another red herring

The conspiracy lists the FE community run now needs to include fishing fleets.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43169824

What would be the purpose of such a fishy deception?

"By area, fishing's footprint is now over four times that of agriculture.

That's an astonishing observation given that fisheries provide only 1.2% of global caloric production for human food consumption."

Oh wow. Had no idea the number was that low.

Note to self: eat more fish.

What deception? It asserts satellites picked up the data, stratellites did it instead. Amazingly most data isn't picked up by people physically climbing to some satellite or stratellite, they just receive it.

Far more interesting is that the site recommends me this feature:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43137005
Now that's hard to explain.

The conspiracy lists the FE community run now needs to include fishing fleets.

That ship sailed long ago.

What deception? It asserts satellites picked up the data, stratellites did it instead. Amazingly most data isn't picked up by people physically climbing to some satellite or stratellite, they just receive it.

Far more interesting is that the site recommends me this feature:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43137005
Now that's hard to explain.

Presumably because you have a search history that includes china, funerals or strippers.....

What deception? It asserts satellites picked up the data, stratellites did it instead. Amazingly most data isn't picked up by people physically climbing to some satellite or stratellite, they just receive it.

Far more interesting is that the site recommends me this feature:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43137005
Now that's hard to explain.

Wrong, the data is picked up by satellites.  Unless you have details of an alternative.

"By area, fishing's footprint is now over four times that of agriculture.

That's an astonishing observation given that fisheries provide only 1.2% of global caloric production for human food consumption."

Oh wow. Had no idea the number was that low.

Note to self: eat more fish.

I hope you won't be restricting yourself to just flatfish!   ;-)

What deception? It asserts satellites picked up the data, stratellites did it instead. Amazingly most data isn't picked up by people physically climbing to some satellite or stratellite, they just receive it.

Far more interesting is that the site recommends me this feature:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43137005
Now that's hard to explain.

Proof of your stratalites please, you could also include where they are designed and manufactured and who by and who launches them..... and links to the companies involved.

I can provide you with detailed information on who designs satellites, and where they are launched as well as their current orbits. What information can you provide as evidence of your bizarre claim?

The conspiracy lists the FE community run now needs to include fishing fleets.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43169824

What would be the purpose of such a fishy deception?

I wonder if any of those fisherman reported al the extra water in the Southern Hemisphere?

Quote from: Lonegranger on February 24, 2018, 07:23:02 AM

The conspiracy lists the FE community run now needs to include fishing fleets.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-43169824

What would be the purpose of such a fishy deception?

I wonder if any of those fisherman reported al the extra water in the Southern Hemisphere?

I take it you are referring to raised sea levels.
https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2005/jul/HQ_05175_sea_level_monitored.html

No. I meant if the earth is flat the Southern Hemisphere is bigger than the northern.

What deception? It asserts satellites picked up the data, stratellites did it instead. Amazingly most data isn't picked up by people physically climbing to some satellite or stratellite, they just receive it.

Far more interesting is that the site recommends me this feature:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-43137005
Now that's hard to explain.

Im sure you are more interested in strippers, but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?Detailed  information on this would be grand.

No. I meant if the earth is flat the Southern Hemisphere is bigger than the northern.

Ah!

but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?

They are tethered to large docile fish.

Quote from: Lonegranger on February 25, 2018, 08:54:31 AM

but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?

They are tethered to large docile fish.

Must be true as you present no evidence....so  I believe it.

Quote from: Lonegranger on February 25, 2018, 08:54:31 AM

but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?

They are tethered to large docile fish.

I had heard they were tethered to buoys which where anchored by anchor chains to the bottom of the ocean to the anchors.
A chain about 2 1/2 miles long in the vicinity of the Titanic wreck.

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on February 25, 2018, 11:02:37 AM

Quote from: Lonegranger on February 25, 2018, 08:54:31 AM

but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?

They are tethered to large docile fish.

I had heard they were tethered to buoys which where anchored by anchor chains to the bottom of the ocean to the anchors.
A chain about 2 1/2 miles long in the vicinity of the Titanic wreck.

Those chains would get a bit long for those stratolites over the Marianas Trench - 10,994 m, whatever that in archaic units.
But what I find very odd is that there were satellites around earth from the late 1950s and even around the moon from the mid 1960s, yet stratolites don't seem to be in wide use even now!

Quote from: Googleotomy on February 25, 2018, 03:20:12 PM

Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on February 25, 2018, 11:02:37 AM

Quote from: Lonegranger on February 25, 2018, 08:54:31 AM

but how do your stratalites maintain their positions over open ocean?

They are tethered to large docile fish.

I had heard they were tethered to buoys which where anchored by anchor chains to the bottom of the ocean to the anchors.
A chain about 2 1/2 miles long in the vicinity of the Titanic wreck.

Those chains would get a bit long for those stratolites over the Marianas Trench - 10,994 m, whatever that in archaic units.

6012 fathoms.
 

1.75 leagues.