RIP Stephen Hawking

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 12:49:23 AM

Quote from: Rayzor on March 15, 2018, 12:45:44 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 12:37:47 AM

RIP stephan hawking the creator of free energy, oops wrong person. Oh the creator of water powered cars Oops wrong person that was Stan Meyer he was killed. Oh the guy who cured cancer and aids. Oops wrong person again that was Dr Sebi he was killed. Oh the person discovered flying cars Oops wrong person one more time. So wtf did he do for humanity. Not a damn thing, except some theories and support to the global killers.

Do you accept that other people might not agree with you?

To agree or do not agree with me is the problem of other people. The fact isn't change.

One of the defining characteristics of people with high IQ is the ability to absorb and process new information and change ideas to accomodate the new information,  this means that you sometimes have to admit that you are wrong,  inability to admit when you are mistaken is a sign of ignorance not high intelligence,  Heiwa can't admit when he is wrong.  I think you can.

Quote from: Heiwa on March 14, 2018, 10:34:39 PM

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. <snip>

There it is.  Yet another lie.  You stated that at the time you were badly brain damaged.  So how could you have an IQ of 200 and be "very badly brain damaged".  Let us see how you explain this in your own words.

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 04:18:18 AM

<snip> Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small - navy, sea mines, taught to kill people - but I cured myself.  http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

Quote from: MicroBeta on July 23, 2017, 05:26:54 AM

You cured yourself of brain damage?

Yes! And I explain how at http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself.

I think I am fairly well cured today. But it took a lot of time.

So, you not only claimed you were "very badly brain damaged" from when you were small but in ≈2003 you cured yourself.

Then you claimed you were tested in 1964 and had an IQ of 200.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 31, 2017, 12:55:37 AM

I remember being IQ tested 1964 for military duty! My IQ was then 200, which must have surprised the authorities. How on earth could I be so smart?  Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand. Guess how!

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2018, 05:43:55 AM

My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me. She didn't want me digging holes in the ground before becoming canon mince meat. The military authorities were impressed. I was 1/10 000 000 scoring it. Happened only once in 50 years.
 

Let’s recap your own words shall we:

Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small
It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself
So, from a time when you were small you were "very badly brain damaged" and took until the you late 50s to “cure” yourself.

Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand.
My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me.
So, you admitted to cheating on an IQ test but yet you are still lying that you actually have a 200 IQ. 

Stop lying.

BTW, is statistically impossible to have a 200 IQ.  If you’re going to lie you really should make it more believable. 

Mike

.. .

Quote from: Babyhighspeed on March 14, 2018, 10:40:47 PM

Shut the fuck up Heiwa....

Oh yeah, and fuck off

You sound like a badly paid, unhappy nuclear physicist or a astrophysicist. Which one are you?

My iq is the lowerest here. 85 or was it 58.

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 03:07:51 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 14, 2018, 10:34:39 PM

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. <snip>

There it is.  Yet another lie.  You stated that at the time you were badly brain damaged.  So how could you have an IQ of 200 and be "very badly brain damaged".  Let us see how you explain this in your own words.

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 04:18:18 AM

<snip> Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small - navy, sea mines, taught to kill people - but I cured myself.  http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

Quote from: MicroBeta on July 23, 2017, 05:26:54 AM

You cured yourself of brain damage?

Yes! And I explain how at http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself.

I think I am fairly well cured today. But it took a lot of time.

So, you not only claimed you were "very badly brain damaged" from when you were small but in ≈2003 you cured yourself.

Then you claimed you were tested in 1964 and had an IQ of 200.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 31, 2017, 12:55:37 AM

I remember being IQ tested 1964 for military duty! My IQ was then 200, which must have surprised the authorities. How on earth could I be so smart?  Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand. Guess how!

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2018, 05:43:55 AM

My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me. She didn't want me digging holes in the ground before becoming canon mince meat. The military authorities were impressed. I was 1/10 000 000 scoring it. Happened only once in 50 years.
 

Let’s recap your own words shall we:

Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small
It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself
So, from a time when you were small you were "very badly brain damaged" and took until the you late 50s to “cure” yourself.

Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand.
My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me.
So, you admitted to cheating on an IQ test but yet you are still lying that you actually have a 200 IQ. 

Stop lying.

BTW, is statistically impossible to have a 200 IQ.  If you’re going to lie you really should make it more believable. 

