The Sun circling Arctic Area? It's a HOAX

Still waiting for the **real** timelapse video of 24 hours sun encircling Arctic Circle by CW.

 

There are dozens of real time lapse videos but you just don't believe any of them.

The only way you'll believe it is to take the trip and see it for yourself.

Mike

No chicken video please, I want a beef video ~

Still waiting for the **real** timelapse video of 24 hours sun encircling Arctic Circle by CW.

How can you tell the difference between a **real** time lapse and a **fake** tame lapse?

BTW, such a time lapse would be perfectly compatible with FET.  However, a 24 hour time lapse of the Antarctic midnight sun might be a different story.

Quote from: Danang on April 29, 2018, 08:04:09 PM

Still waiting for the **real** timelapse video of 24 hours sun encircling Arctic Circle by CW.

How can you tell the difference between a **real** time lapse and a **fake** tame lapse?

BTW, such a time lapse would be perfectly compatible with FET.  However, a 24 hour time lapse of the Antarctic midnight sun might be a different story.

The real 24 hours of Arctic midnight sun timelapse video is something giving the solution for this dispute. I am ready to accept if such video really exists.

Some months ago somebody gave link of the only such video, but it showed the wrong shadow. The sun is appearing, but the shadow is getting longer. Impossible.

AE FEers needs to clarify it with such video. Globers are un-trustworthy.. Oops!

No one can make you accept it, either you do or you don't. 
Stupidity is no longer a thing I wish to correct. 

Quote from: markjo on April 30, 2018, 12:53:05 PM

Quote from: Danang on April 29, 2018, 08:04:09 PM

Still waiting for the **real** timelapse video of 24 hours sun encircling Arctic Circle by CW.

How can you tell the difference between a **real** time lapse and a **fake** tame lapse?

BTW, such a time lapse would be perfectly compatible with FET.  However, a 24 hour time lapse of the Antarctic midnight sun might be a different story.

The real 24 hours of Arctic midnight sun timelapse video is something giving the solution for this dispute. I am ready to accept if such video really exists.

How about a video that shows that the Arctic midnight sun actually proves that the earth is flat and unmoving?

No one can make you accept it, either you do or you don't. 
Stupidity is no longer a thing I wish to correct.

Some helpful advice for those tempted to argue with an idiot, or even a pretend idiot:

“Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.” ― Mark Twain

How to argue with an idiot Don't

Arguing with an idiot can be time consuming and mentally draining. Arguing with an idiot is a lot like a saying my dad used to tell me, "Never wrestle with a pig, you'll both get dirty and the pig will enjoy it." In other words, don't argue with an idiot, you both look stupid and the idiot enjoys it!” ― Possibly George Bernard Shaw

The real 24 hours of Arctic midnight sun timelapse video is something giving the solution for this dispute. I am ready to accept if such video really exists.

Don't lie.
You were provided several and rejected with no basis.

Some months ago somebody gave link of the only such video, but it showed the wrong shadow. The sun is appearing, but the shadow is getting longer. Impossible.

There was nothing wrong with the shadow.
if you think there is such a video, provide it and explain exactly where the problem was.

Globers are un-trustworthy.. Oops!

So far you have only shown yourself to be untrustworthy, with your repeated lies and nonsense.

No chicken video please, I want a beef video ~

Take the video yourself.  You can post it here and prove everyone wrong.  Until that there are dozens of videos that prove you wrong and you have no leg to stand on.

Mike

1:20 the shadow is wrong.
Just one example 

When I posted "globers are un-trustworthy" I didn't thinking any names in my mind.

For some globers that were 'inspired' by my post, thank you... I'm flattered 

1:20 the shadow is wrong.
Just one example 

Wrong how?  Looks fine to me.

Are you sure frenat?
When the sun is getting nearer why is the shadow growing longer?

Also the mountain's shadow is supposed not that sharp.

Also the sea waving is too slow for the sun's movement. That's not a real timelapse.

Are you sure frenat?
When the sun is getting nearer why is the shadow growing longer?

Also the mountain's shadow is supposed not that sharp.

Also the sea waving is too slow for the sun's movement. That's not a real timelapse.

the shadow length is affected more by the surface it is projected onto than anything else. 
why shouldn't the shadow be that sharp?  It is the top of the mountain's shadow onto the the mountain just beneath it.  Not much distance there.

I see no waves in the sea.  Only some ice moving.

Still no problems.

When the sun is getting nearer why is the shadow growing longer?

You mean, when the sun appears nearer to the horizon? Because then the sun is farther away.
Or do you mean, when the sun is nearer to the camera (and therefore higher in the sky)? Then the shadows are shorter. At what time position do they appear longer to you?

Also the mountain's shadow is supposed not that sharp.

Yes, that is normal with a nearly cloudless sky, especially when it is cold and the atmosphere is clear. And also keep in mind, that the camera is at some distance to the shadows. It is over 500 m above sea level. Therefore, the mountains in the background casting the shadows are a few kilometers away. Also the shadows area at some distance. Therefore, you won't see much penumbra.

Also the sea waving is too slow for the sun's movement. That's not a real timelapse.

The water is very still in the bay. It could be almost standing waves. But you could see the ice growing and melting on the water.

1:20 the shadow is wrong.
Just one example 

Nope. Just one baseless claim.
Explain exactly what is wrong with the shadow.

When the sun is getting nearer why is the shadow growing longer?

On what basis are you claiming the sun is getting nearer?
As for why it grows longer, have you considered the ground it is on.
That is like asking why the entire back of a building is in shade.

Also the mountain's shadow is supposed not that sharp.

Says who?

Also the sea waving is too slow for the sun's movement. That's not a real timelapse.

You mean the sea is calm.
That doesn't magically mean it is fake.

@Badxtoss
Mexico is situated on sun path at summer solstice.
You cannot reach Mexico by following "CW midnight sun" which is nonsense.
Again: the best example is: Northernmost Europe to northernmost Canada.
"Theoritically" you're supposed to go north but that's by reality impossible. No pilot did that.

What point are you trying to prove?

SHOW ME 24 HOURS MIDNIGHT SUN REAL TIMELAPSE.

Is it just me?   

Quote from: Danang on April 28, 2018, 08:00:58 PM

SHOW ME 24 HOURS MIDNIGHT SUN REAL TIMELAPSE.

Is it just me?   

After "Ladies First", nowadays there should be "Danang First". :')

Sun path diagram says: on northern America, when equinox comes, the sun rises from "the east and set at the east". At summer solstice: it rises at north east and sets at north west.

Are you sure? That's more or less the reality at equator!

Sun path diagram says: on northern America, when equinox comes, the sun rises from "the east and set at the east". At summer solstice: it rises at north east and sets at north west.

Are you sure? That's more or less the reality at equator!

No that is the reality for basically everyone, except it sets at the west.
In the northern summer, the sun rises north of east and sets north of west, and that applies everywhere the sun sets.