Inflammatory Signatures

I received a warning for having a signature that called wise a turd.  It was a photoshop of his forum profile, with the avatar replaced with a giant angry poop emoji.  It was posted as my signature for about a day, before I was asked to take it down and received a warning.  The warning was for an inflammatory signature.

To keep the story short, I created the signature after wise reposted his "reenkarned hitler" signature.  If he can call me reenkarned hitler in his signature I will call him a turd in mine.  After discussion with the administration and moderator who issued the warning, I stated my position on the matter and took the signature down.

Wise was also asked to remove his signature.  Which he seemed to comply with.

Now, wise has posted a new signature which is still inflammatory.  Calling someone a racist without proof of them being a racist in a signature is inflammatory.  Wise either does not know what inflammatory is or is willfully circumventing the rule to not have an inflammatory signature.

Do you see a crybaby around? We have to change his diaper.

NSS.
You do not sound to me like a person who is a finely balanced snowflake, a potential jumper or depressive, on the contrary you seem robust and confrontational, able to hold their own, I may be wrong but that is the impression I get.

So, when I see this, you feeling buthurt that you can’t call someone a turd while feigning indignation at a label given to you by someone, that more than anyone here, probably does fit some of the criteria above, and that you, more than anyone here, goes out of their way to wind up at every opportunity, then I call bollocks, you have courted a place on the list as have many and now want to play poor me?

Fuck out NSS, go mow the lawn.

Love Jura.

Flaming and harassment is not allowed, including within signatures. Wise was warned, as were you NSS. Wise is now on vacation. Stones and glass houses, though... You and wise obviously enjoy trying to get under each other's skin. Stop the madness.