Werepenguins - The Perth Massacre

[I have to tell them who killed me!]

WOOOOOOOO wooooo woooo WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  wooo wooo wooooooooooo
wooooooooo
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

[OH no!  I'm a ghost, I know I'll try writing it in the dirt.  That they they'll just have to read that it says]

woooooooooooooooooooo woooo wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowoooooo

[noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo]

I HOPE I STUCK ENOUGH S'MORES TO YOUR BODY TO SUSTAIN YOU IN THE AFTERLIFE!!!

Everyone name their top suspect, along with why they're a suspect. Emphasis on the why, we can't afford to be distracted from the reasons we are suspicious.

You all know mine I expect. Roundy, for being on both the wrong votes, spearheading the charge in the former case, being unnaturally defensive when accused, and using Ichi's death for his own benefit.

Does anyone have alternate suspects with reason, or reasons to disagree with either mine or anyone else's suspicions?

My top suspect is Jane, obviously, for trying to subtly control the game in pretty much the same way she did last game
...as his primary accuser she is the one who really benefited from his death, because she thinks she can play you all for fools.

I hope we can talk it all out and I can convince you not to lynch me, or you can come to the conclusion that I'm innocent on your own. If you look at Jane's claims about my guilt you can see how flimsy they are. It's ridiculous to assert that I tried to benefit from Ichi's death, for example, and as I already explained as his primary accuser she is the one who really benefited from his death, because she thinks she can play you all for fools.

Yes I'm being defensive, I don't fucking care. This notion that defensiveness is a sign of guilt is pure bullshit Jane thinks you're all stupid enough to fall for too. Are you? Look back at the last game. People get defensive when they feel like their heads are on the chopping block, guilty or not.

Please believe me, I am not a werepenguin. But I strongly suspect Jane is.

I think if you examine what Jane is saying about me it's weak. She's been gunning for me the whole game because she thinks I've made myself an easy target. I've laid out all the ways she's acting suspicious.

So whatever, if you do end up lynching me, once you've seen I'm innocent, please recognize how guilty it makes Jane look and lynch her next. At this point that's all I'm asking.

Instead of just saying it's 'flimsy,' tell me I'm wrong. Tell me how I benefit from someone I accused being eaten rather than lynched. Tell me how anyone does, except for the one person that did try to get a win from it.
...
You accuse me of manipulating votes when that's how you post? I'm giving my reasons, I'm giving logic. You're giving "She thinks you're stupid!" "She's playing you for fools!" Which one of us is manipulative again?

Also, side note, but the tactics Roundy's ascribing to me are nonsense. I'm targetting him because he's suspicious, and I'm not forgetting his suspicious behaviour. I'm intentionally driving it, well aware that if I'm wrong I'm due to get lynched after. That is a bad tactic to suppose. Speaking from experience, that isn't how penguins operate, penguins just encourage the suspicions you already have. They get you to lynch the wrong people, and get the excuse of not being the only one fooled. And that's what he's basing his suspicion of me on; the fact I accused him, despite the fact it would make no sense for someone who was a penguin to do so.

Quote from: Jane on August 01, 2018, 06:36:29 AM

Also, side note, but the tactics Roundy's ascribing to me are nonsense. I'm targetting him because he's suspicious, and I'm not forgetting his suspicious behaviour. I'm intentionally driving it, well aware that if I'm wrong I'm due to get lynched after. That is a bad tactic to suppose. Speaking from experience, that isn't how penguins operate, penguins just encourage the suspicions you already have. They get you to lynch the wrong people, and get the excuse of not being the only one fooled. And that's what he's basing his suspicion of me on; the fact I accused him, despite the fact it would make no sense for someone who was a penguin to do so.

Does anybody not see how nakedly she's setting up her case after I'm lynched not to be lynched herself? Just because she says she's not being manipulative doesn't mean she's not being manipulative.  Please don't fall for it!