How do we know we North Pole is in the middle and not the South Pole?

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

As upper post says, it is agreed as place. And you can make a simple test to check it whether its being a center or not.



Any place near North Pole you can use compass in two different places. By comparing the directions of compass needle, depending upon the angle of these two directions whether acute angle or wide angle, you can get if it is a pole or not. 

In same way, you can prove there is not a pole in southern somewhere. Then the simultaned directions will splaying the outer places.

Have you ever done this experiment before?
Well if you did this and the results are as shown, you would prove that Earth is flat.
However, when doing so, you have to travel a long distance to make the angle significant. Which, I believe, would make the measurment of the angle difficult.

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:19:07 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

Yes, because it works.

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 05:17:43 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:19:07 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

Yes, because it works.

It may be simulate anything. Being true of some numbers can not prove a phsical object's existance. You have to observe or prove its existance. Tell eutelsat convince me with evidences. Till that time, I can say absent however I want. Absent, absent, absent,...

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 06:28:32 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 05:17:43 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:19:07 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

Yes, because it works.

It may be simulate anything. Being true of some numbers can not prove a phsical object's existance. You have to observe or prove its existance. Tell eutelsat convince me with evidences. Till that time, I can say absent however I want. Absent, absent, absent,...

I do not have to do anything. I have shown details of satellites used by milions for tv reception. If you do not understand this then fine.

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 06:58:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 06:28:32 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 05:17:43 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:19:07 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

Yes, because it works.

It may be simulate anything. Being true of some numbers can not prove a phsical object's existance. You have to observe or prove its existance. Tell eutelsat convince me with evidences. Till that time, I can say absent however I want. Absent, absent, absent,...

I do not have to do anything. I have shown details of satellites used by milions for tv reception. If you do not understand this then fine.

You provide just a peace wrong predicted media lie. TV receptions can not evidence of satellites existance. I can use a computer and can claim this compute produced in Mars. Whether I can prove this computer is exist, working properly but can not be an evidence of  produced in Mars.

I hope you get this but I don't think so.

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 08:17:18 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 06:58:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 06:28:32 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 05:17:43 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:19:07 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 04:16:15 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 04:02:08 AM

Quote from: wise on January 20, 2019, 03:41:47 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:24:13 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:08:36 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:06:09 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Swedish on January 20, 2019, 02:02:38 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on January 20, 2019, 02:00:11 AM

Drones and planes move, dish angle points to a transmitter over the equator.  Plus read the documentation.

You think satellites don't move? Lol? Even your round earth physics are bad as heck!

Geosynchronous, as you know.  At least you agree they exist!

And planes or drones (high up!) couldn't just circle in a spot, eh?

If satellites move geosynchrous, how comes gps reception (amount of sats) varies from day to day, even if at the same location?

Broadcast eg. TV satellites are geosynchronous over the equator.

GPS satellites orbit.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator. It may be a joke.

Known fact above equator, check where satellite TV dishes point to.

There isn't any satellites observed around equator.  The point of satellite dishes has not to be through equator. In our country some of them turned through Russia and I've proved it by tens of pictures.

Another lie?

See https://www.eutelsat.com/en/satellites/find-your-satellite.html

Understand?

So I have to trust eutelsat, right? Have I not a right to deny eutelsat like NASA, because of I'm believing in Europe?

Yes, because it works.

It may be simulate anything. Being true of some numbers can not prove a phsical object's existance. You have to observe or prove its existance. Tell eutelsat convince me with evidences. Till that time, I can say absent however I want. Absent, absent, absent,...

I do not have to do anything. I have shown details of satellites used by milions for tv reception. If you do not understand this then fine.

You provide just a peace wrong predicted media lie. TV receptions can not evidence of satellites existance. I can use a computer and can claim this compute produced in Mars. Whether I can prove this computer is exist, working properly but can not be an evidence of  produced in Mars.

I hope you get this but I don't think so.

Please provide details of how TV satellite dishes work. Where is the transmitter, detailed location please.

You provide just a peace wrong predicted media lie. TV receptions can not evidence of satellites existance. I can use a computer and can claim this compute produced in Mars. Whether I can prove this computer is exist, working properly but can not be an evidence of  produced in Mars.

I hope you get this but I don't think so.

Really?
Where does the signal come from for these satellite TV dishes on houses near the equator?

Satellite TV dishes on the Equator. What are they pointing at?? There aren't any "microwave towers" up there!

Why do many caravanners travelling Central Australia have satellite TV dishes like this?

They use dishes like that to receive TV signals and an internet connection in regions where there is no terrestrial TV or cell phone coverage.
Look at the large areas of Australia with no cell-phone coverage and in many cases no TV coverage so satellite phone, TV and internet is used:

Telstra Coverage Map, Australia, 2019-01-21

---

Now, Wise, don't bother your head over the following bit because YOU are incapable of understanding it.

Others might realise the significance of the moving trails of light and the tiny stationary spots of light.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on July 03, 2016, 12:40:16 AM

Quote from: palmerito0 on July 02, 2016, 01:16:16 PM

What is your problem with it?

That he doesn't agree. Seriously, that's it.

He simply doesn't understand the significance of it!
Just like when some see a picture like this and simply cannot see the most significant features - the tiny stationary white dots!

Quote from: Blue_Moon on April 20, 2016, 01:08:05 PM

You can see the most of the satellites lined up along the earth's equator, and the others are following analemmas, as geosynchronous satellites do.  Each of these satellites can be tied to a specific launch.  They can't be natural satellites, because they only started appearing when we started launching them, and they are in orbits that were carefully chosen for their intended purpose, as are all artificial satellites.  It's much easier to observe lower satellites, though.  Geostationary satellites are too far away to get anything but a faint image.

Some see the significance of those "little lights in the sky", and some are so close-minded and blinkered that they mean nothing!

When my boat goes from Singapore to Rio in Brazil, I can go via Suez Canal and the Med (11,244 nautical miles), or via Cape of South Africa (8,830 nautical miles.)  So it is shorter going the longer way according to the flat map!

the north pole is in the middle because all flat earth maps are based on a globe

the north pole is in the middle because all flat earth maps are based on a globe

And Rowbotham lived in the United Kingdom and never once visited anywhere in the Southern Hemisphere.
Hence all his knowledge about the Southern Hemisphere was based on his interpretation of what explorers and others wrote about it.

As well as that, in Rowbotham's time, Antarctica had not been explored and no one had been to the South Pole.
So he thought that few would be able to refute his claim that Antarctica was a barrier around the flat earth to keep the oceans from pouring off the edge.

didnt know that but even without knowing it, best evidence is your trying to put a 3D object on to a 2D surface so i suppose you could take a basketball slice it from a point you would consider the top to the opposite side, flatten it out on to a piece of paper. theres going to a lot of gaps on the outer edges so whats the easiest thing to do... just a draw a circle filling in the gaps and that is the flat earth model but i dont think they get that!

Couple good tidbits in here.

Loved wise's admittnace that he has a map but his map had too many errors in it.

2nd
Keeps using the term gps.
Oh man!

3rd
Always boils down to conspiracy.
Alcan's having a sale.
Stock up.