It should be blatantly obvious to people seeing as atmospheric pressure is the very thing that keeps everything moving
No it isn't.
What is blatantly obvious to everyone accept you apparently is that you are directly contradicting yourself.
Again, why should it be the atmosphere that keeps everything moving when you claim that is what stops things moving?
You can't have it both ways.
What is obvious to everyone is that air and other fluids try to prevent relative motion, not keep them in motion.
It is obvious to everyone except you that if the rocket keeps its thrust constant (by ejecting the same amount of fuel) it will continue to accelerate as it is losing mass, and will likely accelerate faster.
the big dupe of pretending a rocket can thrust its burning fuel out of a nozzle and equally kick its own insides above to push it through the atmosphere.
Again, you trying to make it appear ridiculous doesn't magically make it wrong.
Go learn basic physics. Do the experiments to figure out how it works.
Stop with the pathetic ridicule which amounts to nothing more than stating you are wilfully ignorant.
Easy enough for people to be duped if they refuse to question it.
Which is why I question your BS rather than be duped by it.
Questioning reality doesn't make you better when you still reject reality.
A valve eh?
Again, your pathetic ridicule just shows you don't care about reality.
No they won't. Not vertically.
Again, repeating the same lie doesn't magically make it true.
We have videos and experiments we have conducted and statements from rocket manufacturers
No it's not.
Don't just assert it isn't.
Explain why it is magically different.
Again, here is reality for you:
The air is a fluid and as such will interact with any substance moving through it. This interaction results in a force which is dependent upon the velocity. An object moving quickly through the fluid will need to push the fluid out of the way and experiences drag as it moves relative the fluid.
An object stationary relative to the fluid does not experience this as it doesn't need to push the fluid out of the way nor is the fluid moving past it.
There is no dependence on directionality here.
Again, the only difference is that for horizontal motion the air remains fairly constant, but for vertical motion the air gets less dense as you get higher.
So it's not the same, is it?
Are you capable of basic reasoning?
It not being the same makes it better for vertical projectiles as they don't have as much air resistance slowing them down.
If that was all there was they would go further.
In an arc, of course.
Then they wouldn't be vertical.
Do you understand what vertical means?
An object fired straight up is slowed down less due to air resistance than an object fired horizontally.
Now do you have anything rational backing up any of your lies, or do you only have lies, appeal to ridicule and wilful ignorance?