You wont accept IQ scores or SAT results. I am wondering what measurement of intelligence you would find acceptable?
Unless you want to claim that intelligence isn't measurable. You would actually be able to keep your position without debating any facts that way.
I don't know. You are the one claiming to have "just facts". The onus is on you. If the facts really aren't that simple, that is your problem.
I am not ideologically opposed to differences in intelligence by race due to genetics. I have just never seen a convincing argument for it. I
am opposed to using differences in intelligence by race to justify bigotry. And in my experience, both personal and historical, people that push oversimplified conclusions of racial supremacy/inferiority are generally only trying to justify bigotry.
So AGAIN I ask, what is your goal here?