Explain gravity

if the Flat earth theory is true how would gravity work?   
p.s im a Round Earther

Simple. Things fall down. Easy to prove, and you have seen it yourself.

No need for gravity.

what stops the eath from falling

Where would it fall? We are king. The rest of the stuff revolves around us.

Evidence plz

+what makes the "stuff" revolve around us.

if the Flat earth theory is true how would gravity work?   
p.s im a Round Earther

Same with something shrinks in the water. If its specific weight more than air, falls. Human generally doesn't shrinks the water because a bit lighter than the water. Helium goes up because lighter than the air. What was the gravity, who does need it?

On the other hand, gravity based free falling accelerate doesn't work after 10 secs  of free falling!

And this explains:

Evidence plz

Ever tried dropping something? It falls down. Quite an easy experiment.

+what makes the "stuff" revolve around us.

I believe that would be the firmament.

I made a calculation depends on a free falling high altitude ballon when burst and start to free falling.

After 10 seconds of free falling, it starts a stable speed with zero accelerate. You may find that examination in my advanced working in the alt forum of flat earth believers.

Here it is:

ADVANCED PHYSICS OF THE FLAT EARTH THEORY 3

Calculating the gravity G constant and disproving the gravity:

We'll use for it a burst of weather ballon. This is our source of the video, as a proof.



In 1:57, balloon starts to burst. After that, with a bit air resistance, we may agree the object as free falling.

Lets notice the time-altitude values:

Before corrections:

Time from 0 (will be corrected from 1:57) / altitude as feets (will be corrected as meters)
1:57 112.466

2:07 110535

2:17 108659

2:27 106802

2:37 104933

2:47 103020


There was some advertisements on the video. But I chosed it for trust it better than a free video. Because there may be legal problems with no-advertising videos. I hope there is probably no legal problem with that.

Lets start to calculate:

Time  (x-1:57) as seconds / Distance (112.466-y) as feets

0- 0
10- 1931
20- 3807
30- 5664
40- 7533
50- 9446

Time gap / distance gap
0-0
10-1931
10-1876
10-1857
10-1869
10-1913

Time gap (seconds) /distance gap (converted to meters)
0-0
10 secs -588 mt
10 secs- 571 mt
10 secs- 566 mt
10 secs- 570 mt
10 secs- 583 mt

Where is accelerate? There is no accelerate after 10 seconds.

If we calculate the average top speed we find a value as 57,6 m/sn. This is the stable speed of this falling object. There is no more accelerate after 10 seconds.

We'll continue to examine the free falling objects.

That’s not a constant, it is based around Terminal velocity which occurs when the air drag becomes equal to the force of gravity   

For example, an American penny will reach terminal velocity after falling 15 metres

p.s these results only apply if dropped in the troposphere, if it is dropped higher up the results will change. This is because of less air pressure which will equal less air drag.   

I am angered by your remarks. The earth is flat, and so you are wrong! Trump is my life!

i understand you are salty. but im just here to have a debate.

Prove the existance of terminal velocity by scientifically. You can't object against a scientific, phsical experiment while you depend on an imaginary term. If you can, but your objection is not valid.

I could easily conduct one, and it’s been done 100’s of times before. Just look at the experiment they did on the moon with little air pressure. On earth a hammer would drop faster than a feather, whereas on the moon they both fall at the same speed.         

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 03:36:13 AM

if the Flat earth theory is true how would gravity work?   
p.s im a Round Earther

Same with something shrinks in the water. If its specific weight more than air, falls.

But what makes it fall? Specific weight does not make anything fall.
Why don't people and objects fall in a zero gravity plane? In the plane they have exactly the same density as on the ground, so why do they float?

Human generally doesn't shrinks the water because a bit lighter than the water. Helium goes up because lighter than the air. What was the gravity, who does need it?

You ask, "Who needs it?" Well, brotherhood of the dome, you need something to explain why dense objects fall down and do not "fall" up.

On the other hand, gravity based free falling accelerate doesn't work after 10 secs  of free falling!

That is simply becasue the increasing air resistance means that the falling object reaches a "terminal velocity".
A very low density high drag object like a feather might reach this terminal velocity in less than a second whil very demse low drag objects will take much longer.

And this explains:

No, it explains nothing! Try again.

look it's some one smart.

I could easily conduct one, and it’s been done 100’s of times before. Just look at the experiment they did on the moon with little air pressure. On earth a hammer would drop faster than a feather, whereas on the moon they both fall at the same speed.         

