To Find PHEW with Easy Way

Try this at home... it's MINDBLOWING 

If you believe in pi up to now, please don't cry. 

Hard to argue with that.

Hahaj ya i agree with winkle.
Was there some instruction missed?

Hard to argue with that.

You said Phew can cure low blood pressure. I hope also other illnesses. Even including poverty. 

Hahaj ya i agree with winkle.
Was there some instruction missed?

The instruction might be set for the advantage of pi.

"Winning by cheating is not the true winning" :')

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Of course manual method cannot represent the real, accurate measurement. But at least the measurement will point out to around 3.17.
The right calculation of Phew will reveal the accurate size of C/D.

Phew is based on 45° arc : radius equals 0.79279 : 1 which means the 1 loses 0.2071 part in order to form a curved line of a perfect circle.

45° curved length = sin45 + (1-cos45)²

Or the squared part is reversed:

45° curved length = (sin45)² + (1-cos45)

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

And as multiple people have said multiple times and you've IGNORED, they have measured it and found PHEW WRONG and Pi correct.

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Maybe that's your problem. If the tape is not flexible, you cannot measure C.

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Maybe that's your problem. If the tape is not flexible, you cannot measure C.

And his picture does not show a cylinder but a cup which has a varying diameter. Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

And his picture does not show a cylinder but a cup which has a varying diameter. Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

How can you assert it is a cup?
You have no idea if the bottom of the cylinder is closed.

Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Maybe that's your problem. If the tape is not flexible, you cannot measure C.

Hes ESL.
I assume he means stretchy.
But then again...

Quote from: frenat on November 30, 2018, 10:41:16 AM

And his picture does not show a cylinder but a cup which has a varying diameter. Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

How can you assert it is a cup?
You have no idea if the bottom of the cylinder is closed.

Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

It is an automobile cylinder liner, therefore fairly tightly toleranced.

And not closed.

I'd say incompetence.

Quote from: Curiouser and Curiouser on November 30, 2018, 10:13:35 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Maybe that's your problem. If the tape is not flexible, you cannot measure C.

Hes ESL.
I assume he means stretchy.
But then again...

Not my problem. If he wants to be stupid in his native language, I won't make fun of him.

Quote from: Bullwinkle on November 30, 2018, 10:49:04 AM

Quote from: frenat on November 30, 2018, 10:41:16 AM

And his picture does not show a cylinder but a cup which has a varying diameter. Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

How can you assert it is a cup?
You have no idea if the bottom of the cylinder is closed.

Intentional deception, incompetence, or both?

It is an automobile cylinder liner, therefore fairly tightly toleranced.

I stand corrected. Appeared to be a metal cup.

And not closed.

I'd say incompetence.

I agree.

Dear pi heads...

The pic is just for an illustration. I found it by googling.

Why were you so serious about the pic? (Which actually has no problem) 

Please exodus to Phew 

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Sure. 3.17 +/- a few percent. I agree to that.

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Many people here and around the world HAVE done it. They do NOT get around 3.17.  They get pi or close to pi.

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 02:26:55 PM

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Many people here and around the world HAVE done it. They do NOT get around 3.17.  They get pi or close to pi.

They're not honest OR they prebelieve school's 'theory' and ajust their experiments to an assumption.
By experiment, pi = 3.14 is far from reality.

In cone, pyramid volume experiments etc. also show the same case: dishonesty. :')

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 02:26:55 PM

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Sure. 3.17 +/- a few percent. I agree to that.

Not "3.14 +/- a few percent" 

Quote from: frenat on November 30, 2018, 03:11:55 PM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 02:26:55 PM

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Many people here and around the world HAVE done it. They do NOT get around 3.17.  They get pi or close to pi.

They're not honest OR they prebelieve school's 'theory' and ajust their experiments to an assumption.
By experiment, pi = 3.14 is far from reality.

In cone, pyramid volume experiments etc. also show the same case: dishonesty. :')

So now everybody but you is a liar.    not likely.