Mike

Thanks for above, mikrobrain. You are so stupid.
Yes, when I was small I was terrified all the time. Stockholm/Sweden would be vaporized by an atomic bomb dropped on me by the enemy. It is a fact. So I decided to become a warrior, to prevent it.
I had the opportunity 1964. Military service! All young men were tested. I knew exactly what type of warrior to be and ... by chance ... I met this beautiful woman four years older than me at a jazz/dance club. We really adored each other. My older brother J was chocked! How can you date such an old ... woman? She studied psychology at university and worked part time for the Swedish Armed forces to select the recruits. So a cozy night she tested my IQ using their tests. 143! Not bad.  I memorized all the errors I had done, so a couple of month later, I scored 100%. 200! Impossible? No, not when you know the answers.
After that I did a 20/20 career in the Swedish Royal Navy and then left the country for England and Japan. And there I am today. Living luxuriously in the south of France.
Today 15 March 2018 it rains and the tennis is cancelled, so I can, after a fantastic lunch, educate you with this post.

What are you going to have for lunch today?

Quote from: Heiwa on March 15, 2018, 03:53:58 AM

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 03:07:51 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 14, 2018, 10:34:39 PM

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. <snip>

There it is.  Yet another lie.  You stated that at the time you were badly brain damaged.  So how could you have an IQ of 200 and be "very badly brain damaged".  Let us see how you explain this in your own words.

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 04:18:18 AM

<snip> Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small - navy, sea mines, taught to kill people - but I cured myself.  http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

Quote from: MicroBeta on July 23, 2017, 05:26:54 AM

You cured yourself of brain damage?

Yes! And I explain how at http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself.

I think I am fairly well cured today. But it took a lot of time.

So, you not only claimed you were "very badly brain damaged" from when you were small but in ≈2003 you cured yourself.

Then you claimed you were tested in 1964 and had an IQ of 200.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 31, 2017, 12:55:37 AM

I remember being IQ tested 1964 for military duty! My IQ was then 200, which must have surprised the authorities. How on earth could I be so smart?  Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand. Guess how!

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2018, 05:43:55 AM

My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me. She didn't want me digging holes in the ground before becoming canon mince meat. The military authorities were impressed. I was 1/10 000 000 scoring it. Happened only once in 50 years.
 

Let’s recap your own words shall we:

Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small
It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself
So, from a time when you were small you were "very badly brain damaged" and took until the you late 50s to “cure” yourself.

Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand.
My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me.
So, you admitted to cheating on an IQ test but yet you are still lying that you actually have a 200 IQ. 

Stop lying.

BTW, is statistically impossible to have a 200 IQ.  If you’re going to lie you really should make it more believable. 

Mike

Thanks for above, mikrobrain. You are so stupid.
Yes, when I was small I was terrified all the time. Stockholm/Sweden would be vaporized by an atomic bomb dropped on me by the enemy. It is a fact. So I decided to become a warrior, to prevent it.
I had the opportunity 1964. Military service! All young men were tested. I knew exactly what type of warrior to be and ... by chance ... I met this beautiful woman four years older than me at a jazz/dance club. We really adored each other. My older brother J was chocked! How can you date such an old ... woman? She studied psychology at university and worked part time for the Swedish Armed forces to select the recruits. So a cozy night she tested my IQ using their tests. 143! Not bad.  I memorized all the errors I had done, so a couple of month later, I scored 100%. 200! Impossible? No, not when you know the answers.
After that I did a 20/20 career in the Swedish Royal Navy and then left the country for England and Japan. And there I am today. Living luxuriously in the south of France.
Today 15 March 2018 it rains and the tennis is cancelled, so I can, after a fantastic lunch, educate you with this post.

What are you going to have for lunch today?

Dude you educated no one.  I proved you're a liar and everyone knows it.

Question though...you said in this thread your IQ was 200 then in this post you say it's 143.  Which is the lie?

Mike

Ok. Lets continue to define: You can't direct someone who has more IQ than you. But as a man researched that matter could know this, but acting as you don't aware of this.

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 04:50:24 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 15, 2018, 03:53:58 AM

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 03:07:51 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 14, 2018, 10:34:39 PM

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. <snip>

There it is.  Yet another lie.  You stated that at the time you were badly brain damaged.  So how could you have an IQ of 200 and be "very badly brain damaged".  Let us see how you explain this in your own words.

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 04:18:18 AM

<snip> Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small - navy, sea mines, taught to kill people - but I cured myself.  http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

Quote from: MicroBeta on July 23, 2017, 05:26:54 AM

You cured yourself of brain damage?

Yes! And I explain how at http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself.

I think I am fairly well cured today. But it took a lot of time.

