Ahhhh every single satelite can reveal my personal belongings in the backyard.
Incorrect! Every single satelite
cannot reveal your personal belongings in the backyard!
The highest resolution weather satellite is the
Elektro-L No.1 Russian weather satellite and "the images have a
resolution of one kilometer per pixel"
There might be a few "spy satellites" with this sort of perfirmance:
It appears, the largest known spy satellite has a mirror about 2.4 meters in diameter (there's no coincidence this is the size of the Hubble and the size of the space shuttle cargo bay). Now at visual wave-lengths and at 250km, this gives a resolution of 0.05 meters, or about a few inches.
But the moment the Apollo artifacts are captured by a satelite orbiting the moon the resolution isn’t good enough, so we have to interpret some blurry pixels that present 10m each ( to small for a detailed rover)
The
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter does not have a mirror anything like 2.4 meters in diameter!
What is LROC (Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera)?
The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, or LROC, is a system of three cameras mounted on the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) that capture high resolution black and white images and moderate resolution multi-spectral images of the lunar surface.
LROC Narrow Angle Camera (NAC)
LROC consists of two Narrow Angle Cameras (NACs) that are designed to provide 0.5 meter-scale panchromatic images over a 5 km swath, and a Wide Angle Camera (WAC) that provides images at a scale of 100 meters/pixel in seven color bands over a 60 km swath. The Sequence and Compressor System (SCS) supports data acquisition for both cameras.
You might note (if you know what the words mean) that's its best resolution is
0.5 meter compared to
0.05 meter on the best spy satellites.
Hence the LROC gives photos like:
Apollo 11 landing site | |
Apollo 12 landing site | |
Apollo 14 landing site
|
Apollo 15 landing site | |
Apollo 16 landing site | |
Apollo 17 landing site |
But the magic jargon of the church of scientism can easily fix this idiocy.
No "magic jargon of the church of scientism" is needed, just facts - something that's never bothered you much.
Of course your adherence to the false teachings of "
the Church of neo-Flat Earthism" doesn't help!
And the believers think this is just the way it is....
Car in the street captured by a satelite ? Of course !!!
Apollo rover captured by a satelite Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter? Of course !!! but not in any detail whatsoever...to small, wrong orbit, wrong camera....
Why should NASA go to the expanse of a sending a telescope of that capability to the moon? You'd just ridicule the result as you do with everything else.
And if you ever prove the lunar missions a hoax,
dutchy, what have you proven about the shape of the earth
- a big fat nothing !Enjoy
!