You not liking the reasons doesn't make them not reasons.
There is nothing in my post about I either like or don't like the reasons. Your denying the facts depend on childish dreaming can not make tthe arguments weaker or stronger. Grow up and give up childish behaviours.
It is a statement of fact. You make the claim, the burden of proof is on you.
Your claiming its being "Statement of fact" does not make it magically a statement of fact. You have to prove its being proved. the burden of proof is on you, if you agree or if you deny.
Stop lying. There is plenty, you just reject it.
No you. There isn't anything to reject.
Regardless, you were the one who brought up the oceans, not us.
I think I am not but God has brought up the oceans. Stop to behave like me a God, because I am not.
You brought up your baseless claim of them not working in the ocean to try to refute GPS.
Again, it is not a claim but fact; till you prove they are so. You don't talk about it because you don't like it. It does not stop me you whether like GPS doesn't work inner oceans or not. It does not work andburden of proof is in your side to prove they are so.
So again, the burden is on you to show that it doesn't work, not us.
Again, it isn'T. Burden of proof is on your side.
Unless you can, we can dismiss the ocean entirely as completely irrelevant to the topic.
Stop to talk inconsistent. It is completely related the issue. Topic is about how GPS work and my statement queries whether it works in oceans or not. If you researched how GPS work, so you have to research how GPS work in Oceans. Let me know which part of this sentence you are unable to understand?
I'm not just talking about this topic.
So you have agreed you are not talking about issue. In one hand, you are admitting your crime that you are not talking about issue. On the other hand, you are blaming me to talk off the topic although it is completely a part of topic. Grow up abd give up childish behaviours.
I am talking about every time proof or evidence which shows you are wrong has been provided to you.
Your talking about proof or evidences does not makes your claims magically proved. Everybody here talk about proof, the important think to prove something. You did not ever did it. Showing something isn't a proof. You can show every kind of shits, can not make them magically proof or evidences.
You just dismiss it as fake or lies or completely ignore it, just like you have done here.
I am open every kind of proof or evidences. Until now you are just making word salat but denying to provide real evidences.
Yes, how GPS works, i.e. how it uses satellites transmitting to Earth, using time to determine the distance to these satellites and then math, based upon a RE, to determine the position of the receiver.
That sure seems to match what I said.
Furthermore it discusses the impossibility or insanity of trying to fake GPS using land based transmitters pretending to be satellites.
All your claims are theorical claims. It may be like that, it may be not like that. You need a proof shows satellites when working. Since the existance of satellites have not proven so your claims are imaginary, and your math of imagination proves nothing.
Yes, it isn't very different to the mountains of proof/evidence that you routinely reject because it shows you are wrong.
Since I am the not one claim something there isn't anything prove me wrong. Again, showing something isn't a proof. You can show whatever you want. I show you, you show me, you show rabinoz, all these shows don't prove anything. We are not playing a TV show here that you are constantly show something. Do not show, but prove if you can. You can not. But the best thing you do is show.
Again, you have shown the only evidence you will ever accept is evidence you have obtained yourself.
I don't think so. Your denying provide evidence and your claim of burden of proof's being my side is your claim isn't my order to you. You can listen my advice and try to provide evidences. Grow up and give up childish behaviour. Either provide evidences or give up to blame me deny evidences those already have not been provided. Inother say, I am denying something absent. Denying absent isn'T denying anything in the name of evidence or proof.
As such, asking/demanding we provide proof is extremely dishonest as you know you will never accept any provided.
Who you in the word "we?". How many are you talking together? And you've accepted you have provided just extremely dishonest so called proofs can not be prove anything because of they are extremely dishonest as you accepted it. Stop to provide extremely dishonest so called proofs, then it will be better.
If you want proof that GPS works in ocean go and obtain the only proof you would accept.
Yes I want to proof GPS whether work in ocean or not. Since there isn't any proof their work, I accepted it doesn't work till it has been proven. I do not have to go inner ocean to examine every kind of shits.
Burden of proof belongs to who claim it. You claim, you have to prove.
Take a standalone GPS receiver and go to middle of the ocean and see if it works.
Thanks. I prefer you do it, if you have a claim it works.
Before making any more dishonest demands for proof be sure to clearly explain just what proof you would accept.
I accepted this you are talking at a mirror. Because you have accepted you have provided "dishonest proofs" above so you are who has to give up provide dishonest claims.
But looking at it in detail, including the technical details can show what seemed to be possible to be pure insanity.
It can show something be possible. But it can not prove anything. Opposite of it can be possible too. Math only shows how something work, but definitely can not be an evidence. Your try to use them as argument definitely does not work here. This is just vaste of time like everything related you.
You don't need to be a master to understand these simple parts.
Understand or talk are different things. Stop to talk on issue you are not a master.
It is clear you are just looking for excuses to avoid this massive problem for FE.
Nope. Again, numbers can not be an evidence of anything. Math only works to explain something how works. But it does not prove anything. If something has proved exist you can claim you explain it by some maths. It may be true, it may be imagination. Math isn't an evidence at all in any way.
No you can't.
Yes I can. Prove I can't.
The proof is how the numbers match up with reality or a potential model.
Numbers can match up with your claim does not your claim magically true or wrong. It is just an estimated solution. Although you can explain something with number still may be true or not.
I want to give you a simple example you get it.
"You claim you are heavier than me". We have been weighed, then we see you are heavier. So you have supported it with numbers, right? You are 110 and me 90, so you have proved, right? So what happens if I say the scales being out of order? Is a claim or a proof? It is a claim. you can say that the scale is correct. I would say it is corrupt as well. my argument is this. I am heavier than you, and this scale makes you look heavier than me, so it is broken. To prove otherwise, we only need to weigh the two objects we agree on. the burden of proof does not belong to me here. Because before we weigh, I tell you that the scale is broken. Your balance is broken, you're not fair, you're a liar.
These numbers show that you can't fake a satellite based system using ground based transmitters, at least not without basically making all of Earth transmitters.
No they are not. Numbers are just show you can provide every kind of BS claims depend on numbers.
No. It is not your business.
Again,
You are not a flat earther and deciding what flat earthers do is clearly not your business. Stop to snooping.
You already believe Earth is flat and don't care about any justification for it.
Almost like this. I have proved the earth's being flat to myself and denying the nonsences.
The business of deciding what you need to address is based upon the arguments put forth by competing models and those who support them.
Again, you can not decide anything about me, but I do it. Your claiming you can do nothing but BS. I simply deny your suggestions and you are talking to yourself, what that means? None of flat earthers take your advices serious. Because a flat earther generally is a man more and more smarter than a globularist, definitely does not take advice of them. A flat earther can take an advice only from another flat earther. Because only another flat earther can be smart enough till be more experienced on any issue.
Now grow up and look at your own business, ie providing BS claims and prove they work in inner oceans.