So, you not only claimed you were "very badly brain damaged" from when you were small but in ≈2003 you cured yourself.

Then you claimed you were tested in 1964 and had an IQ of 200.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 31, 2017, 12:55:37 AM

I remember being IQ tested 1964 for military duty! My IQ was then 200, which must have surprised the authorities. How on earth could I be so smart?  Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand. Guess how!

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2018, 05:43:55 AM

My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me. She didn't want me digging holes in the ground before becoming canon mince meat. The military authorities were impressed. I was 1/10 000 000 scoring it. Happened only once in 50 years.
 

Let’s recap your own words shall we:

Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small
It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself
So, from a time when you were small you were "very badly brain damaged" and took until the you late 50s to “cure” yourself.

Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand.
My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me.
So, you admitted to cheating on an IQ test but yet you are still lying that you actually have a 200 IQ. 

Stop lying.

BTW, is statistically impossible to have a 200 IQ.  If you’re going to lie you really should make it more believable. 

Mike

Thanks for above, mikrobrain. You are so stupid.
Yes, when I was small I was terrified all the time. Stockholm/Sweden would be vaporized by an atomic bomb dropped on me by the enemy. It is a fact. So I decided to become a warrior, to prevent it.
I had the opportunity 1964. Military service! All young men were tested. I knew exactly what type of warrior to be and ... by chance ... I met this beautiful woman four years older than me at a jazz/dance club. We really adored each other. My older brother J was chocked! How can you date such an old ... woman? She studied psychology at university and worked part time for the Swedish Armed forces to select the recruits. So a cozy night she tested my IQ using their tests. 143! Not bad.  I memorized all the errors I had done, so a couple of month later, I scored 100%. 200! Impossible? No, not when you know the answers.
After that I did a 20/20 career in the Swedish Royal Navy and then left the country for England and Japan. And there I am today. Living luxuriously in the south of France.
Today 15 March 2018 it rains and the tennis is cancelled, so I can, after a fantastic lunch, educate you with this post.

What are you going to have for lunch today?

Dude you educated no one.  I proved you're a liar and everyone knows it.

Question though...you said in this thread your IQ was 200 then in this post you say it's 143.  Which is the lie?

Mike

My IQ was 143 way back 1964 according some stupid test. I was then told the right answers of the test by a cute lady, so when I did the same test, officially, later I scored 200.
It wasn't difficult. The military anywhere isn't very bright.
You are ex USN. Didn't you notice it?

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. Physics? I asked a Nobel Prize winner physics 1923 friend, MS, about it. He didn't recommend it! Most jobs you could get as a PhD was high school physics teacher - badly paid. Research? Very little serious research done and there was severe competition. And a lot of faked-up research was available! Atomic bomb explosive fission, bla, bla, bla! http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm ! And astrophysical space trips bla, bla, bla. http://heiwaco.com/moontravel.htm ! All nonsense. You become a member of a sect where you lie under the command of some high priest.
So MS recommended me to study mechanical sciences which I did. Naval architecture, marine engineering, structural analysis, etc! Better paid and with real problems to solve.
I have of course met nuclear physicists and asked them about explosive fission and how it works. I never got a real answer. Military secrets, Russian spies, yes, so no answers.
I have also met astrophysicists and asked them how you navigate in space among the Black Holes, etc. No real answers there, too.

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 03:52:20 AM

Ok. Lets continue to define: You can't direct someone who has more IQ than you. But as a man researched that matter could know this, but acting as you don't aware of this.

It takes intelligence to recognize and admit when you are wrong,  Heiwa never admits to being wrong,  what does that tell you?

Quote from: Rayzor on March 15, 2018, 04:59:39 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 03:52:20 AM

Ok. Lets continue to define: You can't direct someone who has more IQ than you. But as a man researched that matter could know this, but acting as you don't aware of this.

It takes intelligence to recognize and admit when you are wrong,  Heiwa never admits to being wrong,  what does that tell you?

You're wrong again.  recognize and admit when you are wrong requires to be honest; not intelligence. I already agree he is a dishonest one; but a smart dishonest.

And shame on everyone else (including myself) for indulging the prick.

Quote from: Babyhighspeed on March 14, 2018, 07:44:52 PM

I always thought Heiwa was a fun goofball....thought outside the box and maybe sometimes went a little too far out. Yes, we all know he lies about who he is, money, what he has done etc etc...but I figured he was just a nice guy living in a bubble not associated with reality.

However, after this thread I have to say he is a heartless, moronic idiot. A narcissist sociopath blowhard to one of the highest degrees. Zero care for humanity, truth or anything of the sort.