Don't come me with the lie of moon hoax. Talk about realities. If you done more than 100, so can do it only one in here, true? Why do you wait for? Do you wait for me agree your moon hoax first? Nah! This will never be done. I show you a real time experiment. Show me anything like this proves the velocity limit.

look it's some one smart.

Idiotinoz is in the ignored list an idiot one, well known here. I don't take him serious, I don't take him an adress. Your considering him as a smart one proves your IQ equal or less than him. This is a negative point for you.

I define him as most idiot one here. And you define him as smart. So you agree yourself as the new most idiot one here. This is a type of resign the discussing. This is a type of agreeing yourself a loser by yourself. On the other hand, this may makes you an alt of him. Because only idiotinoz can be idiot to think to use an alt and say himself smart by the other alt membership.

I had a feeling that you would go for the moon-hoax argument, if you want to recreate the “moon experiment” all you need is a vacuum sealed environment. Drop the feather and the hammer and they will fall at the same time and speed.
evidence-
p.s  I never said I did the experiment. I said I could do. And that it’s been done a 100’s time before               

I had a feeling that you would go for the moon-hoax argument, if you want to recreate the “moon experiment” all you need is a vacuum sealed environment. Drop the feather and the hammer and they will fall at the same time.
evidence-          

It has been already exposed:

Hello guys,

We are together again with debunking a fucking lie of graviters.

There is a video comparing two objects which one of them heavy and other one is light. One of them is a ball and second one is a down. First they are compered with free falling and ball falled first. They connect it to "air friction". The second test in no air vacuum and they fallen with same time. Is it really? No. We'll learn in another topic that obcejts falling time connected with their weights and gravity is a lie. But first, we should to debunk this fucking experiment.

Lets watch now.



Everything seems like okey ha? Gravity is proven. Is it really? Take a look more carefully.

Come to: 4:16 Catch that picture:



Objects start about same point.

Come to finish line, 4:30



The distances of them aren't changed in fallen time. So they moved together. And this situation proves the gravity. Is it real? No. Come back to 4:14 and move the video slowly again.

Now come to: 4:16 and catch this image:



Where is ball?

Ball is faster and made significant difference in only 1st second.

So the difference of them must increase according to The usual continuation of their movements.

But falls in same time:



Fake. Debunked. I don't accept appeals because everything is clear.



So this man, Brian Cox is a liar, a dishonest, dishonored one !

Proffssor ha professor! Professor of being a son of whore !

PS. Before "real time experiment", there is some "slow motion showings before it but they are all fake and cartoon. Only the experiment in 4:16-4:30 is real time experiment and we proven it is fake. Added to my working sector .

This fake experiment proves how graviters are dishonest, dishonored ones!

Do you have any other lie?

PS: Photos are deleted but I can reupload them in 10 minutes. The so called experiment of Brian Cox is debunked without any doubt!

Idiotinoz is in the ignored list an idiot one, well known here. I don't take him serious, I don't take him an adress. Your considering him as a smart one proves your IQ equal or less than him. This is a negative point for you.

I define him as most idiot one here. And you define him as smart. So you agree yourself as the new most idiot one here. This is a type of resign the discussing. This is a type of agreeing yourself a loser by yourself. On the other hand, this may makes you an alt of him. Because only idiotinoz can be idiot to think to use an alt and say himself smart by the other alt membership.

You just cannot admit you are wrong, so you ignore everyone who proves you wrong!

To be called "most idiot one here" by the Brotherhood of the Deceivers is honour indeed. Thank you, oh exalted one!

sheepinoz is in the ignore list and I don't see his rubbish posts.

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 05:50:33 AM

I had a feeling that you would go for the moon-hoax argument, if you want to recreate the “moon experiment” all you need is a vacuum sealed environment. Drop the feather and the hammer and they will fall at the same time.
evidence-          

It has been already exposed:

Incorrect! You are deceiving us again Mr Brotherhood of the Deceivers! All objects fall at the same rate in a vacuum!

the problem with the internet is that you can always find at least 1 article to prove YOUR POINT, but this is going against 1000's of other ones that prove this is true

I have upgraded the images in the post of debunking the fraud:

Hello guys,

We are together again with debunking a fucking lie of graviters.

