Alright, that's actually just stupid. Bullhorn, I'm going to take a page out of Lykos's book and dissect your disgustingly inadequate answers one by one, and explain to you why they aren't answers at all, or why they are woefully wrong.
Question: Why are there time zones? Why is it that some areas experience night time while some experience day time?
Answer: I don’t know why there are time zones, that was created my man, as to the question of why there is day and night. That question, I will have to more research in depth. One could assume that they were created to help business.
Alright, while this is a valid answer as to why there are timezones, you're actually just avoiding the actualy question which is: Why does the sun to be in different positions depending on where you are on the planet, and why do all these places experience the same perception of the spatial positioning of the sun and different times?
Question: Why is it that as you move away from a tall structure its top disappears first?
Answer: I assume it has to do with the same principal when you move away from an object it gets smaller
Firstly, you can't tell me what you assume, because I can tell you I
know it's because the earth is round. And the principal by which an object gets smaller as you move away from it is called
distance, Bullhorn,
spatial awareness, that's why they get smaller. It has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with why as you move away from a tall structure its top disappears first.
Question: Why is it that when you look out into the ocean the horizon appears curved?
Answer: I assume it has to do with the refraction of the water
Sadly, this is actually you most sensible answer, but still false, the principal of water refraction is just that, water refracts light, it doesn't bend it, at least not when it's reflected back from the water, and in any case, the water level of the ocean is level, even according to your ridiculous flat-earth theory, and so all the water would refract the light evenly, so there would be no curve. So we see that simply by your own logic you are proven false.
Question: Why is it not possible to see the Washington Monument from the top of the Empire State Building with binoculars
Answer: The answer would be atmosphere dust and fog similar to a foggy day
No. Just no. See then your vision would simply stop, and you'd see an opaque substance, like you do on a foggy day. You know that grey stuff you see? It's fog. But that's not what you see when you stand on the empire state building, you see a horizon, where the land meet the sky.
Question: I see satellites up in the sky at night. How would they be able to orbit a flat Earth?
Answer: How do you know they are satellites?
Actually, this is a fairly valid point, but all you're doing is answering a question with another question. But I get your meaning, I can't prove that there are satelites orbiting our earth. However, I'm going to then ask you what those things I see flying through the sky at nigt are. Note that you also have to explain why they would pass through the same path every night at the same time, and why they flash rythmically. And don't you dare say aliens, because every world government has publically denied the existance of aliens, and your entire theory hinges on world governments being able to cover virtually everything up without any problems.
You see these answers can all be explained by Occams razor. They are the most simple explanations to the problems.
No, no they can't and they aren't, and as I poimted out earlier, this is an
overapplication of Ockham's Razor, as it doesn't fulfilled the criteria for Ockham's Razor to be apllied. Which was actually the point I was trying to make in the first place, that you overapplied Ockham's razor in another discussion, so your point was invalid. But apparently that went way over your head.
There, are you happy now? I've rendered all of you "answers" invalid, if you can't disprove these, or fail to, you are actually wrong, and can just shut the hell up, because if you can't explain these phenomena in terms that would make sense in a flat earth, a flat earth cannot exist, as these phenomena do occur.