In short, go away.

Yeah, sometimes I liked to stick up for him because of your above reasons, but now.... I find him utterly despicable. An awful awful human being. I'll be a bit more colourful and direct however and tell him not only to go away, but simply to fuck off. What a twerp. Just fuck off Heiwa.

Can the mods please split the off-topic character trolling to CN...

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 06:41:58 AM

Quote from: Rayzor on March 15, 2018, 04:59:39 AM

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 03:52:20 AM

Ok. Lets continue to define: You can't direct someone who has more IQ than you. But as a man researched that matter could know this, but acting as you don't aware of this.

It takes intelligence to recognize and admit when you are wrong,  Heiwa never admits to being wrong,  what does that tell you?

You're wrong again.  recognize and admit when you are wrong requires to be honest; not intelligence. I already agree he is a dishonest one; but a smart dishonest.

I disagree,  you need a certain level of intelligence to understand when you are wrong,  Dunning Kruger says it perfectly.   Stupid people aren't smart enough to know that they are stupid.

I don't assume that someone is being dishonest just because they are wrong.   Knowing you are wrong and admitting it are different things.   

If you know you are wrong and don't admit it then that's intellectual dishonesty.    I suspect Heiwa doesn't know when he's wrong.

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 04:50:24 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 15, 2018, 03:53:58 AM

Quote from: MicroBeta on March 15, 2018, 03:07:51 AM

Quote from: Heiwa on March 14, 2018, 10:34:39 PM

With my high IQ 200 I had to decide what to do 1964. <snip>

There it is.  Yet another lie.  You stated that at the time you were badly brain damaged.  So how could you have an IQ of 200 and be "very badly brain damaged".  Let us see how you explain this in your own words.

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 04:18:18 AM

<snip> Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small - navy, sea mines, taught to kill people - but I cured myself.  http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

Quote from: Heiwa on July 23, 2017, 12:26:23 PM

Quote from: MicroBeta on July 23, 2017, 05:26:54 AM

You cured yourself of brain damage?

Yes! And I explain how at http://heiwaco.com/vk12.htm .

It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself.

I think I am fairly well cured today. But it took a lot of time.

So, you not only claimed you were "very badly brain damaged" from when you were small but in ≈2003 you cured yourself.

Then you claimed you were tested in 1964 and had an IQ of 200.

Quote from: Heiwa on January 31, 2017, 12:55:37 AM

I remember being IQ tested 1964 for military duty! My IQ was then 200, which must have surprised the authorities. How on earth could I be so smart?  Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand. Guess how!

Quote from: Heiwa on January 30, 2018, 05:43:55 AM

My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me. She didn't want me digging holes in the ground before becoming canon mince meat. The military authorities were impressed. I was 1/10 000 000 scoring it. Happened only once in 50 years.
 

Let’s recap your own words shall we:

Of course I got brain damaged, when I was small
It took plenty time because I was very badly brain damaged up until, say 1988. Then it took another 15 years to heel myself
So, from a time when you were small you were "very badly brain damaged" and took until the you late 50s to “cure” yourself.

Easy, the tests were evaluated by young, female psychology students hired by the military for the job. The girls were supposed to be secret about it, but ... I got to know all the answers beforehand.
My 1964 200 IQ score was achieved by little external assistance of a cute, navy psychologist who liked me.
So, you admitted to cheating on an IQ test but yet you are still lying that you actually have a 200 IQ. 

Stop lying.

BTW, is statistically impossible to have a 200 IQ.  If you’re going to lie you really should make it more believable. 

Mike

Thanks for above, mikrobrain. You are so stupid.
Yes, when I was small I was terrified all the time. Stockholm/Sweden would be vaporized by an atomic bomb dropped on me by the enemy. It is a fact. So I decided to become a warrior, to prevent it.
I had the opportunity 1964. Military service! All young men were tested. I knew exactly what type of warrior to be and ... by chance ... I met this beautiful woman four years older than me at a jazz/dance club. We really adored each other. My older brother J was chocked! How can you date such an old ... woman? She studied psychology at university and worked part time for the Swedish Armed forces to select the recruits. So a cozy night she tested my IQ using their tests. 143! Not bad.  I memorized all the errors I had done, so a couple of month later, I scored 100%. 200! Impossible? No, not when you know the answers.
After that I did a 20/20 career in the Swedish Royal Navy and then left the country for England and Japan. And there I am today. Living luxuriously in the south of France.
Today 15 March 2018 it rains and the tennis is cancelled, so I can, after a fantastic lunch, educate you with this post.