Quote from: frenat on November 30, 2018, 03:11:55 PM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 02:26:55 PM

Quote from: Lamaface on November 30, 2018, 08:12:54 AM

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 04:51:46 AM

Quote from: Psychomech on November 30, 2018, 04:40:18 AM

Can you please explain what you are trying to prove in your OP.
There is no information there.

By using (non flexible) tape and cylinder, you can find the real C/D, AKA Phew equals 3.17157

Please provide actual test results. It’s easy to find a cylinder and some tape.

It's universal stuff. Anyone can DIY. The result shall be around 3.17 for everyone.

Many people here and around the world HAVE done it. They do NOT get around 3.17.  They get pi or close to pi.

They're not honest OR they prebelieve school's 'theory' and ajust their experiments to an assumption.
By experiment, pi = 3.14 is far from reality.

In cone, pyramid volume experiments etc. also show the same case: dishonesty. :')

Once again you're calling me a liar. 

That's ok.  Everyone here knows the truth.  Everyone but you that is...or you're really just a troll.

Try this at home... it's MINDBLOWING 

If you believe in pi up to now, please don't cry. 

So Phew = one pair of scissors cutting one red ribbon.

I think I'll stick to = 3.14159265358979 approximately - well, that's all I can remember.

<< Oops >>

Rabinoz says : "I think I'll stick to  = 3.14159265358979 approximately"

>> Oh yeah? One method of pi: When calculating pi by composing little angled areas, there are a lot of "tiny umbrella areas" that are abandoned. So this means, the circle area MUST be MORE than PI.

Take back those tiny umbrellas and put those into calculation, and you'll get an area of PHEW :')

Rabinoz says : "I think I'll stick to  = 3.14159265358979 approximately"

>> Oh yeah? One method of pi: When calculating pi by composing little angled areas, there are a lot of "tiny umbrella areas" that are abandoned. So this means, the circle area MUST be MORE than PI.

Take back those tiny umbrellas and put those into calculation, and you'll get an area of PHEW :')

do you really not understand it or are you just trolling? As the number of those little angled areas approach infinity, the area of the lot of "tiny umbrella areas" approach zero and the result is pi. So NOTHING is abandoned.
 But that is only ONE method of calculating pi. EVERY method including direct measurement equals pi and NONE come close to your mythical made up nonsense of "phew".

Rabinoz says : "I think I'll stick to  = 3.14159265358979 approximately"

>> Oh yeah? One method of pi: When calculating pi by composing little angled areas, there are a lot of "tiny umbrella areas" that are abandoned. So this means, the circle area MUST be MORE than PI.

That depends entirely on the method used. Read the method used by Archimedes in Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi
He used this method starting with a square and n = 4 and doubled n each time.With Archimedes' method we know that (inner polygon perimeter) < π < (outer polygon perimeter)

After a lot of work for:
       n =   32 then  3.136548 < π < 3.15172 or 3.14414 and
       n = 128 then  3.141277 < π < 3.14222 or 3.14175 already far better than smelly Phew!
Now Archimedes did not have a calculator or trigonometric tables but he devised a method than did not need them so read the reference.
Read that references to see how you too can toss Phew into the

Take back those tiny umbrellas and put those into calculation, and you'll get an area of PHEW :')

Keep you silly little umbrellas and your smelly Phew and I'll use sweetly scented π.

Quote from: Danang on November 30, 2018, 06:57:00 PM

Rabinoz says : "I think I'll stick to  = 3.14159265358979 approximately"

>> Oh yeah? One method of pi: When calculating pi by composing little angled areas, there are a lot of "tiny umbrella areas" that are abandoned. So this means, the circle area MUST be MORE than PI.

Take back those tiny umbrellas and put those into calculation, and you'll get an area of PHEW :')

do you really not understand it or are you just trolling? As the number of those little angled areas approach infinity, the area of the lot of "tiny umbrella areas" approach zero and the result is pi. So NOTHING is abandoned.
 But that is only ONE method of calculating pi. EVERY method including direct measurement equals pi and NONE come close to your mythical made up nonsense of "phew".

He has to be trolling.  Otherwise he would use real measurements instead of trying to calculate his way along.  He's been given irrefutable proof but he just ignores it.  Maybe Danang is Heiwa's alt.