ho ho ho

  • 23 Replies
  • 3207 Views
?

Paradox

  • 167
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« on: January 11, 2007, 11:19:07 AM »
Send me a picture, picture, picture. I have read posts claiming to these pictures,  and seen some very badly drawn diagrams of a planet void of physical law or common sence.

     .Prove that there is a conspiracy of thousands of people who make fake pictures and films all day.

     .Give me a suitable reason for this pathetic conspiracy

     .Give me some good solid evidence that the earth is flat

     .Show me the ice wall and then get some photos looking over the edge.

     .Do Not! under any circumstances try to use the bible or the idea of guards. What are they going to shoot you if you go near.

     .Get a brain

     [email protected]
"keyboard not detected. Press any key to continue"

?

Banjooie

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: ho ho ho
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2007, 11:26:34 AM »
Quote from: "vdp"
    .Prove that there is a conspiracy of thousands of people who make fake pictures and films all day.
     .Give me a suitable reason for this pathetic conspiracy
     .Give me some good solid evidence that the earth is flat
     .Show me the ice wall and then get some photos looking over the edge.
     .Do Not! under any circumstances try to use the bible or the idea of guards. What are they going to shoot you if you go near.
    .Get a brain

Speaking as a firm round earth supporter, you're a frigging moron.

1: There are people who doubt the moon landings, it's pretty much the same idea.
2: They don't really have that one, but...well, I guess there might be a few I can think of.
3: They've got a list of experiments somewhere or something, I saw that after being here 5 minutes.
4: One, the guards.
5: Two: Yes? They've explained how you do it with like 600 guys.
6: Really, despite the fact they're wrong, they've put more thought into this than a lot of people have into the earth being round.

?

Orsenfelt

  • 33
  • +0/-0
Re: ho ho ho
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2007, 11:42:15 AM »
Quote from: "Banjooie"
6: Really, despite the fact they're wrong, they've put more thought into this than a lot of people have into the earth being round.


Oh get real, there are holes all over it. Simple Physics itself de-bunks it never mind anything else. They also seem to forget that ROund Earth was proved hundreds of years ago.

This community is a small group of people who are clinging on to a lie, They have obviously been told lies as children and beleive everything else they are told is a lie. Its quite pointless argueing with them as they either skip round your question or have a completly ludacris answer for it.

The fact is that they have no evidence, up against Hundreds of years worth of endless pictures/video's/accounts/physics.

I have yet to see a single picture of this Ice Wall, Of the earth being flat (That wasn't taken 2ft above sea level) I have yet to see a journal, Names of people who guard the wall, People who know the conspiracy.. Nothing.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: ho ho ho
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2007, 11:47:21 AM »
Quote from: "Orsenfelt"

Oh get real, there are holes all over it. Simple Physics itself de-bunks it never mind anything else.

Such as?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Orsenfelt

  • 33
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2007, 11:51:23 AM »
Well if you think theres none, Give me some physics that proves FE.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2007, 11:52:02 AM »
Newton's three laws fit quite nicely.  As does Relativity.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Orsenfelt

  • 33
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2007, 11:53:28 AM »
Ok, Please explain to me how Newtons laws and Relativity prove FE.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 11:58:26 AM »
Quote from: "Orsenfelt"
Ok, Please explain to me how Newtons laws and Relativity prove FE.

I didn't say they did.  I said they fit nicely within the framework of the FE model.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3792
  • +0/-0
  • We are as one.
ho ho ho
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2007, 12:02:02 PM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Quote from: "Orsenfelt"
Ok, Please explain to me how Newtons laws and Relativity prove FE.

I didn't say they did.  I said they fit nicely within the framework of the FE model.


Then you admit to dodging his argument?

ho ho ho
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2007, 12:06:51 PM »
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there another discussion on this site about how people don't fall off the earth because if you travel to the edge some sort of dimensional magnetic field (or some such) transports you to the other side.  Well why would there be need for an ice wall then, wouldn't the water just do the same thing?

?

Tom Bishop

ho ho ho
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2007, 12:17:30 PM »
Quote from: "ExecutiveOdin"
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there another discussion on this site about how people don't fall off the earth because if you travel to the edge some sort of dimensional magnetic field (or some such) transports you to the other side.  Well why would there be need for an ice wall then, wouldn't the water just do the same thing?


There is an ice wall because people have reported seeing ice there when passing the Antarctic coastline.

ho ho ho
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2007, 12:19:29 PM »
Thats ALL you see when passing the antartic coastline.

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2007, 12:19:57 PM »
Right, so just because a few people with mixed opinions report seeing ice, that means that there is a 150 high ice wall surrounding a supposedly flat earth....

?

Paradox

  • 167
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2007, 12:20:02 PM »
The kind of delusional denial that the FEs are in, which is usually bought about by a lifetime of fundimentalist religion cannot be broken by fact, hence the conspiracy theoy.

 and a magnetic field of transportation. Seriously that is a new low for these FEs, it's a good thing I havent read that for myself because i might actually have died laughing.
"keyboard not detected. Press any key to continue"

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2007, 12:20:03 PM »
Quote from: "ExecutiveOdin"
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there another discussion on this site about how people don't fall off the earth because if you travel to the edge some sort of dimensional magnetic field (or some such) transports you to the other side.  

You are wrong.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2007, 12:22:08 PM »
Quote from: "BOGWarrior89"
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Quote from: "Orsenfelt"
Ok, Please explain to me how Newtons laws and Relativity prove FE.

I didn't say they did.  I said they fit nicely within the framework of the FE model.


Then you admit to dodging his argument?

No, I was making a statement.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Orsenfelt

  • 33
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2007, 12:24:37 PM »
Quote from: "TheEngineer"
Quote from: "ExecutiveOdin"
Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn't there another discussion on this site about how people don't fall off the earth because if you travel to the edge some sort of dimensional magnetic field (or some such) transports you to the other side.  

You are wrong.


He didn't ask you to tell him he was wrong, he asked you to CORRECT him if he was indeed wrong.

So we've established he was wrong, What is 'right'?

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #17 on: January 11, 2007, 12:25:55 PM »
There is no 'teleportation' device at the edge of the earth.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #18 on: January 11, 2007, 12:26:35 PM »
Engineer, you answer all posts but mine? I demand logical answers!!!!1111111!!!!!!!!!!!!

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #19 on: January 11, 2007, 12:33:40 PM »
Quote

Right, so just because a few people with mixed opinions report seeing ice, that means that there is a 150 high ice wall surrounding a supposedly flat earth....

I'm sure many people have seen mountains in 'antarctica'.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #20 on: January 11, 2007, 12:35:01 PM »
But of course, due to your logic, the gov't would stop them from telling about it.

Also, we're not taking opinions into this, so your assurances are null.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
ho ho ho
« Reply #21 on: January 11, 2007, 12:41:23 PM »
Quote from: "Kadover"

Also, we're not taking opinions into this, so your assurances are null.

Opinion?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Banjooie

  • 44
  • +0/-0
ho ho ho
« Reply #22 on: January 11, 2007, 01:10:57 PM »
Well, yeah, but...how do you know it's the ice wall, and not that there's...you know, an antarctica AND a wall?

?

GeoGuy

ho ho ho
« Reply #23 on: January 11, 2007, 01:43:45 PM »
Quote from: "vdp"
The kind of delusional denial that the FEs are in, which is usually bought about by a lifetime of fundimentalist religion cannot be broken by fact, hence the conspiracy theoy.

Every FE on this site is an atheist. Try learning a little bit about the theory before arguing it please.