What are you going to have for lunch today?

Dude you educated no one.  I proved you're a liar and everyone knows it.

Question though...you said in this thread your IQ was 200 then in this post you say it's 143.  Which is the lie?

Mike

My IQ was 143 way back 1964 according some stupid test. I was then told the right answers of the test by a cute lady, so when I did the same test, officially, later I scored 200.
It wasn't difficult. The military anywhere isn't very bright.
You are ex USN. Didn't you notice it?

Quote from: Rayzor on March 15, 2018, 07:01:42 AM

Dunning Kruger says it perfectly.   Stupid people aren't smart enough to know that they are stupid.

I only agree with this one that I marked. So, how can you be sure to you on which side, I mean, the true side?

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to recognize their mistakes. The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their own abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority.

Those who genuinely know their stuff are considerably modest, when compared to those who have a fraction of their experience and knowledge

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 15, 2018, 03:46:25 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on March 15, 2018, 07:01:42 AM

Dunning Kruger says it perfectly.   Stupid people aren't smart enough to know that they are stupid.

I only agree with this one that I marked. So, how can you be sure to you on which side, I mean, the true side?

People who don't have the metacognitive ability to recognize when they might be wrong.   People like Heiwa who claim an IQ of 200, and have over inflated views of their own abilities and understanding, are almost textbook examples of this syndrome.

Quote

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled people make poor decisions and reach erroneous conclusions, but their incompetence denies them the metacognitive ability to recognize their mistakes. The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their ability as above average, much higher than it actually is, while the highly skilled underrate their own abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority.

Those who genuinely know their stuff are considerably modest, when compared to those who have a fraction of their experience and knowledge

Basically people who brag about how smart they are,  are likely to be suffering from the syndrome.

I think we should return to issue. Otherwise, your low IQ globist partners are blaming us to dispense the issue.

Heiwa and Intikam, fuck you both. Stephen Hawking is one of my idols and his loss saddens me deeply. He has more intelligence in his pinky finger than you both have in your entire pea-sized brains. Hawking is more of a man than you two will ever be, motherfuckers.

Quote from: Albert Wesker on March 14, 2018, 07:15:28 AM

Heiwa and Intikam, fuck you both. Stephen Hawking is one of my idols and his loss saddens me deeply. He has more intelligence in his pinky finger than you both have in your entire pea-sized brains. Hawking is more of a man than you two will ever be, motherfuckers.

Yep. He was extremely inspirational. It feels weird to hear about him dying, I always felt as though he was immortal or something.

All you have to do is google ALS and you know you are wrong. Many people with ALS survived a long time like Hawking. That's just a fact.

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on March 16, 2018, 04:40:11 AM

Quote from: Albert Wesker on March 14, 2018, 07:15:28 AM

Heiwa and Intikam, fuck you both. Stephen Hawking is one of my idols and his loss saddens me deeply. He has more intelligence in his pinky finger than you both have in your entire pea-sized brains. Hawking is more of a man than you two will ever be, motherfuckers.

Yep. He was extremely inspirational. It feels weird to hear about him dying, I always felt as though he was immortal or something.

You pointed extremely an important point. If he was fking smarter than me, why could not him discovered the immortality? That only took my a few days; but his completely a life; and he could not succeed to discover it. As an evidence, We understand it by his dying. 

Quote from: brotherhood of the dome on March 16, 2018, 05:38:50 AM

Quote from: Definitely Not Official on March 16, 2018, 04:40:11 AM

Quote from: Albert Wesker on March 14, 2018, 07:15:28 AM

Heiwa and Intikam, fuck you both. Stephen Hawking is one of my idols and his loss saddens me deeply. He has more intelligence in his pinky finger than you both have in your entire pea-sized brains. Hawking is more of a man than you two will ever be, motherfuckers.

Yep. He was extremely inspirational. It feels weird to hear about him dying, I always felt as though he was immortal or something.

You pointed extremely an important point. If he was fking smarter than me, why could not him discovered the immortality? That only took my a few days; but his completely a life; and he could not succeed to discover it. As an evidence, We understand it by his dying. 

But you have not proven you have discovered it, you have only claimed it.  Then asked for tens of millions of dollars so you can research it.

Quote from: FalseProphet on March 14, 2018, 11:04:51 AM

All you have to do is google ALS and you know you are wrong. Many people with ALS survived a long time like Hawking. That's just a fact.

Yeah, Google states you are wrong.