And where is the evidence for the Dome? Where are the photographs of the dome . . . ?
I would say none but what would I know I'm just a poor deluded globularist.
But

smart flat-earthers

claim evidence like this:
Rocket hitting the flat earth dome,
1,424,043 views, GeoShifter | | Rocket slams into firmament: dome,
941,753 views, BHI1524 | | Must see 2 Rockets hit the dome on flat earth,
60,749 views, Christian Warner |
Where are the photographs of . . . infinite ice?
Neither I nor most flat-earthers claim infinite ice!
The TFES Wiki states:
The Ice Wall
The Ice Wall was discovered by Sir James Clark Ross, a British Naval Officer and polar explorer who was among the first to venture to Antarctica in an attempt to determine the position of the South Magnetic Pole. Upon confronting the massive vertical front of of ice he famously remarked:
It was ... an obstruction of such character as to leave no doubt in my mind as to our future proceedings, for we might as well sail through the cliffs of Dover as to penetrate such a mass.
It would be impossible to conceive a more solid-looking mass of ice; not the smallest appearance of any rent or fissure could we discover throughout its whole extent, and the intensely bright sky beyond it but too plainly indicated the great distance to which it reached southward.
—Sir James Clark Ross
 The Ice Wall surrounds 95% of the Antarctic coast |
But, while there are many ice-cliffs around Antarctica, I do not believe that access to Antarctica is blocked by an ice-wall.
Note that I have used the
TFES.org Wiki because it is in far better "shape" than this one.
Maybe you could become a member of
TFES.org. You might (

or might not

) find them more receptive.
What makes my theory of infinite ocean more unrealistic then other flat earth theories?
Not my problem! I believe that all flat earth
theories hypotheses (none deserve that description of a "theory") are totally unrealistic and impossible.
So, what I have been asking for all along has been evidence of your "
theory hypothesis of infinite ocean".
You claim you believe in round earth yet you also think some flat earth models are more rational then others.
Possibly a little more rational as flat-earthers claim "show me the curvature!" and aren't satisfied with the Globe explanations.
Probably the conventional flat earth hypothesis is the least irrational, but it's hard to just irrationality like that.
My model is much better then a fucking dome.
Really?
But that is totally irrelevant because, from what I can see, most flat-earthers here and at TFES.org (yes, I inhabit there too) don't believe in any dome anyway.
Some members claim that there is a dome and present the above videos but there does not seem to be any suggestion of any
dome in either the Wiki or the FAQ.
And no the people who left this forum did not convert to round earthers, they just got bored here.
That again is just your unsupported opinion!
I mean this is called flat earth society yet we have to deal with the likes of you every time.
Tough! If you post in the
Flat Earth General or
Flat Earth Debate forums that is what you will get because that is what those forums are for!
Flat Earth General
For the discussion of any FE topics unrelated to Flat Earth Theory. FE conspiracy topics belong here.
Flat Earth Debate
This board is reserved for debates on Flat Earth Theory. Please note that it is strictly moderated!
If you don't like what any particular person says you could just ignore them. But as the saying goes, "If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen!"
There is the forum for "believers":
Flat Earth Believers
A board for debate and discussion among Flat Earth Believers.
You could apply to become a
believer and these include,
jeranism, Marciano, Sir Richard, Tom Bishop, bullhorn, clovis2, AltSpace, sandokhan, wise, Secret User, 17-Nov, hoppy, Earthdude and
Raa.
And you wouldn't be bothered by pesky Globularists anymore.
There are more round earthers here now than ever before, they bash and destroy every thread.
You mean to ask you for awkward things like evidence, tough! The Globe has unlimited evidence supporting it.
If you expect anyone to accept your ideas then you must provide supporting evidence.
We already know you don't believe in flat earth, we get it. We know your science and your measurements and your physics, we went to your schools, I don't understand why you guys are allowed to come here. Its like a Christian posting on Muslim forums. Makes no sense.
Not quite. These forums are for debate between the flat earth and the Globe earth.
The earth is a huge physical object and any debates about its shape must be supported by physical evidence in form of, for example, photographs or various types of measurements.
If your ideas can't stand up to that yet then discuss them with other flat-earthers and try to garner support. So far you seem to have no support from any flat-earthers.
On the other hand, the
Christian vs
Muslim is a matter of faith and cannot be supported by a great deal of physical evidence.
Nevertheless, I imagine that there are forums where the
Christian vs
Muslim issue is discussed openly.