
You don't even know what to measure.
In your video you measure from tip to tip of two notches of different depths. You should have measured from the base of where you made the original cut.
It makes a difference. You're measuring a distance that's too long. Go back and fish your piece of paper out of the trash and measure the correct distance.
Approximate scaling from your video, gives that your 22.85 should be closer to 22.65
Danang: 22.85 / 7.2 = 3.1736 (not 3.17157)
Corrected: 22.65 / 7.2 = 3.1458
And you haven't even bothered putting error bars on the measurements. Since you're so sloppy with measurements, let's be generous and say you're accurate to 0.5 mm. (0.05 cm)
The range of measurements is 22.6 / 7.25 = 3.117 to 22.7 / 7.15 = 3.175. You don't even have the accuracy to distinguish pi from your imaginary phew.
And I did do the experiment, but I actually know how to make a careful measurement.
(231.0mm +/- 0.2mm) [paper, but circumference measured correctly around a cylindrical not conical glass] / 73.5mm +/- 0.05mm [using calipers] = 3.138 to 3.148
You really do need to get a new hobby.