There is a video comparing two objects which one of them heavy and other one is light. One of them is a ball and second one is a down. First they are compered with free falling and ball falled first. They connect it to "air friction". The second test in no air vacuum and they fallen with same time. Is it really? No. We'll learn in another topic that obcejts falling time connected with their weights and gravity is a lie. But first, we should to debunk this fucking experiment.

Lets watch now.



Everything seems like okey ha? Gravity is proven. Is it really? Take a look more carefully.

Come to: 4:16 Catch that picture:



Objects start about same point.

Come to finish line, 4:30



The distances of them aren't changed in fallen time. So they moved together. And this situation proves the gravity. Is it real? No. Come back to 4:14 and move the video slowly again.

Now come to: 4:16 and catch this image:



Where is ball?

Ball is faster and made significant difference in only 1st second.

So the difference of them must increase according to The usual continuation of their movements.

But falls in same time:



Fake. Debunked. I don't accept appeals because everything is clear.

So this man, Brian Cox is a liar, a dishonest, dishonored one !

Proffssor ha professor! Professor of being a son of whore !

PS. Before "real time experiment", there is some "slow motion showings before it but they are all fake and cartoon. Only the experiment in 4:16-4:30 is real time experiment and we proven it is fake. Added to my working sector .

This fake experiment proves how graviters are dishonest, dishonored ones!

Do not use these dishonest clowns again!

have you done the experiment for your self

the problem with the internet is that you can always find at least 1 article to prove YOUR POINT, but this is going against 1000's of other ones that prove this is true

True is one.

Tell me, does logic requires of this experiment fake or not?

They start together:



In 1st second ball makes a significant difference:



So what it should be? The ball must down first. But they downs together.



This is phsically impossible, logically impossible, theorically impossible, scientifically: IMPOSSIBLE! This is proven as scientifically, logically and phsically. To agree this as a scientifix experiment proves someone as brainless or idiot. This is the reason of why I define rabinoz as brainlessinoz.

I recommend you, do not be like idiotinoz, be smart!

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 05:23:54 AM

I could easily conduct one, and it’s been done 100’s of times before. Just look at the experiment they did on the moon with little air pressure. On earth a hammer would drop faster than a feather, whereas on the moon they both fall at the same speed.         

Don't come me with the lie of moon hoax. Talk about realities. If you done more than 100, so can do it only one in here, true? Why do you wait for? Do you wait for me agree your moon hoax first? Nah! This will never be done. I show you a real time experiment. Show me anything like this proves the velocity limit.

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 05:32:13 AM

look it's some one smart.

Idiotinoz is in the ignored list an idiot one, well known here. I don't take him serious, I don't take him an adress. Your considering him as a smart one proves your IQ equal or less than him. This is a negative point for you.

I define him as most idiot one here. And you define him as smart. So you agree yourself as the new most idiot one here. This is a type of resign the discussing. This is a type of agreeing yourself a loser by yourself. On the other hand, this may makes you an alt of him. Because only idiotinoz can be idiot to think to use an alt and say himself smart by the other alt membership.

Interesting how your English quality changes from post to post.  Almost as if you are starting with good English and running it through a translator multiple times to make it appear worse.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on April 26, 2018, 05:46:14 AM

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 05:23:54 AM

I could easily conduct one, and it’s been done 100’s of times before. Just look at the experiment they did on the moon with little air pressure. On earth a hammer would drop faster than a feather, whereas on the moon they both fall at the same speed.         

Don't come me with the lie of moon hoax. Talk about realities. If you done more than 100, so can do it only one in here, true? Why do you wait for? Do you wait for me agree your moon hoax first? Nah! This will never be done. I show you a real time experiment. Show me anything like this proves the velocity limit.

Quote from: diskworld on April 26, 2018, 05:32:13 AM

look it's some one smart.

Idiotinoz is in the ignored list an idiot one, well known here. I don't take him serious, I don't take him an adress. Your considering him as a smart one proves your IQ equal or less than him. This is a negative point for you.

I define him as most idiot one here. And you define him as smart. So you agree yourself as the new most idiot one here. This is a type of resign the discussing. This is a type of agreeing yourself a loser by yourself. On the other hand, this may makes you an alt of him. Because only idiotinoz can be idiot to think to use an alt and say himself smart by the other alt membership.

Interesting how your English quality changes from post to post.  Almost as if you are starting with good English and running it through a translator multiple times to make it appear worse.

there are two different situations such as the question coming from where you know the exam and the question coming from where you do not know. You got it?