If a rocket can lift off at less than maximum thr4ust
Again, maximum thrust would be an explosion where all fuel is spent at once and no rocket does that.
throttle up that thrust then it will accelerate.
Nope. No need for it to increase throttle to accelerate.
The problem with this is, it's a pointless rocket/missile.
You not understanding how rockets work doesn't make them pointless. It serves no purpose and would be so unstable as to render it a danger to its initial surrounding area.
Full thrust or bust.
No, full thrust would mean bust.
Yep and only for a split second before resistance arrests that max velocity. From there is simply decreases in upward momentum until friction gripped to a stop and then acceleration towards the ground begins, until terminal velocity is attained or it simply hits the ground under acceleration.
Yes, notice how it doesn't just stop dead after the initial bang stops? It keeps moving upwards, just like a rocket would.
The rocket at full thrust will reach maximum velocity
Again, stop just asserting garbage.
Everything shows you are wrong.
There is literally nothign to support your insane claims.
If you wish to continue asserting such garbage you will need vastly more than your baseless claim.
just like the bullet
No, nothing like a bullet.
A bullet is fired with an explosion where all the fuel is used at once. A rocket does not.
Merely saying people see slow motion launches is not proof of anything.
No, people see them in real time.
They observe the rockets start out slow and increase speed (i.e. accelerate).
It wouldn't be akin to the stone being released. The stone is still under momentum from energy applied in the slingshot.
Yes, just like the rocket is still under momentum from the energy applied while the rocket engine was on.
The stone is slowing down on the vertical. It loses its maximum velocity as immediate as it gained it.
No it doesn't.
It can gain it extremely quickly and lose it quite slowly.
If it lost its maximum velocity as immediately as it gained it it wouldn't go very high, just the height of the slingshot.
A rocket would still be max thrusting and keeping a constant velocity
Quit spouting the same BS. If you want anyone to take that garbage seriously you will need more than the same repeated, refuted, pathetic baseless assertion.
It's a different scenario to a constant velocity rocket and constant max thrust.
Good thing no one is talking about such a fantasy as that except you.
We are talking about real rockets.
Because the max thrust to keep a constant velocity
Has nothing to do with it.
Again, we are talking about real rockets.
But even then, still no reason for it to stop dead instantly.
I simple analogy.
No, here is a simple analogy, one you already used, a rock in a sling.
When it leaves the sling it doesn't stop dead, it continues moving up.
Basically you would hit maximum velocity (however tiny) before slowing down in short order but still moving up as you slow down.
Even with your pathetic analogy, you keep moving upwards, so why does the rocket magically stop dead?
Why is this magical event never observed by anyone?
The slow launches are merely gimmicks.
HOW? You seem to love just dismissing real factual rockets as gimmicks, but provide no alternative explanation.
Just what magic is being used for them?
I don't believe you but feel free to push that.
I don't give a damn what you believe as you have shown you don't value the truth, will reject reality and believe delusional nonsense which is contradicted by so many experiments you can easily do.